<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will: Government Shouldn&#8217;t Interfere &#8212; Except to Benefit Big Highways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAS</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68214</link>
		<dc:creator>TAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68214</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a candid and cogent interrogation of Will&#039;s predictably kneejerk complaint. To be fair, he used to seem more intellectually honest and could have been a voice of reason for conservatives. The earlier George Will would have recognized Secretary LaHood&#039;s advocacy of increased transportation choices as a policy consistent with conservatism&#039;s faith in an honest marketplace. Now, all we get is a rant.

But that&#039;s getting to be old news. What&#039;s new is that Streetsblog has a witty new voice in Ms. Schor. In addition to a surprising Secretary LaHood, that&#039;s something else to cheer about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a candid and cogent interrogation of Will&#8217;s predictably kneejerk complaint. To be fair, he used to seem more intellectually honest and could have been a voice of reason for conservatives. The earlier George Will would have recognized Secretary LaHood&#8217;s advocacy of increased transportation choices as a policy consistent with conservatism&#8217;s faith in an honest marketplace. Now, all we get is a rant.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s getting to be old news. What&#8217;s new is that Streetsblog has a witty new voice in Ms. Schor. In addition to a surprising Secretary LaHood, that&#8217;s something else to cheer about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68199</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68199</guid>
		<description>Come to think of it, Johnson spent a lot of money on war and seniors, too. Hm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to think of it, Johnson spent a lot of money on war and seniors, too. Hm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68189</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68189</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why does anyone even pay attention to this clown?&lt;/i&gt;

Because he&#039;s well-respected in conservative circles. We mustn&#039;t forget that his opinion in this matter is probably shared by a great majority of Americans too--conservative AND liberal.

PS. There&#039;s much to complain about in the &quot;Great Society&quot;, but comparing Hood&#039;s transportation policies to that era of generous spending is dishonest at best. George Bush 2 spent more money than Johnson--not that Will necessarily agreed with it, but at least he spent it on things that conservatives generally approve of (wars, and handouts to the elderly).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why does anyone even pay attention to this clown?</i></p>
<p>Because he&#8217;s well-respected in conservative circles. We mustn&#8217;t forget that his opinion in this matter is probably shared by a great majority of Americans too&#8211;conservative AND liberal.</p>
<p>PS. There&#8217;s much to complain about in the &#8220;Great Society&#8221;, but comparing Hood&#8217;s transportation policies to that era of generous spending is dishonest at best. George Bush 2 spent more money than Johnson&#8211;not that Will necessarily agreed with it, but at least he spent it on things that conservatives generally approve of (wars, and handouts to the elderly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David_K</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68179</link>
		<dc:creator>David_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68179</guid>
		<description>Ditto what Erik Schwartz said.  Will is intellectually dishonest.  He writes:

&quot;And long before climate change became another excuse for disparaging America&#039;s &#039;automobile culture,&#039; many liberal intellectuals were bothered by the automobile. It subverted their agenda of expanding government—meaning their—supervision of other people&#039;s lives. Drivers moving around where and when they please? Without government supervision? Depriving themselves and others of communitarian moments on mass transit? No good could come of this.&quot;

Drivers could never move around &quot;where and when they please&quot; without a massive investment in Big Government, shaping the very identity of Americans for generations (as people who drive to work, drive to shop, drive to recreate).  &quot;Once upon a time,&quot; Will says, &quot;government was supposed to defend the shores, deliver the mail and let people get on with their lives.&quot;  Well (if ever the case), that went out the window with the construction of the interstate system, all of which has altered our landscape and re-shaped our culture in shocking ways.  As a small example, take Interstate 88, which runs from Albany to Binghamton.  My grandma and grandpa used to live at 330 Main Street in Oneonta, NY until the government siezed their property through eminent domain to make way for an &quot;arterial&quot; road leading from the highway.  I-88 destroyed the character of a beautiful small town, and the property siezure probably killed my grandfather (he died a year after his house was possessed, in 1972).  And what do we get out of it?  The freedom to go, whenever we please, between Albany and Binghamton on four wheels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto what Erik Schwartz said.  Will is intellectually dishonest.  He writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;And long before climate change became another excuse for disparaging America&#8217;s &#8216;automobile culture,&#8217; many liberal intellectuals were bothered by the automobile. It subverted their agenda of expanding government—meaning their—supervision of other people&#8217;s lives. Drivers moving around where and when they please? Without government supervision? Depriving themselves and others of communitarian moments on mass transit? No good could come of this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Drivers could never move around &#8220;where and when they please&#8221; without a massive investment in Big Government, shaping the very identity of Americans for generations (as people who drive to work, drive to shop, drive to recreate).  &#8220;Once upon a time,&#8221; Will says, &#8220;government was supposed to defend the shores, deliver the mail and let people get on with their lives.&#8221;  Well (if ever the case), that went out the window with the construction of the interstate system, all of which has altered our landscape and re-shaped our culture in shocking ways.  As a small example, take Interstate 88, which runs from Albany to Binghamton.  My grandma and grandpa used to live at 330 Main Street in Oneonta, NY until the government siezed their property through eminent domain to make way for an &#8220;arterial&#8221; road leading from the highway.  I-88 destroyed the character of a beautiful small town, and the property siezure probably killed my grandfather (he died a year after his house was possessed, in 1972).  And what do we get out of it?  The freedom to go, whenever we please, between Albany and Binghamton on four wheels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68172</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68172</guid>
		<description>This article is an anti-intellectual shame. Any honest view of our transportation policy reveals shocking government intervention in every aspect of our widespread (and virtually mandated) automobile culture. Parking and highway lobbies, wildly suppressed gasoline prices, and endless wars to maintain these prices are among the deepest and most corrupting influences in our government at every level. Yet the mere mention of cycling - incredibly efficient personal transportation that sheds this baggage - gets panned without a mention of the mountain of upside personal and collective freedoms inherent to simply _facilitating_ cycling in our metropolitan regions (where there is tremendous potential to do so).

Ray LaHood is not talking about taking away anyone&#039;s cars. He&#039;s talking about rolling back the mandate that you drive two miles down the road to buy a bagel. Some may drive, some may bike, some may take the bus. That&#039;s freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is an anti-intellectual shame. Any honest view of our transportation policy reveals shocking government intervention in every aspect of our widespread (and virtually mandated) automobile culture. Parking and highway lobbies, wildly suppressed gasoline prices, and endless wars to maintain these prices are among the deepest and most corrupting influences in our government at every level. Yet the mere mention of cycling &#8211; incredibly efficient personal transportation that sheds this baggage &#8211; gets panned without a mention of the mountain of upside personal and collective freedoms inherent to simply _facilitating_ cycling in our metropolitan regions (where there is tremendous potential to do so).</p>
<p>Ray LaHood is not talking about taking away anyone&#8217;s cars. He&#8217;s talking about rolling back the mandate that you drive two miles down the road to buy a bagel. Some may drive, some may bike, some may take the bus. That&#8217;s freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Siegel</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68170</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68170</guid>
		<description>&quot;It seems that Will would rather complain about Lyndon Johnson&#039;s 45-year-old Great Society, which brought us Medicare and Medicaid&quot;

But note that the Great Society also provided vast amounts of money for freeways, suburbs, and urban renewal projects that tore down existing neighborhoods and replaced them with tower-in-a-park projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems that Will would rather complain about Lyndon Johnson&#8217;s 45-year-old Great Society, which brought us Medicare and Medicaid&#8221;</p>
<p>But note that the Great Society also provided vast amounts of money for freeways, suburbs, and urban renewal projects that tore down existing neighborhoods and replaced them with tower-in-a-park projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence Eckerson Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68168</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence Eckerson Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68168</guid>
		<description>George Will ignores that some big metropolises are undergoing an alchemy into people-friendly places where the denizens of Gotham are clamoring for options that are not committing ecological genocide to future generations. Velocipide use is soaring.  More Americans are foregoing their Hummers and jalopies in favor of mass people-movers. The hoi polloi are rejecting status quo when it comes to current transportation policies&#039; side effects: they favor options that preserve pristine air, heal our long-maligned thoroughfares by making them more balanced to myriad uses, and sponsor more robust communities.

See anyone can write bombast as good as Georgie Willy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Will ignores that some big metropolises are undergoing an alchemy into people-friendly places where the denizens of Gotham are clamoring for options that are not committing ecological genocide to future generations. Velocipide use is soaring.  More Americans are foregoing their Hummers and jalopies in favor of mass people-movers. The hoi polloi are rejecting status quo when it comes to current transportation policies&#8217; side effects: they favor options that preserve pristine air, heal our long-maligned thoroughfares by making them more balanced to myriad uses, and sponsor more robust communities.</p>
<p>See anyone can write bombast as good as Georgie Willy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey W. Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68167</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey W. Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68167</guid>
		<description>Why does anyone even pay attention to this clown?  He&#039;s a climate change denier, his weekly appearances on This Week Without David Brinkley are an ongoing embarrassment, and even his books about baseball are dull.  Will writing on transit is certainly worth ignoring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does anyone even pay attention to this clown?  He&#8217;s a climate change denier, his weekly appearances on This Week Without David Brinkley are an ongoing embarrassment, and even his books about baseball are dull.  Will writing on transit is certainly worth ignoring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68166</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68166</guid>
		<description>Urban cores have been largely destroyed in what were once great cities (Cleveland, Detroit, St Louis, Pittsburgh, etc.) by allowing the federal government to subsidize sprawl.  Other newer cities like Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Phoenix, LA grew via highways.


Post-WW2 mentality (leading to the highway building boom) was motivated considerably by the strategic concerns engendered by nuclear weapons and hence the original name for the project, “the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.” Will probably believes that we feel safer knowing that we can escape nuclear destruction via four wheels.  &quot;Bush kept us safe and highways do too&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urban cores have been largely destroyed in what were once great cities (Cleveland, Detroit, St Louis, Pittsburgh, etc.) by allowing the federal government to subsidize sprawl.  Other newer cities like Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Phoenix, LA grew via highways.</p>
<p>Post-WW2 mentality (leading to the highway building boom) was motivated considerably by the strategic concerns engendered by nuclear weapons and hence the original name for the project, “the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.” Will probably believes that we feel safer knowing that we can escape nuclear destruction via four wheels.  &#8220;Bush kept us safe and highways do too&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/18/george-will-government-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-68163</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6180#comment-68163</guid>
		<description>&quot;He willfully ignores the fact that the highway industry benefits from unprecedented government intervention and an uneven playing field that discourages transit projects while subsidizing roads.&quot;

It&#039;s amazing what people are willing to willfully ignore when the money is coming their way.  Which is why we are facing an institutional collapse.  And it is only the second worst scenario out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He willfully ignores the fact that the highway industry benefits from unprecedented government intervention and an uneven playing field that discourages transit projects while subsidizing roads.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing what people are willing to willfully ignore when the money is coming their way.  Which is why we are facing an institutional collapse.  And it is only the second worst scenario out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

