<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eyes on the Street: Kent Avenue Progress Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redeapedestrian</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-120911</link>
		<dc:creator>Redeapedestrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-120911</guid>
		<description>This change dumps all south bound Kent traffic on to Wythe, past 2 schools, 2 preschools and 2 playgrounds. If you are against this change, please sign the petition and tell the DOT what you think:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/keep-kent-avenue-2-ways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This change dumps all south bound Kent traffic on to Wythe, past 2 schools, 2 preschools and 2 playgrounds. If you are against this change, please sign the petition and tell the DOT what you think:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/keep-kent-avenue-2-ways" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/keep-kent-avenue-2-ways</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zvi</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-119721</link>
		<dc:creator>Zvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-119721</guid>
		<description>As a Montreal cyclist, I can confirm that Montreal is a relatively good place to be a cyclist. Personally I am not a big fan of bi-directional bike lanes as the number of potential conflicts at intersections grows exponentially. Given the large number of one-way streets here, I prefer the one-lane reverse-direction bike lanes, with the street having &#039;bicycle sharrows&#039; for bicyclists going in the same direction as the traffic. In the last few weeks a huge number of painted bike lanes have been added.... Much work still to be done at intersections.

I was just in NYC last week and was actually quite surprised at how little infrastructure was in place, especially given all of the media attention that the NYC efforts have been getting. The on-street bicycle parking shelters had space for at most a dozen bicycles! My son&#039;s elementary school added over 100 bicycle parking spaces this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Montreal cyclist, I can confirm that Montreal is a relatively good place to be a cyclist. Personally I am not a big fan of bi-directional bike lanes as the number of potential conflicts at intersections grows exponentially. Given the large number of one-way streets here, I prefer the one-lane reverse-direction bike lanes, with the street having &#8216;bicycle sharrows&#8217; for bicyclists going in the same direction as the traffic. In the last few weeks a huge number of painted bike lanes have been added&#8230;. Much work still to be done at intersections.</p>
<p>I was just in NYC last week and was actually quite surprised at how little infrastructure was in place, especially given all of the media attention that the NYC efforts have been getting. The on-street bicycle parking shelters had space for at most a dozen bicycles! My son&#8217;s elementary school added over 100 bicycle parking spaces this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-119701</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-119701</guid>
		<description>I went to school in Montreal (unfortunately before BIXI!) and looved biking there.  It truly shows how infrastructure and attitude can make a city bike friendly.

The drivers are just as insane as in New York.  I saw a driver barrel down a one way street between two lanes swerving back and forth and hitting about 6 cars (including the car I was in!) before leaving my field of vision.  

There are psychopathic idiots everywhere.  The difference is in Montreal, bikes are expected and seen as valid users of the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to school in Montreal (unfortunately before BIXI!) and looved biking there.  It truly shows how infrastructure and attitude can make a city bike friendly.</p>
<p>The drivers are just as insane as in New York.  I saw a driver barrel down a one way street between two lanes swerving back and forth and hitting about 6 cars (including the car I was in!) before leaving my field of vision.  </p>
<p>There are psychopathic idiots everywhere.  The difference is in Montreal, bikes are expected and seen as valid users of the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-119691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-119691</guid>
		<description>My subjective opinion is that the bike lanes are there primarily as traffic calming, not as actual bicycle thoroughfares. I support this variety of “street theater,” which uses amenities like bicycle lanes and bulb-outs to slow down through traffic, but that doesn&#039;t mean that I would endorse actually using those “amenities” for their ostensible purpose.  Kaja is right: for riders who are comfortable in city traffic, easier riding is found on the parallel one-way streets, Wythe and Berry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My subjective opinion is that the bike lanes are there primarily as traffic calming, not as actual bicycle thoroughfares. I support this variety of “street theater,” which uses amenities like bicycle lanes and bulb-outs to slow down through traffic, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that I would endorse actually using those “amenities” for their ostensible purpose.  Kaja is right: for riders who are comfortable in city traffic, easier riding is found on the parallel one-way streets, Wythe and Berry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaja</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-119661</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-119661</guid>
		<description>@gptcyclist -- it&#039;s certainly too narrow if someone&#039;s coming at you down the middle, or if a car&#039;s parked illegally in it. I think single-file bikes at reasonable speeds can fit.

But I&#039;m the sort of guy who passes you, and I can&#039;t do that in the Kent lane if there&#039;s any volume. So I may actually stick to wythe and berry up to banker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gptcyclist &#8212; it&#8217;s certainly too narrow if someone&#8217;s coming at you down the middle, or if a car&#8217;s parked illegally in it. I think single-file bikes at reasonable speeds can fit.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m the sort of guy who passes you, and I can&#8217;t do that in the Kent lane if there&#8217;s any volume. So I may actually stick to wythe and berry up to banker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a cyclist</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-119631</link>
		<dc:creator>a cyclist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-119631</guid>
		<description>Montreal is a great city for bikers. Plenty of bikes to share/rent for free/cheap, plenty of protected two way lanes. Everyone has a bike but the lanes are rarely crowded and the bikers are civil if not friendly. NYC has some catching up to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montreal is a great city for bikers. Plenty of bikes to share/rent for free/cheap, plenty of protected two way lanes. Everyone has a bike but the lanes are rarely crowded and the bikers are civil if not friendly. NYC has some catching up to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-119611</link>
		<dc:creator>ED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-119611</guid>
		<description>@ greenpoint cyclist - 

Not wide enough??!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ greenpoint cyclist &#8211; </p>
<p>Not wide enough??!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmc</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-119431</link>
		<dc:creator>jmc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-119431</guid>
		<description>I just got back from Montreal where I rode in 2 way bike lanes. They are really the best option. For the first time I was biking in a city where I felt safe, as I never had cars coming up from behind me. One way bike lanes leave bicyclists unable to see the cars that are overtaking them. With two way lanes, I was able to head into traffic, and therefore it was confidence building. When I was riding along with traffic I felt protected by the cyclists going the other way. 

The lanes in Montreal were narrow, but they encouraged cyclists to go at a reasonable velocity and not behave like mini-Lance Armstrongs. (To the cyclists who refuse to mellow out, I suggest you think what would happen if drivers behaved like Mario Andretti!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back from Montreal where I rode in 2 way bike lanes. They are really the best option. For the first time I was biking in a city where I felt safe, as I never had cars coming up from behind me. One way bike lanes leave bicyclists unable to see the cars that are overtaking them. With two way lanes, I was able to head into traffic, and therefore it was confidence building. When I was riding along with traffic I felt protected by the cyclists going the other way. </p>
<p>The lanes in Montreal were narrow, but they encouraged cyclists to go at a reasonable velocity and not behave like mini-Lance Armstrongs. (To the cyclists who refuse to mellow out, I suggest you think what would happen if drivers behaved like Mario Andretti!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenpoint_cyclist</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-117361</link>
		<dc:creator>greenpoint_cyclist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-117361</guid>
		<description>as someone who rides Kent Ave all the time, i&#039;m not crazy about the new setup. first of all, the green lane is too narrow for 2-way bike traffic. i don&#039;t feel comfortable riding in it. and now that the road is one-way &amp; all split up, it feels too narrow to ride in traffic (cars can&#039;t go around me). and the parking being in the middle of the street just creates more opportunities for surprises with the cars. i liked it better with the prior improvements, where the street was nice &amp; wide, 2-way, and well-paved (except for where they tore it up for the new high rises &amp; didn&#039;t repave well) because well-paved streets mean fewer obstacles for cyclists &amp; fewer surprises from us since we don&#039;t have to swerve to avoid street hazards. the white bike lanes already added seemed sufficient to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as someone who rides Kent Ave all the time, i&#8217;m not crazy about the new setup. first of all, the green lane is too narrow for 2-way bike traffic. i don&#8217;t feel comfortable riding in it. and now that the road is one-way &amp; all split up, it feels too narrow to ride in traffic (cars can&#8217;t go around me). and the parking being in the middle of the street just creates more opportunities for surprises with the cars. i liked it better with the prior improvements, where the street was nice &amp; wide, 2-way, and well-paved (except for where they tore it up for the new high rises &amp; didn&#8217;t repave well) because well-paved streets mean fewer obstacles for cyclists &amp; fewer surprises from us since we don&#8217;t have to swerve to avoid street hazards. the white bike lanes already added seemed sufficient to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-117291</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-117291</guid>
		<description>Regarding Kent&#039;s new one way traffic pattern: While it serves the continuity of the bike path along the waterfront, it is directly negatively affecting motorists with highter traffic jams, and a new pattern of promoting truck traffic driving directly through increasingly residential neighborhoods. Malleable is a good word...the  bikepath should also have to be flexible in making sure that neighboring communities are notd affected. I am a Supporter of the path and...also of returning Kent to a two way....or finding another way to keep trucks on the major arteries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Kent&#8217;s new one way traffic pattern: While it serves the continuity of the bike path along the waterfront, it is directly negatively affecting motorists with highter traffic jams, and a new pattern of promoting truck traffic driving directly through increasingly residential neighborhoods. Malleable is a good word&#8230;the  bikepath should also have to be flexible in making sure that neighboring communities are notd affected. I am a Supporter of the path and&#8230;also of returning Kent to a two way&#8230;.or finding another way to keep trucks on the major arteries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaja</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-112341</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-112341</guid>
		<description>paco i think you just got trolled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paco i think you just got trolled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teresa toro</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-112251</link>
		<dc:creator>teresa toro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-112251</guid>
		<description>Perfectly said, Paco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfectly said, Paco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paco</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-112161</link>
		<dc:creator>paco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-112161</guid>
		<description>michael1... yes... it was two way, now its one way. but bike radicalism? that sounds like you&#039;re giving it a negative connotation. I&#039;d agree it&#039;s bike radicalism, but that&#039;s the way it should be. The road is being redesigned to provide more safety for all users, drivers, cyclists, peds, and now will offer a glimpse of the future brooklyn waterfront greenway... plus, if you look back at your history... just a few years before kent was two way, it was again a one way street. Roads may look sturdy but they are as malleable as anything else and should always be adjusted and improved when worthwhile projects come along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael1&#8230; yes&#8230; it was two way, now its one way. but bike radicalism? that sounds like you&#8217;re giving it a negative connotation. I&#8217;d agree it&#8217;s bike radicalism, but that&#8217;s the way it should be. The road is being redesigned to provide more safety for all users, drivers, cyclists, peds, and now will offer a glimpse of the future brooklyn waterfront greenway&#8230; plus, if you look back at your history&#8230; just a few years before kent was two way, it was again a one way street. Roads may look sturdy but they are as malleable as anything else and should always be adjusted and improved when worthwhile projects come along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aliostuni</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-112081</link>
		<dc:creator>aliostuni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-112081</guid>
		<description>Iterate on 5th Avenue in Manhattan, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iterate on 5th Avenue in Manhattan, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael1</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-112071</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-112071</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but they just convert Kent Avenue into a one-way northbound? Wasn&#039;t that a two-way street? This is bike radicalism!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but they just convert Kent Avenue into a one-way northbound? Wasn&#8217;t that a two-way street? This is bike radicalism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cloudsofviolet</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-112061</link>
		<dc:creator>cloudsofviolet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-112061</guid>
		<description>will there be striping on the bike lane to divide it in 2 parts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will there be striping on the bike lane to divide it in 2 parts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfs</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-112041</link>
		<dc:creator>mfs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 03:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-112041</guid>
		<description>The proposal is that from Flushing to BQE the route is supposed to be on the sidewalk, then they are taking away a lane of traffic on Williamsburgh Street to allow a two-way protected lane to allow a safe connection to Flushing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposal is that from Flushing to BQE the route is supposed to be on the sidewalk, then they are taking away a lane of traffic on Williamsburgh Street to allow a two-way protected lane to allow a safe connection to Flushing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geck</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-111981</link>
		<dc:creator>Geck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-111981</guid>
		<description>Any word on Prospect Park West?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any word on Prospect Park West?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaja</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-111961</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-111961</guid>
		<description>This is beautiful. And it begs the question:

Flushing to Clymer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is beautiful. And it begs the question:</p>
<p>Flushing to Clymer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rina</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/09/02/eyes-on-the-street-kent-avenue-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-111951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=40551#comment-111951</guid>
		<description>Mega!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mega!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

