<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revised Kent Ave Plan Extends Bike Route to Flushing Ave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-69782</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-69782</guid>
		<description>I went to the CB1 meeting last night. Vincent Abate confirmed that it is &quot;a done deal&quot;.
I think a class action lawsuit against the city, the DOT, and our own community board 1 , would be a good place to start. Why wait for the first fatality from this dangerous plan?
These streets won&#039;t hold a stopped fully loaded 18 wheeler because McCarren Park IS a swamp barely under the surface. The big condos that went up hit the water table at 15 feet. I see disaster on the near horizon , if the plan comes to be. Bloomberg can only see his myopic &quot;legacy&#039; in completing greenways and bike paths and not the safety of residents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to the CB1 meeting last night. Vincent Abate confirmed that it is &#8220;a done deal&#8221;.<br />
I think a class action lawsuit against the city, the DOT, and our own community board 1 , would be a good place to start. Why wait for the first fatality from this dangerous plan?<br />
These streets won&#8217;t hold a stopped fully loaded 18 wheeler because McCarren Park IS a swamp barely under the surface. The big condos that went up hit the water table at 15 feet. I see disaster on the near horizon , if the plan comes to be. Bloomberg can only see his myopic &#8220;legacy&#8217; in completing greenways and bike paths and not the safety of residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-69322</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-69322</guid>
		<description>Here is a map to see the proposed route on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a map to see the proposed route on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-69320</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-69320</guid>
		<description>If you lived on N 11th or N 14th street in 11211 , you would be really pissed off. If you wanted to move a truck of material , bread, produce, livestock, art, etc from Greenpoint, you would be pretty mad to drive a mile and a half out of the way to get to south side Williamsburg , Navy Yard, BQE ...  It is a danger to a steady flow of McCarren Park goers (children,pets,bicyclists, teams of soccer players) Most distracted by the park, and already in a crazily under-marked set of converging thoroughfares. Motorcyclists,truck and cars are driving like demons to get to and thru the park. If you drive, you know how the right turn onto N 11th street off of Roebling st comes up on you fast. Imagine a truck or two that is waiting to turn onto Union avenue. Even with stoplights, the trucks will have to cross over 5 avenues , the biggest being Bedford avenue.
I think the plan sucks. I think the trucks should parallel the route down Wythe avenue , or stay how it is, untill a different plan is come up with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you lived on N 11th or N 14th street in 11211 , you would be really pissed off. If you wanted to move a truck of material , bread, produce, livestock, art, etc from Greenpoint, you would be pretty mad to drive a mile and a half out of the way to get to south side Williamsburg , Navy Yard, BQE &#8230;  It is a danger to a steady flow of McCarren Park goers (children,pets,bicyclists, teams of soccer players) Most distracted by the park, and already in a crazily under-marked set of converging thoroughfares. Motorcyclists,truck and cars are driving like demons to get to and thru the park. If you drive, you know how the right turn onto N 11th street off of Roebling st comes up on you fast. Imagine a truck or two that is waiting to turn onto Union avenue. Even with stoplights, the trucks will have to cross over 5 avenues , the biggest being Bedford avenue.<br />
I think the plan sucks. I think the trucks should parallel the route down Wythe avenue , or stay how it is, untill a different plan is come up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-69000</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-69000</guid>
		<description>that looks like a pretty darn safe installation to me, i dont know the area and i don&#039;t know its effects in terms of noise re-distribution or what not but increasing safety and accessibility for cyclists can only mean good things</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that looks like a pretty darn safe installation to me, i dont know the area and i don&#8217;t know its effects in terms of noise re-distribution or what not but increasing safety and accessibility for cyclists can only mean good things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Hymen</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-68993</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Hymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 18:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-68993</guid>
		<description>More than that, Marty.  &quot;NIMBY&#039;s complain about small, Class II bike lane. DOT comes back with an extended Class I bike lane as the solution...&quot; and plans to route trucks all over the more residential portions of the neighborhood, not to mention the probable off-route truck traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than that, Marty.  &#8220;NIMBY&#8217;s complain about small, Class II bike lane. DOT comes back with an extended Class I bike lane as the solution&#8230;&#8221; and plans to route trucks all over the more residential portions of the neighborhood, not to mention the probable off-route truck traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Barfowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-68964</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Barfowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-68964</guid>
		<description>Gotta love it. Irrational NIMBY&#039;s complain about small, Class II bike lane. DOT comes back with an extended Class I bike lane as the solution. Take that, NIMBY&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love it. Irrational NIMBY&#8217;s complain about small, Class II bike lane. DOT comes back with an extended Class I bike lane as the solution. Take that, NIMBY&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Uptown</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-68960</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Uptown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-68960</guid>
		<description>Trucks are routed over to Union Ave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trucks are routed over to Union Ave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SBound</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/revised-kent-ave-plan-extends-bike-route-to-flushing-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-68958</link>
		<dc:creator>SBound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6273#comment-68958</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the new South bound pair for displaced Kent traffic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the new South bound pair for displaced Kent traffic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

