<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Reason to Give Thanks: State DOT Won&#8217;t Widen the Deegan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Willinger</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162661</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Willinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162661</guid>
		<description>&quot;i&#039;m totally loving it. like a mickey-d&#039;s dollar menu mcdouble! (what?)&quot;

How telling that you favor artery cloggers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;i&#8217;m totally loving it. like a mickey-d&#8217;s dollar menu mcdouble! (what?)&#8221;</p>
<p>How telling that you favor artery cloggers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162491</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162491</guid>
		<description>Actually, instead of getting rid of on/off ramps, I would propose boulevardization, like West street/9A on the west side south of 65th street with a two way protected bike lane along side!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, instead of getting rid of on/off ramps, I would propose boulevardization, like West street/9A on the west side south of 65th street with a two way protected bike lane along side!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence Eckerson Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162401</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence Eckerson Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162401</guid>
		<description>Peter: I believe it has begun!  Here ye!  Here ye!  (Now what do we say to the NYS DOT?  They do deserve credit for backing down....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter: I believe it has begun!  Here ye!  Here ye!  (Now what do we say to the NYS DOT?  They do deserve credit for backing down&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162351</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162351</guid>
		<description>great news!

i&#039;m totally loving it. like a mickey-d&#039;s dollar menu mcdouble! (what?)

i&#039;d love to see the Sheridan Expressway come down. i wonder if we can chip in support from SF, somehow. any ideas? can we at least write some letters? not sure how much money we have out here -- nobody has jobs, here. 3rd highest unemployment in the country, and we&#039;re just getting warmed up. but we have some extra time on our hands!  :)

i&#039;d also like to start talking about removing existing highways in other places -- all the highways that enter San Francisco, for instance -- so they can be used in more healthy and productive ways -- ways that actually benefit the city instead of harm it.

i want to start the process of reclaiming highway space by closing down on-ramps and off-ramps to/from highways that leave from and drop into areas of the city that are particularly congested with &#039;soft traffic&#039; -- humans, either walking or biking -- often on their way to/from transit. once we manage to make these places more healthy and vital and livable, then we go onto the next area of town that the highway has destroyed. eventually, the re-vitalization process will become self-evident and self-reinforcing, with the utility of the highway greatly diminished with each on-ramp/off-ramp that is closed. in that way, it&#039;ll be similar to what GM did to the electric streetcar networks, but we&#039;ll be helping our cities rather than harming them. 

let the second national freeway revolt begin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great news!</p>
<p>i&#8217;m totally loving it. like a mickey-d&#8217;s dollar menu mcdouble! (what?)</p>
<p>i&#8217;d love to see the Sheridan Expressway come down. i wonder if we can chip in support from SF, somehow. any ideas? can we at least write some letters? not sure how much money we have out here &#8212; nobody has jobs, here. 3rd highest unemployment in the country, and we&#8217;re just getting warmed up. but we have some extra time on our hands!  <img src='http://www.streetsblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>i&#8217;d also like to start talking about removing existing highways in other places &#8212; all the highways that enter San Francisco, for instance &#8212; so they can be used in more healthy and productive ways &#8212; ways that actually benefit the city instead of harm it.</p>
<p>i want to start the process of reclaiming highway space by closing down on-ramps and off-ramps to/from highways that leave from and drop into areas of the city that are particularly congested with &#8216;soft traffic&#8217; &#8212; humans, either walking or biking &#8212; often on their way to/from transit. once we manage to make these places more healthy and vital and livable, then we go onto the next area of town that the highway has destroyed. eventually, the re-vitalization process will become self-evident and self-reinforcing, with the utility of the highway greatly diminished with each on-ramp/off-ramp that is closed. in that way, it&#8217;ll be similar to what GM did to the electric streetcar networks, but we&#8217;ll be helping our cities rather than harming them. </p>
<p>let the second national freeway revolt begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Willinger</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162321</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Willinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162321</guid>
		<description>Developer seeking to maintain highway wall wins for now:

http://cos-mobile.blogspot.com/2009/11/policymaking-steered-to-maintain-wall.html

Mott Haven deserves better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Developer seeking to maintain highway wall wins for now:</p>
<p><a href="http://cos-mobile.blogspot.com/2009/11/policymaking-steered-to-maintain-wall.html" rel="nofollow">http://cos-mobile.blogspot.com/2009/11/policymaking-steered-to-maintain-wall.html</a></p>
<p>Mott Haven deserves better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162291</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162291</guid>
		<description>I think the East River greenway esplanade project is about $125m. If that money were just sitting ready to be used, I bet that would help move the City and State to clear up the stupid DEC permit to keep the caisons in place permanently...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the East River greenway esplanade project is about $125m. If that money were just sitting ready to be used, I bet that would help move the City and State to clear up the stupid DEC permit to keep the caisons in place permanently&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vnm</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162281</link>
		<dc:creator>vnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162281</guid>
		<description>Thanks NYSDOT! This is terrific news!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks NYSDOT! This is terrific news!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lydon</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162271</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162271</guid>
		<description>Great news! Congratulations to all who fought hard to oppose such a unnecessary and unhealthy allocation of taxpayer dollars. The message from the people is clearly this: Fix-it first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news! Congratulations to all who fought hard to oppose such a unnecessary and unhealthy allocation of taxpayer dollars. The message from the people is clearly this: Fix-it first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/11/24/a-reason-to-give-thanks-state-dot-wont-widen-the-deegan/comment-page-1/#comment-162261</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=100541#comment-162261</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a second thought: figure out an administrative way to build car-free &quot;streets&quot; (read: greenway) to better access the waterfront. There are a few decrepit, abandoned lots along the river that have direct water access. What better to look at from a congested expressway than a flock of pedestrians moving faster than you are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a second thought: figure out an administrative way to build car-free &#8220;streets&#8221; (read: greenway) to better access the waterfront. There are a few decrepit, abandoned lots along the river that have direct water access. What better to look at from a congested expressway than a flock of pedestrians moving faster than you are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

