<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much Would Most People Pay For a Shorter Commute?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/how-much-would-most-people-pay-for-a-shorter-commute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/how-much-would-most-people-pay-for-a-shorter-commute/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/how-much-would-most-people-pay-for-a-shorter-commute/comment-page-1/#comment-117951</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=44631#comment-117951</guid>
		<description>Yes I was just commenting on how Park Smart should be called &quot;Shoppers Incentive&quot; or something.

Congestion Pricing was a terrible name - two negatives. Should&#039;ve been called something like &quot;Speed Pass&quot; or &quot;Clean Commute.&quot;

&quot;Green Light for Midtown&quot; was pretty good and seems to have worked for Broadway. It&#039;s all about how you spin it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I was just commenting on how Park Smart should be called &#8220;Shoppers Incentive&#8221; or something.</p>
<p>Congestion Pricing was a terrible name &#8211; two negatives. Should&#8217;ve been called something like &#8220;Speed Pass&#8221; or &#8220;Clean Commute.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Green Light for Midtown&#8221; was pretty good and seems to have worked for Broadway. It&#8217;s all about how you spin it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/how-much-would-most-people-pay-for-a-shorter-commute/comment-page-1/#comment-116121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=44631#comment-116121</guid>
		<description>If the typical commute time is 16.7 miles in only 31 minutes, shaving that 15 minutes off would mean increasing average speed from 32 mph to 62 mph. Unlikely, unless respondents both live and work at highway rest stops.

My interpretation is that the time that the survey respondents are asked to value is time spent in traffic delays, which according to IBM averaged about one hour in duration in 2008. But 14% of drivers didn&#039;t report a single traffic delay during the last year, and the report doesn&#039;t make it clear how many delays the typical driver suffers in a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the typical commute time is 16.7 miles in only 31 minutes, shaving that 15 minutes off would mean increasing average speed from 32 mph to 62 mph. Unlikely, unless respondents both live and work at highway rest stops.</p>
<p>My interpretation is that the time that the survey respondents are asked to value is time spent in traffic delays, which according to IBM averaged about one hour in duration in 2008. But 14% of drivers didn&#8217;t report a single traffic delay during the last year, and the report doesn&#8217;t make it clear how many delays the typical driver suffers in a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vnm</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/10/how-much-would-most-people-pay-for-a-shorter-commute/comment-page-1/#comment-116111</link>
		<dc:creator>vnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=44631#comment-116111</guid>
		<description>36.5% of respondents are willing to pay between $10 and $20 for 15 minutes a day over what length of time?  

I imagine they&#039;re saying they&#039;d be willing to pay $10 to $20 per month if their daily commute were shortened by 15 minutes.  If they&#039;re saying they&#039;d be willing to pay $10 to $20 &lt;em&gt;per day&lt;/em&gt; then we&#039;re talking about $330 per month assuming 22 workdays in a month and $15 as the amount paid.  If we&#039;re talking about $10 to $20 per each 15-minute increment, we&#039;re talking about $660 a month if they&#039;re able to save a half hour per day.

Of course, none of this applies to time polluter &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/08/18/time-polluting-daily-news-honcho-goes-public/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ed Fay&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36.5% of respondents are willing to pay between $10 and $20 for 15 minutes a day over what length of time?  </p>
<p>I imagine they&#8217;re saying they&#8217;d be willing to pay $10 to $20 per month if their daily commute were shortened by 15 minutes.  If they&#8217;re saying they&#8217;d be willing to pay $10 to $20 <em>per day</em> then we&#8217;re talking about $330 per month assuming 22 workdays in a month and $15 as the amount paid.  If we&#8217;re talking about $10 to $20 per each 15-minute increment, we&#8217;re talking about $660 a month if they&#8217;re able to save a half hour per day.</p>
<p>Of course, none of this applies to time polluter <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/08/18/time-polluting-daily-news-honcho-goes-public/" rel="nofollow">Ed Fay</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

