<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill to Protect Pedestrians and Cyclists Will Resurface in Albany</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David_K</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/comment-page-1/#comment-185891</link>
		<dc:creator>David_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=127241#comment-185891</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, thanks for reminding me of the Maureen McCormick interview:  sounds like she is in favor of scrapping the whole rule of two thing.  Unfortch, other DA offices probably don&#039;t share her priorities.

Ian, it is a ruse, and a dumb one.  As McCormick points out, someone going 20 mph over the speed limit probably wouldn&#039;t see the stopsign anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, thanks for reminding me of the Maureen McCormick interview:  sounds like she is in favor of scrapping the whole rule of two thing.  Unfortch, other DA offices probably don&#8217;t share her priorities.</p>
<p>Ian, it is a ruse, and a dumb one.  As McCormick points out, someone going 20 mph over the speed limit probably wouldn&#8217;t see the stopsign anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/comment-page-1/#comment-185651</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=127241#comment-185651</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dynamic&lt;/strong&gt;, there is no reason to take away the freedom of the DA to allocate resources where they are properly needed. Handcuffing the DA&#039;s office in this way will only result in more excuses, delays, and denials. Better to keep the DA&#039;s feet to the fire at the polls.

&lt;strong&gt;David&lt;/strong&gt;, I&#039;m convinced that the &quot;rule of two&quot; is just a ruse. In 2009 there were lots of examples where two or more violations were committed concurrently, which met with the same apathy as any other case of automotive violence.

Cheers,

--Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dynamic</strong>, there is no reason to take away the freedom of the DA to allocate resources where they are properly needed. Handcuffing the DA&#8217;s office in this way will only result in more excuses, delays, and denials. Better to keep the DA&#8217;s feet to the fire at the polls.</p>
<p><strong>David</strong>, I&#8217;m convinced that the &#8220;rule of two&#8221; is just a ruse. In 2009 there were lots of examples where two or more violations were committed concurrently, which met with the same apathy as any other case of automotive violence.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>&#8211;Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/comment-page-1/#comment-185621</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=127241#comment-185621</guid>
		<description>Mumeschantz, so every automobile crime trial should be decided by a jury? No guarantee of avoiding the windshield perspective there. 

David, did you read the interview with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/31/maureen-mccormick-on-the-cutting-edge-of-traffic-justice/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Maureen McCormick&lt;/a&gt;? She explains everything about the so-called rule of two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mumeschantz, so every automobile crime trial should be decided by a jury? No guarantee of avoiding the windshield perspective there. </p>
<p>David, did you read the interview with <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/31/maureen-mccormick-on-the-cutting-edge-of-traffic-justice/" rel="nofollow">Maureen McCormick</a>? She explains everything about the so-called rule of two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David_K</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/comment-page-1/#comment-185601</link>
		<dc:creator>David_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=127241#comment-185601</guid>
		<description>Would this bill do anything to change the &quot;Rule of Two&quot; (the rather silly precedent that drivers don&#039;t get charged for violating a law; rather they have to violate two laws simultaneously)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this bill do anything to change the &#8220;Rule of Two&#8221; (the rather silly precedent that drivers don&#8217;t get charged for violating a law; rather they have to violate two laws simultaneously)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dynamic Mumeshantz</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/comment-page-1/#comment-185591</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dynamic Mumeshantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=127241#comment-185591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also love to see the City Council or State push thru a bill that states that ANY crime committed while driving with a suspended license is not able to be dismissed or plea bargained.  EVER.  Whatever you do you must pay the fine and do the time.  No mitigating circumstances, no dropping charges. After all - if you can prove a license was suspended it should be case closed.  My mouth is always wide open when I read that a suspended license case is dismissed for one reason or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also love to see the City Council or State push thru a bill that states that ANY crime committed while driving with a suspended license is not able to be dismissed or plea bargained.  EVER.  Whatever you do you must pay the fine and do the time.  No mitigating circumstances, no dropping charges. After all &#8211; if you can prove a license was suspended it should be case closed.  My mouth is always wide open when I read that a suspended license case is dismissed for one reason or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric McClure</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2010/01/13/bill-to-protect-pedestrians-and-cyclists-will-resurface-in-albany/comment-page-1/#comment-185581</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=127241#comment-185581</guid>
		<description>Case Study #1: Dennis Blum, yesterday&#039;s sun-blinded Queens driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Case Study #1: Dennis Blum, yesterday&#8217;s sun-blinded Queens driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

