<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: STAA Tuned: Transpo Bill Leaves Funding Question Hanging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/23/staa-tuned-transpo-bill-leaves-funding-question-hanging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/23/staa-tuned-transpo-bill-leaves-funding-question-hanging/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shemp</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/23/staa-tuned-transpo-bill-leaves-funding-question-hanging/comment-page-1/#comment-72391</link>
		<dc:creator>Shemp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6771#comment-72391</guid>
		<description>This &quot;everything&#039;s good minus funding&quot; account of the bill is not very analytical.  

Several potential problems with the &quot;good&quot; bullets above:

The bill links the Office of Intermodalism to minor funding programs, so could represent institutionalizing the bike/ped funding ghetto treatment practiced by most states.

Empowering metropolitan planning organizations is a fantasy of Congresspeople and beltway advocates with little experience of how transportation politics plays out in real life in the 50 states.  The metropolitan planning process is bullshit in 99% of metro areas and fixing every case with blanket legislation isn&#039;t going to work.  

&quot;Depoliticizing&quot; huge funding decisions is an extension of this fantasy. As far as I can tell, the infrastructure banks will mainly offer credit, not hard cash, which won&#039;t be that useful for states that already do a lot of bonding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;everything&#8217;s good minus funding&#8221; account of the bill is not very analytical.  </p>
<p>Several potential problems with the &#8220;good&#8221; bullets above:</p>
<p>The bill links the Office of Intermodalism to minor funding programs, so could represent institutionalizing the bike/ped funding ghetto treatment practiced by most states.</p>
<p>Empowering metropolitan planning organizations is a fantasy of Congresspeople and beltway advocates with little experience of how transportation politics plays out in real life in the 50 states.  The metropolitan planning process is bullshit in 99% of metro areas and fixing every case with blanket legislation isn&#8217;t going to work.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Depoliticizing&#8221; huge funding decisions is an extension of this fantasy. As far as I can tell, the infrastructure banks will mainly offer credit, not hard cash, which won&#8217;t be that useful for states that already do a lot of bonding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

