- Streetsblog New York City - http://www.streetsblog.org -

The Move NY Fair Tolling Plan Is Polling Better Than Congestion Pricing

Posted By Brad Aaron On June 16, 2014 @ 12:44 pm In "Gridlock" Sam Schwartz,Bridge Tolls,Congestion Pricing,Streetsblog | 28 Comments

Toll reform is polling better [1] in New York City than congestion pricing did, even when pollsters don’t mention that the Move NY plan [2] would mean billions in transit revenue.

Capital New York’s Dana Rubinstein reports [3]

“Would you support or oppose a plan to charge tolls on the East River bridges, which go into Manhattan, and at the same time reduce tolls on the bridges between the Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, and Staten Island?” a Quinnipiac University pollster asked New York City voters earlier this month.

The voters were divided, 49 percent against, 41 percent in favor.

Support fluctuated by borough — it was strongest in Staten Island and the Bronx — and was about the same among voters who drive to work (51-43 percent opposed) and those who take transit (49-42 percent opposed).

These are stronger numbers than congestion pricing got in 2007 and 2008. The proposal for a road charge below 60th Street in Manhattan during rush hours polled in the 30s [4], generally, when transit revenue was not mentioned. Pricing polled in the high 50s and low 60s when it was framed as a way to keep fares low.

The Move NY plan, developed by transportation consultant “Gridlock” Sam Schwartz, would establish a Central Business District cordon at 60th Street and add tolls to East River bridges, while tolls on outer-borough crossings would be reduced. The plan calls for removing the Manhattan parking tax rebate and adding a taxi trip surcharge. It would raise nearly $1.5 billion a year, with a quarter of revenue dedicated to road and bridge maintenance and the remainder to transit capital and operating funds.

Congestion pricing has risen in popularity in cities that have implemented it. Despite intense opposition beforehand, after three years 70 percent of Londoners [5] said that city’s road pricing program was effective, and twice as many supported the charge as opposed it. Though it doesn’t yet have a champion in Albany, a coalition of interests [6], from the Straphangers Campaign to AAA New York, has coalesced behind the Move NY toll reform proposal. There’s room for its poll numbers to climb, if the upside for transit is part of the framing.

Here’s another figure for state lawmakers to consider: In 2007 [7], 87 percent of voters said traffic congestion was a “very serious” or “somewhat serious” problem. This month it was essentially unchanged at 86 percent.


Article printed from Streetsblog New York City: http://www.streetsblog.org

URL to article: http://www.streetsblog.org/2014/06/16/the-move-ny-fair-tolling-plan-is-polling-better-than-congestion-pricing/

URLs in this post:

[1] polling better: http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/new-york-city/release-detail?ReleaseID=2052

[2] Move NY plan: http://www.streetsblog.org/2012/10/15/instead-of-more-fare-hikes-how-about-bridge-tolls-that-make-sense/

[3] reports: http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/city-hall/2014/06/8547225/poll-results-mixed-reorganized-bridge-toll-plan

[4] polled in the 30s: http://www.streetsblog.org/2013/02/20/graphed-support-for-congestion-pricing-depends-on-how-you-frame-it/

[5] 70 percent of Londoners: http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/01/18/new-congestion-charging-survey-in-line-with-london-stockholm/

[6] a coalition of interests: http://www.streetsblog.org/2014/03/21/like-getting-nixon-to-china-say-unlikely-allies-at-toll-reform-kickoff/

[7] 2007: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/is-manhattan-turning-against-congestion-pricing/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0#comment-96137

Copyright © 2008 Streetsblog. All rights reserved.