<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transportation for America Releases Blueprint for Transportation Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/11/transportation-for-america-releases-blueprint-for-transportation-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/11/transportation-for-america-releases-blueprint-for-transportation-reform/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/11/transportation-for-america-releases-blueprint-for-transportation-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-67744</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6111#comment-67744</guid>
		<description>I agree with the objectives, but disagree with how they may be achieved.

Federal &quot;principles&quot; will not solve the problem.  A look at the relative priorities of federal, federal via state, state, and local initiatives over the past decade shows what might work -- local transportation funding with local resources?

But where would those local resources come from?  A national health care financing system, which would eliminate the massive and potentially devastating local government cost of health care for retirees and (in some cases) the uninsured.  New York City and its counties would also benefit from getting rid of the local share of Medicaid.  

These savings would exceed any federal infrastructure spending that is likely to occur.  And each level of government would be taking sole responsibility for its sphere, ending the dispersed accountability we have now.

I absolutely don&#039;t want my transporation $ going through DC.  I probably don&#039;t want them going through Albany, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the objectives, but disagree with how they may be achieved.</p>
<p>Federal &#8220;principles&#8221; will not solve the problem.  A look at the relative priorities of federal, federal via state, state, and local initiatives over the past decade shows what might work &#8212; local transportation funding with local resources?</p>
<p>But where would those local resources come from?  A national health care financing system, which would eliminate the massive and potentially devastating local government cost of health care for retirees and (in some cases) the uninsured.  New York City and its counties would also benefit from getting rid of the local share of Medicaid.  </p>
<p>These savings would exceed any federal infrastructure spending that is likely to occur.  And each level of government would be taking sole responsibility for its sphere, ending the dispersed accountability we have now.</p>
<p>I absolutely don&#8217;t want my transporation $ going through DC.  I probably don&#8217;t want them going through Albany, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

