<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Urbanism, Old Urbanism and &#8220;Creative Destruction&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:40:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another, different Stapleton resident</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-76991</link>
		<dc:creator>Another, different Stapleton resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-76991</guid>
		<description>I just moved to Stapleton two months ago and we love it. It&#039;s a great development with lots of families, and yes we do like parks and no we&#039;re not a bunch of morons who can&#039;t understand &quot;new urbanism&quot;. Yes, there are some big box developments around the fringes, they were some of the first things put up after the new airport opened, long before the rest of the development started going. But in between there is a nice little neighborhood center with some independent shops and great restaurants. This is a mile from my house and I live on the northeastern edge of Stapleton. Yes, I ride my bike there. Any weekend you&#039;ll see tons of bikes, bike trailers and walkers in this area.  A lot of people take the bus and a lot of us are looking forward to the Stapleton light rail stop once Fastraks finally gets completed. 

What would you rather have a bunch of suburban sprawl and culdesacs? this development is only five or six miles from downtown, depending on whether you are on the east or west side. Most of the commenters come off like a bunch of know-it-all elitists. Yes, I&#039;m a mom and I enjoy the park and gee, I even understand the concepts of new urbanism and good planning. I think the developer did quite well considering they also have to make money and it&#039;s not even built out yet. Maybe you think 99% of us don&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; but I bet it&#039;s more because we don&#039;t like listening to a bunch of &quot;holier than thou&quot; preachy types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just moved to Stapleton two months ago and we love it. It's a great development with lots of families, and yes we do like parks and no we're not a bunch of morons who can't understand "new urbanism". Yes, there are some big box developments around the fringes, they were some of the first things put up after the new airport opened, long before the rest of the development started going. But in between there is a nice little neighborhood center with some independent shops and great restaurants. This is a mile from my house and I live on the northeastern edge of Stapleton. Yes, I ride my bike there. Any weekend you'll see tons of bikes, bike trailers and walkers in this area.  A lot of people take the bus and a lot of us are looking forward to the Stapleton light rail stop once Fastraks finally gets completed. </p>
<p>What would you rather have a bunch of suburban sprawl and culdesacs? this development is only five or six miles from downtown, depending on whether you are on the east or west side. Most of the commenters come off like a bunch of know-it-all elitists. Yes, I'm a mom and I enjoy the park and gee, I even understand the concepts of new urbanism and good planning. I think the developer did quite well considering they also have to make money and it's not even built out yet. Maybe you think 99% of us don't "get it" but I bet it's more because we don't like listening to a bunch of "holier than thou" preachy types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manchaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-74021</link>
		<dc:creator>manchaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-74021</guid>
		<description>I was at CNU 17 and visited Stapleton which I found to be far short of the mark - the so called arterials are way too wide, the architecture leaves a bit to be desired and the TWO big box centers were a shocker.  Nonetheless, Stapleton is much better than most communities built in America in the last 60 years.  It does have a palpable sense of communities - and it does have some elements of mixed use.  The schools in particular are impressive in how they are fully embedded into the community and they actually can be reached by walking MOSTLY safe and comfortable streets.  In evaluating an evolving community like Stapleton it important to understand that this community is almost 10 years old and that the UNDERSTANDING of how to design and finance an urban place has evolved significantly in that time.  Even with that evolution the engineers - I am an engineer - (from the city) are still demanding their ridiculous and bogus traffic study that predict 30,000 vehicles on the main arterial in Stapleton (hence the oversided 4 lanes) and the the city still do not understand basic things like how an alley operates so in order to build narrow alleys the developers had to make the alleys private.  The point is there are many back stories to what we see on the ground.  The think about Stapleton is that it sets the stage for beating back some of the antediluvian codes and financial regulations that still makes it so difficult to do good urbanism in American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at CNU 17 and visited Stapleton which I found to be far short of the mark - the so called arterials are way too wide, the architecture leaves a bit to be desired and the TWO big box centers were a shocker.  Nonetheless, Stapleton is much better than most communities built in America in the last 60 years.  It does have a palpable sense of communities - and it does have some elements of mixed use.  The schools in particular are impressive in how they are fully embedded into the community and they actually can be reached by walking MOSTLY safe and comfortable streets.  In evaluating an evolving community like Stapleton it important to understand that this community is almost 10 years old and that the UNDERSTANDING of how to design and finance an urban place has evolved significantly in that time.  Even with that evolution the engineers - I am an engineer - (from the city) are still demanding their ridiculous and bogus traffic study that predict 30,000 vehicles on the main arterial in Stapleton (hence the oversided 4 lanes) and the the city still do not understand basic things like how an alley operates so in order to build narrow alleys the developers had to make the alleys private.  The point is there are many back stories to what we see on the ground.  The think about Stapleton is that it sets the stage for beating back some of the antediluvian codes and financial regulations that still makes it so difficult to do good urbanism in American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stapleton Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70821</link>
		<dc:creator>Stapleton Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70821</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve tried to explain before, it&#039;s a work in progress...  In some spots of Stapleton, it is truly a walkable community and you have everything within reach.  Other spots will need to finish development before the implementation of neighborhood-wide integration of shops, retail, easy access to transit, etc, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I've tried to explain before, it's a work in progress...  In some spots of Stapleton, it is truly a walkable community and you have everything within reach.  Other spots will need to finish development before the implementation of neighborhood-wide integration of shops, retail, easy access to transit, etc, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70060</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70060</guid>
		<description>It sounds like Stapleton Resident is saying that it is there now - a true walkable, urban community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like Stapleton Resident is saying that it is there now - a true walkable, urban community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70049</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70049</guid>
		<description>I believe you that Stapleton has the potential to be a true walkable, urban community.  We&#039;re just saying that it&#039;s not there now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you that Stapleton has the potential to be a true walkable, urban community.  We're just saying that it's not there now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stapleton Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70047</link>
		<dc:creator>Stapleton Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70047</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I keep reading posts as I do yard work...

The comments about income levels is also insulting.  I live in an area where there is a 1 million dollar house, $300k - $700k houses, and affordable low income condos for 120k all within the same 5 block area of each other.   2 blocks from my house will be a low income building or low income townhomes in the next couple years.  It is only 1 block from 900k houses.  

Ridiculous comments.  These people are similar to making comments on the design and functionality of a skyscraper BEFORE it&#039;s finished and before seeing the plans for it.   The Forest City / Stapleton Denver site does not explain the uses of everything in Stapleton.

Founders Green is named after all the Denver community members and residents that founded the new Stapleton community and wrote the Stapleton GREEN master plan book - which Forest City has to adhere to and has to get city and community approval before making any changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I keep reading posts as I do yard work...</p>
<p>The comments about income levels is also insulting.  I live in an area where there is a 1 million dollar house, $300k - $700k houses, and affordable low income condos for 120k all within the same 5 block area of each other.   2 blocks from my house will be a low income building or low income townhomes in the next couple years.  It is only 1 block from 900k houses.  </p>
<p>Ridiculous comments.  These people are similar to making comments on the design and functionality of a skyscraper BEFORE it's finished and before seeing the plans for it.   The Forest City / Stapleton Denver site does not explain the uses of everything in Stapleton.</p>
<p>Founders Green is named after all the Denver community members and residents that founded the new Stapleton community and wrote the Stapleton GREEN master plan book - which Forest City has to adhere to and has to get city and community approval before making any changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stapleton Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70046</link>
		<dc:creator>Stapleton Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70046</guid>
		<description>Another response... Stapleton&#039;s pools ARE open to the public.  Stapleton residents have to pay for a season pool pass and outside residents pay a fee for use each time.  Other Denver city pools do the same.  These pools are very nice and expensive to keep up.  Stapleton residents paid for the infrastructure of these pools, so they are fairly given the discount...just like city residents in other parts of Denver are given discounts over non-city residents.  Everything at Stapleton is open to everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another response... Stapleton's pools ARE open to the public.  Stapleton residents have to pay for a season pool pass and outside residents pay a fee for use each time.  Other Denver city pools do the same.  These pools are very nice and expensive to keep up.  Stapleton residents paid for the infrastructure of these pools, so they are fairly given the discount...just like city residents in other parts of Denver are given discounts over non-city residents.  Everything at Stapleton is open to everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stapleton Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70045</link>
		<dc:creator>Stapleton Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70045</guid>
		<description>Also, the bus stop that moved only moved 1 block away.  I see a lot of folks take the bus here.  I see people walk with their suitcases to the park and ride to take the airport shuttle.  There is a carpooling club here and there has been a car sharing program.  Once again, quick to judge before becoming completely informed.  

More and more streets will be integrated with the surrounding neighborhood, and many streets already are.  

I can&#039;t believe the ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the bus stop that moved only moved 1 block away.  I see a lot of folks take the bus here.  I see people walk with their suitcases to the park and ride to take the airport shuttle.  There is a carpooling club here and there has been a car sharing program.  Once again, quick to judge before becoming completely informed.  </p>
<p>More and more streets will be integrated with the surrounding neighborhood, and many streets already are.  </p>
<p>I can't believe the ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stapleton Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70044</link>
		<dc:creator>Stapleton Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70044</guid>
		<description>By the way, Stapleton builders are all built green builders (the only master plan community to be completely built green in this part of the western U.S), they are all energy star certified, and 2 builders are completely solar power standard (including my builder).  They all have the high construction standards - higher than the county (i.e. 2X6 construction, much higher R-levels, etc).  These homes are built well!  There are also quite a few Stapleton commercial buildings that are leed certified (including the JC Penney).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Stapleton builders are all built green builders (the only master plan community to be completely built green in this part of the western U.S), they are all energy star certified, and 2 builders are completely solar power standard (including my builder).  They all have the high construction standards - higher than the county (i.e. 2X6 construction, much higher R-levels, etc).  These homes are built well!  There are also quite a few Stapleton commercial buildings that are leed certified (including the JC Penney).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stapleton Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70043</link>
		<dc:creator>Stapleton Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70043</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the uneducated comments on here.  As a long time Stapleton resident, I have to say that a lot of folks are quick to judge a new community that still has to grow to the master plan of 30,000 expected residents and 30,000 expected workers.  We&#039;re not even close to being complete (about 1/3 complete).  This is not a simple redeveloped area.  Its a HUGE redevelopment project.  You have to start somewhere and it has to take time for the density to occur.  Stapleton&#039;s vision is not even close to realization.  Forest City actually is requiring even smaller lots for their single family builders now (it was 4000sf -- now we are looking at 3500 sq ft single family lots).  There IS an integrated grid with the rest of the city and those &quot;blocked&quot; streets are SOON to open to the rest of Denver and Aurora. There has simply been road funding, traffic planning issues, and intergovernmental challenges with Aurora and Denver that delayed it.  There will soon be a highway interchange in the middle of Stapleton.  There is a commuter rail station scheduled to open in a few years just 3 blocks from my house that will take me to the airport (I travel a lot) or downtown Denver in no time.   

The entire development plan still calls for nearby neighborhood shops and retail within walking distance of all homes.  The power centers and large shopping centers you see now are just the beginning and at the EDGES of Stapleton.  Once Stapleton grows and becomes more dense, the planned and required neighborhood shops will be integrated.  This is why you see so many empty lots because Forest City is holding them for multi-use purposes (i.e. street level retail with affordable housing above).  This is especially true near the old tower.  The office buildings are planned to have retail on the bottom as well.  Residents and developers are coming together to combine uses.  A Storage company wanted to come to Stapleton, but residents and the developer said he had to have a few retail spaces at street level on his property if he wanted his storage center here....so he had to comply.  The NEW storage center is now here.  My neighbor walks 3 blocks to get their dry cleaning done at this storage center/dry cleaning spot WITHIN the neighborhood (there are also a couple more empty retail spaces in this same spot after recently opening)...and this is no where near the shopping centers and not at the Town Center.  It is WITHIN Stapleton.  There is also separate small retail/office/restaurant mixed-use area on the south side of Stapleton that many residents enjoy (again, not at a shopping center and within a short walking distance of hundreds of homes).  Across the street from this is a live/work building where several folks have their business on the ground level and live in a beautiful multi-story unit above.  My friend&#039;s insurance agent is one of those people that has his insurance agency on the street and he and his family live above.  Most of my neighbors walk or bike to the Town Center to get food, walk to the park to enjoy the outside or the many activities (farmers market, outdoor movie, carnival, etc), or take advantage of the other retail and business establishmets.  My mother just made a comment last weekend while visiting by saying, &quot;Jeesh, there are so many people out and about walking to somewhere around here.&quot;  People here are teased if they take the car to anything that&#039;s within 1 mile.  I see Stapleton residents with grocery bags in red wagons walking home with their children in strollers.  I have pretty much everything I need within 1 mile (grocery store, my barber, my insurance agent, my dentist, 1 doctor I have, my vet, other various retail stores and businesses I need, my cleaners (not the one at the storage center), and many restaurants that I ride my bike or walk to) and I am in the heart of Stapleton -- NOT at the edge like the shopping centers are.  These large REGIONAL shopping centers are supposed to serve a REGIONAL area of Denver metro - not just Stapleton.  3 friends of mine that live in Stapleton ride their bikes to work downtown  Downtown IS close.  It&#039;s only a 10-15 minute drive and 25-30 minute bike ride.  One of them called me to pick him up the other day due to a family emergency.  It took me 11 minutes to get to his office downtown.  I only use my car to go to the airport (which will change when the rail stop at Stapleton opens) and visit family in other parts of the metro area.  The new Town Center on the east side of Stapleton is still scheduled and Forest City is about to have a new natural foods grocer sign a lease (they have a signed commmittment so far) after they get a few more other retail committments.  This new town center will be surrounded by hundreds of homes.  There are 2 more Town Centers planned on top of the the other 2 (not including the 2 regional shopping centers).  

I can&#039;t see how someone believe this is suburban.  The garages are in the alley.  The lots are small.  Every possibly type of residential architecture is here.   My one block street alone is comprised of 3 builders with completely different architectural styles, and not one house on the street is duplicated.  At the end of my street are duplexes and on the other side are townhomes.  One block down are condos.  These homes and the streets they sit on look nothing like new suburban communities throughout the country.  There are several condos, duplexes, and apartments that are intermixed within the single family homes (but non-Stapletonites don&#039;t seem to distinguish the condos very well due to the good architecture).  

Like I&#039;ve said, we need to give Stapleton time to develop the mixed-used developments throughout the community that have always been planned (hence the deliberate empty lots that are scattered throughout).  The housing crisis and economy has slowed things down.  I challenge folks to actually RESEARCH the Stapleton plan that Forest City must adhere to and Denverites have actually written.... before making judgements of a development that IS STILL IN PROGRESS.  In this day and age, you think that many of America&#039;s old and nice urban communities could start off with all that density immediately?  We are talking about 4.5 square miles here!  The largest urban redevelopment in the nation.  Only slight changes have been made to the original plan.  Stapleton continues to win numerous national and international awards for its urban design, sustainability, and community efforts.  A walkable, dense, and park abundant community has occurred already for most of Stapleton....and it will only get better as time goes on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe the uneducated comments on here.  As a long time Stapleton resident, I have to say that a lot of folks are quick to judge a new community that still has to grow to the master plan of 30,000 expected residents and 30,000 expected workers.  We're not even close to being complete (about 1/3 complete).  This is not a simple redeveloped area.  Its a HUGE redevelopment project.  You have to start somewhere and it has to take time for the density to occur.  Stapleton's vision is not even close to realization.  Forest City actually is requiring even smaller lots for their single family builders now (it was 4000sf -- now we are looking at 3500 sq ft single family lots).  There IS an integrated grid with the rest of the city and those "blocked" streets are SOON to open to the rest of Denver and Aurora. There has simply been road funding, traffic planning issues, and intergovernmental challenges with Aurora and Denver that delayed it.  There will soon be a highway interchange in the middle of Stapleton.  There is a commuter rail station scheduled to open in a few years just 3 blocks from my house that will take me to the airport (I travel a lot) or downtown Denver in no time.   </p>
<p>The entire development plan still calls for nearby neighborhood shops and retail within walking distance of all homes.  The power centers and large shopping centers you see now are just the beginning and at the EDGES of Stapleton.  Once Stapleton grows and becomes more dense, the planned and required neighborhood shops will be integrated.  This is why you see so many empty lots because Forest City is holding them for multi-use purposes (i.e. street level retail with affordable housing above).  This is especially true near the old tower.  The office buildings are planned to have retail on the bottom as well.  Residents and developers are coming together to combine uses.  A Storage company wanted to come to Stapleton, but residents and the developer said he had to have a few retail spaces at street level on his property if he wanted his storage center here....so he had to comply.  The NEW storage center is now here.  My neighbor walks 3 blocks to get their dry cleaning done at this storage center/dry cleaning spot WITHIN the neighborhood (there are also a couple more empty retail spaces in this same spot after recently opening)...and this is no where near the shopping centers and not at the Town Center.  It is WITHIN Stapleton.  There is also separate small retail/office/restaurant mixed-use area on the south side of Stapleton that many residents enjoy (again, not at a shopping center and within a short walking distance of hundreds of homes).  Across the street from this is a live/work building where several folks have their business on the ground level and live in a beautiful multi-story unit above.  My friend's insurance agent is one of those people that has his insurance agency on the street and he and his family live above.  Most of my neighbors walk or bike to the Town Center to get food, walk to the park to enjoy the outside or the many activities (farmers market, outdoor movie, carnival, etc), or take advantage of the other retail and business establishmets.  My mother just made a comment last weekend while visiting by saying, "Jeesh, there are so many people out and about walking to somewhere around here."  People here are teased if they take the car to anything that's within 1 mile.  I see Stapleton residents with grocery bags in red wagons walking home with their children in strollers.  I have pretty much everything I need within 1 mile (grocery store, my barber, my insurance agent, my dentist, 1 doctor I have, my vet, other various retail stores and businesses I need, my cleaners (not the one at the storage center), and many restaurants that I ride my bike or walk to) and I am in the heart of Stapleton -- NOT at the edge like the shopping centers are.  These large REGIONAL shopping centers are supposed to serve a REGIONAL area of Denver metro - not just Stapleton.  3 friends of mine that live in Stapleton ride their bikes to work downtown  Downtown IS close.  It's only a 10-15 minute drive and 25-30 minute bike ride.  One of them called me to pick him up the other day due to a family emergency.  It took me 11 minutes to get to his office downtown.  I only use my car to go to the airport (which will change when the rail stop at Stapleton opens) and visit family in other parts of the metro area.  The new Town Center on the east side of Stapleton is still scheduled and Forest City is about to have a new natural foods grocer sign a lease (they have a signed commmittment so far) after they get a few more other retail committments.  This new town center will be surrounded by hundreds of homes.  There are 2 more Town Centers planned on top of the the other 2 (not including the 2 regional shopping centers).  </p>
<p>I can't see how someone believe this is suburban.  The garages are in the alley.  The lots are small.  Every possibly type of residential architecture is here.   My one block street alone is comprised of 3 builders with completely different architectural styles, and not one house on the street is duplicated.  At the end of my street are duplexes and on the other side are townhomes.  One block down are condos.  These homes and the streets they sit on look nothing like new suburban communities throughout the country.  There are several condos, duplexes, and apartments that are intermixed within the single family homes (but non-Stapletonites don't seem to distinguish the condos very well due to the good architecture).  </p>
<p>Like I've said, we need to give Stapleton time to develop the mixed-used developments throughout the community that have always been planned (hence the deliberate empty lots that are scattered throughout).  The housing crisis and economy has slowed things down.  I challenge folks to actually RESEARCH the Stapleton plan that Forest City must adhere to and Denverites have actually written.... before making judgements of a development that IS STILL IN PROGRESS.  In this day and age, you think that many of America's old and nice urban communities could start off with all that density immediately?  We are talking about 4.5 square miles here!  The largest urban redevelopment in the nation.  Only slight changes have been made to the original plan.  Stapleton continues to win numerous national and international awards for its urban design, sustainability, and community efforts.  A walkable, dense, and park abundant community has occurred already for most of Stapleton....and it will only get better as time goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhelie</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70041</link>
		<dc:creator>mhelie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70041</guid>
		<description>New Urbanism has been a failure everywhere there wasn&#039;t a huge capital concentration to fund it. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://emergenturbanism.com/tag/new-urbanism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;links&lt;/a&gt;) Now that the capital concentrations have evaporated, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.originalgreen.org/OG/Blog/Entries/2009/5/26_Denver_-_Valley_Forge_for_the_New_Urbanism.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New Urbanists are screaming in agony&lt;/a&gt;, facing the realization that they were not combating an unsustainable system, they were giving it a last life.

Now that it&#039;s all collapsing, they don&#039;t have a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Urbanism has been a failure everywhere there wasn't a huge capital concentration to fund it. (See <a href="http://emergenturbanism.com/tag/new-urbanism/" rel="nofollow">links</a>) Now that the capital concentrations have evaporated, the <a href="http://www.originalgreen.org/OG/Blog/Entries/2009/5/26_Denver_-_Valley_Forge_for_the_New_Urbanism.html" rel="nofollow">New Urbanists are screaming in agony</a>, facing the realization that they were not combating an unsustainable system, they were giving it a last life.</p>
<p>Now that it's all collapsing, they don't have a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70035</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70035</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I meant mass produced and likely made of cheap materials&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fair enough--and a good point. Most new neighborhoods aren&#039;t built to last, are they. I remember my brother bought a new house in the outermost exurbs of our hometown and he was complaining about the crappy construction. The best-built houses are of course in the city, but the city is largely a slum now, so... there you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I meant mass produced and likely made of cheap materials</p></blockquote>
<p>Fair enough--and a good point. Most new neighborhoods aren't built to last, are they. I remember my brother bought a new house in the outermost exurbs of our hometown and he was complaining about the crappy construction. The best-built houses are of course in the city, but the city is largely a slum now, so... there you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: цarьchitect</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70034</link>
		<dc:creator>цarьchitect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70034</guid>
		<description>Does it bother anyone here that the developer celebrates an architecture paradigm that celebrates not caring about the built environment? It’s as though delivering a desirable consumer a good to an end-user is the only value of architecture. As presented, it sounds like residents should be unconcerned with structures they interact with on a daily basis. Nobody would ever want ordinary citizens to be this disengaged from politics, even though street design has an equally real impact on daily lives as tax law. Look at the Founder’s Square: it’s completely divorced from the civic and commercial aspects of a New England commons, except in appearance. It’s just about the nice park, rather than the community factors that make the park a good asset.

I don’t think that the average person needs to understand the Transect any more than they need to understand Post-Functionalism. But they ought to understand some basic elements, what’s worth fighting for, and what the global impact of good urbanism is. Why not want these people to say “I’m glad I can see my neighbors from my porch,” “I don’t need more highway lanes,” and “It’s a good thing my kids can walk to school.” As long as New Urbanism fixates on its milquetoast commercial appeal, developments will seem rather fake and its message will be lost as just “traditionalish.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it bother anyone here that the developer celebrates an architecture paradigm that celebrates not caring about the built environment? It’s as though delivering a desirable consumer a good to an end-user is the only value of architecture. As presented, it sounds like residents should be unconcerned with structures they interact with on a daily basis. Nobody would ever want ordinary citizens to be this disengaged from politics, even though street design has an equally real impact on daily lives as tax law. Look at the Founder’s Square: it’s completely divorced from the civic and commercial aspects of a New England commons, except in appearance. It’s just about the nice park, rather than the community factors that make the park a good asset.</p>
<p>I don’t think that the average person needs to understand the Transect any more than they need to understand Post-Functionalism. But they ought to understand some basic elements, what’s worth fighting for, and what the global impact of good urbanism is. Why not want these people to say “I’m glad I can see my neighbors from my porch,” “I don’t need more highway lanes,” and “It’s a good thing my kids can walk to school.” As long as New Urbanism fixates on its milquetoast commercial appeal, developments will seem rather fake and its message will be lost as just “traditionalish.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theboy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70032</link>
		<dc:creator>theboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70032</guid>
		<description>@Steve Davis

Good suggestion.  I&#039;d like to hear what Forest City says, though I suspect it would largely the verbal equivalent of the mom, kid, dog, and park image.

Moreover, if Forest City were to say that the lower density was responding to local pols, I wouldn&#039;t believe it without other evidence.  These things are complicated and contradictory, but Forest City seems to do pretty much as it likes.  Sometimes it seems to make concessions, but rarely actually conceded on anything important.   

Also, if you walk around the place and check out how Stapleton has isolated itself from pre-existing transit service and roads, it&#039;s hard to not to conclude that Stapleton had little positive interest in transit or other alt modes.  (Tthere&#039;s a transit terminal that pre-dates the Stapleton build out that should be an easy walk from lots of houses, but the designers essentially cut it out and walled it off from everything else.)

For what it&#039;s worth, probably not much, a planner for one of the home builders told me that Forest City actually wanted less density not more, because less density is easier to sell to most of the buyers who Stapleton targeted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve Davis</p>
<p>Good suggestion.  I'd like to hear what Forest City says, though I suspect it would largely the verbal equivalent of the mom, kid, dog, and park image.</p>
<p>Moreover, if Forest City were to say that the lower density was responding to local pols, I wouldn't believe it without other evidence.  These things are complicated and contradictory, but Forest City seems to do pretty much as it likes.  Sometimes it seems to make concessions, but rarely actually conceded on anything important.   </p>
<p>Also, if you walk around the place and check out how Stapleton has isolated itself from pre-existing transit service and roads, it's hard to not to conclude that Stapleton had little positive interest in transit or other alt modes.  (Tthere's a transit terminal that pre-dates the Stapleton build out that should be an easy walk from lots of houses, but the designers essentially cut it out and walled it off from everything else.)</p>
<p>For what it's worth, probably not much, a planner for one of the home builders told me that Forest City actually wanted less density not more, because less density is easier to sell to most of the buyers who Stapleton targeted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70027</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70027</guid>
		<description>Someone should think about giving a short interview to the Forest City people and see what they say about it. I seem to remember it being another case of having to taper off their densities, FAR&#039;s and uses to satisfy concerns of locals and local pols. I agree with nearly everything above, but I would like to hear that side of the story. It&#039;s sunk more than one new urbanist development along the way, even as the developer was trying to do the &quot;right&quot; thing. I might be off base but i seem to remember that having something to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should think about giving a short interview to the Forest City people and see what they say about it. I seem to remember it being another case of having to taper off their densities, FAR's and uses to satisfy concerns of locals and local pols. I agree with nearly everything above, but I would like to hear that side of the story. It's sunk more than one new urbanist development along the way, even as the developer was trying to do the "right" thing. I might be off base but i seem to remember that having something to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSD</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70025</link>
		<dc:creator>JSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70025</guid>
		<description>As for cookie cutter, I meant mass produced and likely made of cheap materials, not that they all looked the same. It&#039;s common to see subdivisions made up of many different styles of homes, all of which are made of plywood and drywall. It&#039;s also equally common to see a line of brownstones that look identical, but are sturdily built and have lasted for generations, as you&#039;ve pointed out. 

I think the mistake that many of these communities make is their selective focus on what it is they happen to like about New Urbanism. Applying New Urbanist principles (or in Stapleton&#039;s case, the gist of New Urbanist principles) to a small town or random New Jersey suburb doesn&#039;t make all that much sense. Suburbs and small towns are completely different animals when compared with great cities, and should be treated as such. Of course, improvements can and should be made, both in existing areas and new towns. But dropping a park in front of a line of residences, and watching a young mother play with her kid, isn&#039;t New Urbanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for cookie cutter, I meant mass produced and likely made of cheap materials, not that they all looked the same. It's common to see subdivisions made up of many different styles of homes, all of which are made of plywood and drywall. It's also equally common to see a line of brownstones that look identical, but are sturdily built and have lasted for generations, as you've pointed out. </p>
<p>I think the mistake that many of these communities make is their selective focus on what it is they happen to like about New Urbanism. Applying New Urbanist principles (or in Stapleton's case, the gist of New Urbanist principles) to a small town or random New Jersey suburb doesn't make all that much sense. Suburbs and small towns are completely different animals when compared with great cities, and should be treated as such. Of course, improvements can and should be made, both in existing areas and new towns. But dropping a park in front of a line of residences, and watching a young mother play with her kid, isn't New Urbanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70024</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70024</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s not an incremental step towards anything. The model for new urban developments are the cities and towns people have been building for thousands of years.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well said!

Everyone noticed that Stapleton has been brought to us by the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_City_Enterprises&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Forest City Enterprises&lt;/a&gt; that&#039;s responsible for Atlantic Yards, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It's not an incremental step towards anything. The model for new urban developments are the cities and towns people have been building for thousands of years.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well said!</p>
<p>Everyone noticed that Stapleton has been brought to us by the same <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_City_Enterprises" rel="nofollow">Forest City Enterprises</a> that's responsible for Atlantic Yards, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70021</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70021</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Stapleton folks objected to having bus stops on their street. Presto, bus line moved to uninhabited street.&lt;blockquote&gt;
That tells me everything I need to know about Stapleton.  If it were a successful New Urbanist development the residents would be asking for more bus service, not less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Stapleton folks objected to having bus stops on their street. Presto, bus line moved to uninhabited street.<br />
<blockquote>
That tells me everything I need to know about Stapleton.  If it were a successful New Urbanist development the residents would be asking for more bus service, not less.</blockquote></p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denverite</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70020</link>
		<dc:creator>Denverite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70020</guid>
		<description>Paz you raise a another problem with Stapleton. It&#039;s not an incremental step towards anything. The model for new urban developments are the cities and towns people have been building for thousands of years. They are based on people being able to walk to shop or socialize or eat out or even to work. They are also based on the mixing of people of all walks of life. The problem for American urbanists is that walkable, mixing, cities like San Francisco, New York or Boston are so successful they are unaffordable for all but the few. Another problem is that fantastic, walkable downtowns in small cities and towns all over the country are being shuttered because of a host of economic and social factors related to local taxes, social services, poverty, race, schools, sprawl, subsidizing home ownership, destruction of local retail etc. Only affluent small cities, mostly college towns, have maintained their walkable character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paz you raise a another problem with Stapleton. It's not an incremental step towards anything. The model for new urban developments are the cities and towns people have been building for thousands of years. They are based on people being able to walk to shop or socialize or eat out or even to work. They are also based on the mixing of people of all walks of life. The problem for American urbanists is that walkable, mixing, cities like San Francisco, New York or Boston are so successful they are unaffordable for all but the few. Another problem is that fantastic, walkable downtowns in small cities and towns all over the country are being shuttered because of a host of economic and social factors related to local taxes, social services, poverty, race, schools, sprawl, subsidizing home ownership, destruction of local retail etc. Only affluent small cities, mostly college towns, have maintained their walkable character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/12/new-urbanism-old-urbanism-and-creative-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-70017</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6401#comment-70017</guid>
		<description>Why is &quot;cookie-cutter&quot; housing understood to be a &quot;bad&quot; thing? I thought we were fighting for density and multiple uses in close proximity. I live on a Brooklyn street lined with &quot;cookie-cutter&quot; flats and I think they look great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is "cookie-cutter" housing understood to be a "bad" thing? I thought we were fighting for density and multiple uses in close proximity. I live on a Brooklyn street lined with "cookie-cutter" flats and I think they look great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
