<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Room for People Rather Than Cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/making-room-for-people-rather-than-cars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/making-room-for-people-rather-than-cars/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/making-room-for-people-rather-than-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-68918</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6268#comment-68918</guid>
		<description>Oh, one more point. When I called the developer after the plywood came down and the parking solution was revealed (the building looks pretty good above the ground floor) his response was &quot;what&#039;s the big deal, it&#039;s Brooklyn.&quot;  Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, one more point. When I called the developer after the plywood came down and the parking solution was revealed (the building looks pretty good above the ground floor) his response was &#8220;what&#8217;s the big deal, it&#8217;s Brooklyn.&#8221;  Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/making-room-for-people-rather-than-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-68917</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6268#comment-68917</guid>
		<description>Way back in the 1980s, New York City&#039;s zoning banned front yard parking in most zones, although enforcement is far from universal.  This is something the local communities (if not all individual property owners) wanted.

Parking must (theoretically) be either in the &quot;side lot ribbon,&quot; a driveway long the side lot line, within the building, or in the rear yard.

In many zones the front yard rules were modified to bring buildings closer to the street, eliminating the possibility of a parking pad in the front yard.  (Some folks just park partially in the yard, and partially on the sidewalk, however).  

And a limitation was put in place on the amount of total curb cuts, in some cases with a minimum of 34 feet required between them, to preserve on-street parking for the neighborhood.  New buildings on small lots continued to allowed to waive parking altogether.

The largest building constructed in my neighborhood since the new rules, however, simply ignored them, filing one set to building plans and building something else.  When I reported it, they probably just went to the BSA, told the &quot;seven lies&quot; as the seven findings for a variance are called in the land use law trade, and got legalized.  It is on 17th Street between 10th and 11th Avenues in Brooklyn.

It would make a photo opposite to this one.  In theory 34 feet between curb cuts is required, and no front yard parking is permitted.  The zoning also required that the new building line up with those on either side, but it doesn&#039;t, because that would have left no room for front yard parking.

The legal parking would have been a common space in the basement, something the sloping street facilitated, and was actually done in new buildings in more affluent Park Slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back in the 1980s, New York City&#8217;s zoning banned front yard parking in most zones, although enforcement is far from universal.  This is something the local communities (if not all individual property owners) wanted.</p>
<p>Parking must (theoretically) be either in the &#8220;side lot ribbon,&#8221; a driveway long the side lot line, within the building, or in the rear yard.</p>
<p>In many zones the front yard rules were modified to bring buildings closer to the street, eliminating the possibility of a parking pad in the front yard.  (Some folks just park partially in the yard, and partially on the sidewalk, however).  </p>
<p>And a limitation was put in place on the amount of total curb cuts, in some cases with a minimum of 34 feet required between them, to preserve on-street parking for the neighborhood.  New buildings on small lots continued to allowed to waive parking altogether.</p>
<p>The largest building constructed in my neighborhood since the new rules, however, simply ignored them, filing one set to building plans and building something else.  When I reported it, they probably just went to the BSA, told the &#8220;seven lies&#8221; as the seven findings for a variance are called in the land use law trade, and got legalized.  It is on 17th Street between 10th and 11th Avenues in Brooklyn.</p>
<p>It would make a photo opposite to this one.  In theory 34 feet between curb cuts is required, and no front yard parking is permitted.  The zoning also required that the new building line up with those on either side, but it doesn&#8217;t, because that would have left no room for front yard parking.</p>
<p>The legal parking would have been a common space in the basement, something the sloping street facilitated, and was actually done in new buildings in more affluent Park Slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anabel Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/29/making-room-for-people-rather-than-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-68915</link>
		<dc:creator>Anabel Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6268#comment-68915</guid>
		<description>Brickell has changed by leaps and bounds in the last few years.  Its nice to see that not only developers and government are taking action to make more walkable streets -- but small property owners are also converting their properties as well.  Sounds like a move in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brickell has changed by leaps and bounds in the last few years.  Its nice to see that not only developers and government are taking action to make more walkable streets &#8212; but small property owners are also converting their properties as well.  Sounds like a move in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

