<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
>

<channel>
	<title>Streetsblog New York City &#187; Recycling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/category/issues-campaigns/recycling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Albany Gives the Go-Ahead to Gansevoort Waste Transfer Station</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/25/albany-gives-the-go-ahead-to-gansevoort-waste-transfer-station/</link>
		<comments>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/25/albany-gives-the-go-ahead-to-gansevoort-waste-transfer-station/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chelsea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/25/albany-gives-the-go-ahead-to-gansevoort-waste-transfer-station/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
  State lawmakers reached an agreement yesterday allowing the city to move forward with plans for a recycling transfer station on Manhattan's Gansevoort peninsula near 14th Street. The step may do more to reduce traffic than any other measure passed during the latest legislative session, which wrapped up this morning. 
  The <a href=http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/25/albany-gives-the-go-ahead-to-gansevoort-waste-transfer-station/>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="225" align="right" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 8px; padding: 0px;" alt="garbage-trucks_2.jpg" src="http://www.streetsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06_23/garbage-trucks_2.jpg" /></p> 
  <p>State lawmakers <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/nyregion/25transfer.html?ref=nyregion">reached an agreement yesterday</a> allowing the city to move forward with plans for a <a href="http://www.plannyc.org/project-137-Gansevoort-Marine-Transfer-Station">recycling transfer station</a> on Manhattan's Gansevoort peninsula near 14th Street. The step may do more to reduce traffic than any other measure passed during the latest legislative session, which wrapped up this morning.<br /></p> 
  <p>The Gansevoort station is part of the city's <a href="http://www.plannyc.org/project-112-Solid-Waste-Management-Plan">Solid Waste Management Plan</a>. By requiring each borough to handle its own trash, the plan is projected to reduce truck traffic within the city by about 3.5 million miles per year, in total. Areas that handle a disproportionate amount of the city's waste and the attendant truck traffic -- and suffer higher asthma rates as a result -- stand to see the greatest relief. As <a href="http://blog.tstc.org/2008/05/27/nyc-solid-waste-plan-again-in-assemblys-hands/">Mobilizing the Region</a> noted last month, the opening of a Manhattan recycling station will mean fewer trucks fanning out to the Bronx, Brooklyn, and New Jersey. </p> 
  <p>Because the Gansevoort station is slated for a site on the Hudson River Park, state approval was required. Speaker Sheldon Silver had <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/10/22/silver-holds-up-plan-to-reduce-garbage-truck-traffic/">blocked the station</a> last October at the behest of three Manhattan Assembly members. This time around, provisions were included to set aside future park funding and assure public access to the Hudson River Greenway during construction.</p> 
  <p><em>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/71651612@N00/184040750/">anazzarophotography/Flickr</a></em><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/25/albany-gives-the-go-ahead-to-gansevoort-waste-transfer-station/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<georss:point featurename="14th St and 11th Ave, Chelsea">40.742371 -74.008699</georss:point>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell Supports PlaNYC, but Congestion Pricing?</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/29/odonnell-supports-planyc-but-congestion-pricing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/29/odonnell-supports-planyc-but-congestion-pricing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Varone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congestion Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn McAnanama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhattan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhattan Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morningside Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlaNYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper West Side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/29/odonnell-supports-planyc-but-congestion-pricing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
    Below is State Assembly Member Daniel O'Donnell's response to a letter from Streetsblog contributor Glenn McAnanama urging O'Donnell to support congestion pricing. O'Donnell claims that no specific legislation has been introduced regarding PlaNYC so he cannot take a position. 

    O'Donnell represents the 69th Assembly District which includes <a href=http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/29/odonnell-supports-planyc-but-congestion-pricing/>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <p>Below is State Assembly Member Daniel O'Donnell's response to a letter from Streetsblog contributor Glenn McAnanama urging O'Donnell to support congestion pricing. O'Donnell claims that no specific legislation has been introduced regarding PlaNYC so he cannot take a position. <br /></p>

    <p>O'Donnell represents the 69th Assembly District which includes Manhattan Valley, Morningside Heights, and the Upper West Side of Manhattan.</p>

    <blockquote>
      <p>Thank you for reaching out to my office. I find it valuable to gain awareness of the legislative issues my constituents are concerned with. I genuinely appreciate the effort you took to address your views on PlaNYC 2030.</p>

      <p>I commend Mayor Michael Bloomberg's comprehensive approach to making New York City more environmentally sustainable. New York City has always been a leader in sustainable urban policy for the rest of the world's great cities and the proposed PlaNYC 2030 is a major example of that leadership. <strong>As of the moment, no detailed legislation has been presented to members of the New York State Legislature regarding the many programs under PlaNYC 2030. Until I can consider every detail of any proposed legislation and how it would affect the lives and families of my constituents, I cannot take a definite position.</strong></p>

      <p>Be assured of my commitment and longstanding support to improve environmental sustainability and public transportation in New York City. I am currently a sponsor of the <a href="http://www.nypirg.org/enviro/bottlebill/">&quot;Bigger Better Bottle Bill&quot;</a>, which expands the Returnable Container Act to non-carbonated beverages. I am also an advocate for developing a freight rail-tunnel in our city, which would go a long way in alleviating the traffic congestion that negatively affects our quality of life.</p>

      <p>As the status of PlaNYC 2030 evolves in the State Assembly, please continue to contact my office with your concerns. I fully welcome any further comments you may have.</p>

      <p>Very truly yours,
      <br />
       Daniel O'Donnell
      <br />
       Assembly Member</p>
    </blockquote>
  ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/29/odonnell-supports-planyc-but-congestion-pricing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<georss:point featurename="104th and Broadway Manhattan, NY">40.79974 -73.968095</georss:point>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
