<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JSK&#8217;s &#8220;98 Percent&#8221; Car-Free Central Park Claim Is 100 Percent Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-216481</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-216481</guid>
		<description>I take it that using the at-grade streets on Central Park for bus service isn&#039;t an option.

By the way: I&#039;ve crossed Central Park at 3 a.m. a few times and never been ejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it that using the at-grade streets on Central Park for bus service isn&#8217;t an option.</p>
<p>By the way: I&#8217;ve crossed Central Park at 3 a.m. a few times and never been ejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-216061</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-216061</guid>
		<description>Bidirectional is a great idea for both CP and PP.  

Requires car-free parks though!  Give us both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bidirectional is a great idea for both CP and PP.  </p>
<p>Requires car-free parks though!  Give us both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Edelman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-216011</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Edelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-216011</guid>
		<description>sorry: &quot;more or less not a fib&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry: &#8220;more or less not a fib&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Edelman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-216001</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Edelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-216001</guid>
		<description>This is getting sort of silly. JSK was just using an expression to indicate it was mostly closed. Given all the curfew and weekends plus weekday limits, it is more or not a fib.

BUT as several folks have mentioned, it is the commuter times which are the main issues. So I humbly suggest we re-frame this as something like &quot;Carfree Central Park Rush Hour&quot; or &quot;Central Park Carfree Rush Hour&quot; etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is getting sort of silly. JSK was just using an expression to indicate it was mostly closed. Given all the curfew and weekends plus weekday limits, it is more or not a fib.</p>
<p>BUT as several folks have mentioned, it is the commuter times which are the main issues. So I humbly suggest we re-frame this as something like &#8220;Carfree Central Park Rush Hour&#8221; or &#8220;Central Park Carfree Rush Hour&#8221; etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tubulus</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215991</link>
		<dc:creator>Tubulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215991</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s probably using some sort of total time-miles to calculate the 98%. For example, if the park was car-free or 75% of the day, and half was open to cars the rest of the day, she would say it&#039;s closed to cars 75% + 25%*50% = 87.5% of the time. Haven&#039;t worked out the actual numbers here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s probably using some sort of total time-miles to calculate the 98%. For example, if the park was car-free or 75% of the day, and half was open to cars the rest of the day, she would say it&#8217;s closed to cars 75% + 25%*50% = 87.5% of the time. Haven&#8217;t worked out the actual numbers here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter from Stuy Town</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215661</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter from Stuy Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215661</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this, Ken. Nice work.

About a year ago I was stopped riding through Central Park on my bike at 1:30am. My pretty wife&#039;s demeanor probably helped us to be let go with a warning, but the cops were pretty grumpy about us not knowing the curfew is still in effect.

Oh, and Kaja -- you say harassment and it probably was, but I&#039;m willing to bet the cops thought they were doing you a solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this, Ken. Nice work.</p>
<p>About a year ago I was stopped riding through Central Park on my bike at 1:30am. My pretty wife&#8217;s demeanor probably helped us to be let go with a warning, but the cops were pretty grumpy about us not knowing the curfew is still in effect.</p>
<p>Oh, and Kaja &#8212; you say harassment and it probably was, but I&#8217;m willing to bet the cops thought they were doing you a solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LN</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215641</link>
		<dc:creator>LN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215641</guid>
		<description>Re: Parks closing at 1am. These were put into place by the Central Park and Prospect Park Conservancies. This ticketing is bogus, since the park drives are DOT roads. 

Some worked on this a while back... to no avail. It sucks that when the park is quiet ---except for boat house drivers &#039;picking up and dropping off&#039; between 72nd and 96th-- and bikers are ticketed. 

At least one person who complained at the central park precinct community meeting about this was told by a CP Conservancy rep that the reason for closing the park was &#039;so the animals could sleep&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Parks closing at 1am. These were put into place by the Central Park and Prospect Park Conservancies. This ticketing is bogus, since the park drives are DOT roads. </p>
<p>Some worked on this a while back&#8230; to no avail. It sucks that when the park is quiet &#8212;except for boat house drivers &#8216;picking up and dropping off&#8217; between 72nd and 96th&#8211; and bikers are ticketed. </p>
<p>At least one person who complained at the central park precinct community meeting about this was told by a CP Conservancy rep that the reason for closing the park was &#8216;so the animals could sleep&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaja</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215581</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215581</guid>
		<description>(Meant to quote Mark Epstein there; the comment engine ate my tag.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Meant to quote Mark Epstein there; the comment engine ate my tag.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaja</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215571</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215571</guid>
		<description> I&#039;ve done it in Prospect Park, in full view of the cops, who didn&#039;t give me a ticket.

This is how I found out that parks in NYC close at 1am: Using Prospect Park northbound as a cut-through a bit after one, cops flagged me down and explained the situation. I said I&#039;d book it to Grand Army, and then began climbing the great hill...

with the police SUV directly behind me, as in tailgating, with the brights on. So that I couldn&#039;t slow down, and requiring every ounce of control to avoid tripping my fight-or-flight response. Outright harassment. Following me up the hill.

Lessons come in many forms!

Close the park to auto traffic both ways, and put a double yellow stripe down the center of it. I&#039;d use the loop way more, on my bike, were it bidirectional; as it is I avoid it since it&#039;s mostly going the wrong way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done it in Prospect Park, in full view of the cops, who didn&#8217;t give me a ticket.</p>
<p>This is how I found out that parks in NYC close at 1am: Using Prospect Park northbound as a cut-through a bit after one, cops flagged me down and explained the situation. I said I&#8217;d book it to Grand Army, and then began climbing the great hill&#8230;</p>
<p>with the police SUV directly behind me, as in tailgating, with the brights on. So that I couldn&#8217;t slow down, and requiring every ounce of control to avoid tripping my fight-or-flight response. Outright harassment. Following me up the hill.</p>
<p>Lessons come in many forms!</p>
<p>Close the park to auto traffic both ways, and put a double yellow stripe down the center of it. I&#8217;d use the loop way more, on my bike, were it bidirectional; as it is I avoid it since it&#8217;s mostly going the wrong way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Boy Grunt</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215521</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Boy Grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215521</guid>
		<description>Woody makes some good arguments for interim closings, but I have to say it really irritates me when people make statements like &quot;that strip from 6th Ave to 72nd isn&#039;t going car-free in our lifetimes.&quot;  I always wonder why such far-seeing individuals aren&#039;t making millions down on Wall Street.  My response to them is: &quot;I&#039;m sorry to hear you&#039;ve given up.&quot;  The most accurate thing that can be said about that section of the drive is that without Woody&#039;s help, it may be a little less likely to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody makes some good arguments for interim closings, but I have to say it really irritates me when people make statements like &#8220;that strip from 6th Ave to 72nd isn&#8217;t going car-free in our lifetimes.&#8221;  I always wonder why such far-seeing individuals aren&#8217;t making millions down on Wall Street.  My response to them is: &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry to hear you&#8217;ve given up.&#8221;  The most accurate thing that can be said about that section of the drive is that without Woody&#8217;s help, it may be a little less likely to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215511</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215511</guid>
		<description>How about the fancy new park signs on many of the barricades? They proclaim that the drive is closed except to official vehicles. Never mind that the drive is wide open to bikes, runners, skaters, skiers, walkers, bird-watchers, and anyone else not in a *motor* vehicle. The sentiment of &quot;closed&quot; kinda misses the whole point of the park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the fancy new park signs on many of the barricades? They proclaim that the drive is closed except to official vehicles. Never mind that the drive is wide open to bikes, runners, skaters, skiers, walkers, bird-watchers, and anyone else not in a *motor* vehicle. The sentiment of &#8220;closed&#8221; kinda misses the whole point of the park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215461</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215461</guid>
		<description>We made nice progress earlier in the Bloomie Administration in getting the traffic hours whittled back, and secondary entrances to the Park shut. But for whatever reason, this Mayor and this Commish seem to feel that a total closure would be too controversial, if only perhaps among the Upper East Side set that goes out to dine.

Focus on getting a few more slices off the salami. 

Make the evening Rush Hour only two hours long. The stock exchange is open until 4 p.m., how the heck does &quot;Rush Hour&quot; begin at 3 p.m.? Aim for a Rush Hour of 4:30 to 6:30 p.m., but live with 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. This really should be an easy win.

Close the East Side Drive at 90th St. The fine citizens who dine with Bloomie and those who vote for him leave the Park at 72nd or 90th St already. Very few drivers exiting at 110th St are going to Harlem -- they&#039;re headed to Westchester and Connecticut.

Get Summer Hours that close the drives from Memorial Day Weekend through Labor Day. After all, that&#039;s when the Park is full of kids from child care and summer camp programs anyway. Call the Summer Hours a &quot;trial period.&quot; We&#039;ll never see traffic in Central Park during the heat of summer again.

Finally, that strip from 6th Ave to 72nd isn&#039;t going car-free in our lifetimes. So toll it. More than half those vehicles are taxis and town cars anyway, and they all carry E-Z-Pass. Send the proceeds to the Parks Department for use in the parks outside Manhattan.

Every time the salami gets sliced, we get fewer drivers using the Park and less opposition to closing it to cars altogether. Let&#039;s keep whittling our way to victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We made nice progress earlier in the Bloomie Administration in getting the traffic hours whittled back, and secondary entrances to the Park shut. But for whatever reason, this Mayor and this Commish seem to feel that a total closure would be too controversial, if only perhaps among the Upper East Side set that goes out to dine.</p>
<p>Focus on getting a few more slices off the salami. </p>
<p>Make the evening Rush Hour only two hours long. The stock exchange is open until 4 p.m., how the heck does &#8220;Rush Hour&#8221; begin at 3 p.m.? Aim for a Rush Hour of 4:30 to 6:30 p.m., but live with 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. This really should be an easy win.</p>
<p>Close the East Side Drive at 90th St. The fine citizens who dine with Bloomie and those who vote for him leave the Park at 72nd or 90th St already. Very few drivers exiting at 110th St are going to Harlem &#8212; they&#8217;re headed to Westchester and Connecticut.</p>
<p>Get Summer Hours that close the drives from Memorial Day Weekend through Labor Day. After all, that&#8217;s when the Park is full of kids from child care and summer camp programs anyway. Call the Summer Hours a &#8220;trial period.&#8221; We&#8217;ll never see traffic in Central Park during the heat of summer again.</p>
<p>Finally, that strip from 6th Ave to 72nd isn&#8217;t going car-free in our lifetimes. So toll it. More than half those vehicles are taxis and town cars anyway, and they all carry E-Z-Pass. Send the proceeds to the Parks Department for use in the parks outside Manhattan.</p>
<p>Every time the salami gets sliced, we get fewer drivers using the Park and less opposition to closing it to cars altogether. Let&#8217;s keep whittling our way to victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Coughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215441</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Coughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215441</guid>
		<description>To answer Jonathan about counts during the Marathon closing, for years TA had tried to get the previous DOT administration to take that opportunity to measure traffic impacts, to no avail.  Our campaign did a few counts on CPW and Columbus Ave. both during and after the Marathon closing in &#039;02 and &#039;03 and found a very small (5-10 percent) uptick in traffic during the closing but also no unusual traffic tie-ups.  It&#039;s not a fair measure anyway because the short duration of the Marathon closing doesn&#039;t give drivers adequate time to adjust habits or switch to other modes.  The Regional Plan Association estimates that traffic &quot;shrinkage&quot; would be between 20 and 60 percent. 

The DOT has done three major, detailed studies of the traffic impact of various closings -- two studies in 2005 (one on the impact of The Gates) and one in 2007.  There is nothing in any of these studies that justifies hesitating on a three-month trial closing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer Jonathan about counts during the Marathon closing, for years TA had tried to get the previous DOT administration to take that opportunity to measure traffic impacts, to no avail.  Our campaign did a few counts on CPW and Columbus Ave. both during and after the Marathon closing in &#8217;02 and &#8217;03 and found a very small (5-10 percent) uptick in traffic during the closing but also no unusual traffic tie-ups.  It&#8217;s not a fair measure anyway because the short duration of the Marathon closing doesn&#8217;t give drivers adequate time to adjust habits or switch to other modes.  The Regional Plan Association estimates that traffic &#8220;shrinkage&#8221; would be between 20 and 60 percent. </p>
<p>The DOT has done three major, detailed studies of the traffic impact of various closings &#8212; two studies in 2005 (one on the impact of The Gates) and one in 2007.  There is nothing in any of these studies that justifies hesitating on a three-month trial closing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215431</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215431</guid>
		<description>My hunch is that she just said &quot;98% of the time&quot; as a proxy for &quot;most of the time&quot;.  I agree with all the above comments that it&#039;d be better off if there were no cars on it ever, but let&#039;s not jump on JSK (one of the strongest voices for making city space available to people rather than just to cars, after all) for what might just be a poorly turned phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My hunch is that she just said &#8220;98% of the time&#8221; as a proxy for &#8220;most of the time&#8221;.  I agree with all the above comments that it&#8217;d be better off if there were no cars on it ever, but let&#8217;s not jump on JSK (one of the strongest voices for making city space available to people rather than just to cars, after all) for what might just be a poorly turned phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aliostuni</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215421</link>
		<dc:creator>aliostuni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215421</guid>
		<description>Were the park car-free, the space on the loop could be distributed much more sensibly: both by mode and direction.  The need for counterflow traffic is evident by the bike riders (generally tourists, delivery people, and the occasional commuter) who already go against the flow.  It&#039;s dangerous right now, but it doesn&#039;t need to be: and a safe route both uptown and downtown could be provided so easily simply by eliminating the unnecessary motorized vehicle traffic that eats so much space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were the park car-free, the space on the loop could be distributed much more sensibly: both by mode and direction.  The need for counterflow traffic is evident by the bike riders (generally tourists, delivery people, and the occasional commuter) who already go against the flow.  It&#8217;s dangerous right now, but it doesn&#8217;t need to be: and a safe route both uptown and downtown could be provided so easily simply by eliminating the unnecessary motorized vehicle traffic that eats so much space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215381</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215381</guid>
		<description>It sounded wrong when she said it!

I second BicyclesOnly, it&#039;s not really sensible to include the night hours when the park is CLOSED.  If one excludes those hours (one should) in calculating the percentage of time the park is car free, then it&#039;s way less than 98%.

As far as the curfew, as I understand it, no one--bikes, cars, peds--is allowed in the park after 1:00am.  Those who have gotten off without a ticket (not for being on a bike, but for being in the park) have just been lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounded wrong when she said it!</p>
<p>I second BicyclesOnly, it&#8217;s not really sensible to include the night hours when the park is CLOSED.  If one excludes those hours (one should) in calculating the percentage of time the park is car free, then it&#8217;s way less than 98%.</p>
<p>As far as the curfew, as I understand it, no one&#8211;bikes, cars, peds&#8211;is allowed in the park after 1:00am.  Those who have gotten off without a ticket (not for being on a bike, but for being in the park) have just been lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BicyclesOnly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215371</link>
		<dc:creator>BicyclesOnly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215371</guid>
		<description>The curfew reflects the park&#039;s history of violent and other crime at night, and probably also the desire to save costs by limiting the number of NYPD needed to monitor the park.  However, things have changed quite a bit, certainly enough for the city to re-evaluate the curfew.  Extending the park hours to 3 a.m. or later on Friday and Saturday nights during the warmer six months would certainly be reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curfew reflects the park&#8217;s history of violent and other crime at night, and probably also the desire to save costs by limiting the number of NYPD needed to monitor the park.  However, things have changed quite a bit, certainly enough for the city to re-evaluate the curfew.  Extending the park hours to 3 a.m. or later on Friday and Saturday nights during the warmer six months would certainly be reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vnm</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215351</link>
		<dc:creator>vnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215351</guid>
		<description>I use the West Drive almost exclusively between 8 and 9 a.m., to bike to work. From my perspective, it is open to cars 98% of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the West Drive almost exclusively between 8 and 9 a.m., to bike to work. From my perspective, it is open to cars 98% of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Edelman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215331</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Edelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215331</guid>
		<description>Good job, Ken!

Now, why is there a curfew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job, Ken!</p>
<p>Now, why is there a curfew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BicyclesOnly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/03/09/jsks-98-percent-car-free-central-park-claim-is-100-percent-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-215301</link>
		<dc:creator>BicyclesOnly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=164431#comment-215301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been ejected by NYPD from Central Park as early as 1:05 a.m., and I know cyclists who have been ticketed for violation the curfew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been ejected by NYPD from Central Park as early as 1:05 a.m., and I know cyclists who have been ticketed for violation the curfew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

