<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victory for Hell&#8217;s Kitchen: Lawsuit Limits New Parking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/08/victory-for-hells-kitchen-lawsuit-limits-new-parking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/08/victory-for-hells-kitchen-lawsuit-limits-new-parking/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:49:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/08/victory-for-hells-kitchen-lawsuit-limits-new-parking/comment-page-1/#comment-67673</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6101#comment-67673</guid>
		<description>The lawsuit, and the City&#039;s Clean Air Act commitment, only concerned off-street spaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawsuit, and the City's Clean Air Act commitment, only concerned off-street spaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/08/victory-for-hells-kitchen-lawsuit-limits-new-parking/comment-page-1/#comment-67672</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6101#comment-67672</guid>
		<description>Anyone know if the law could have permitted a swap to be negotiated - that is, require the development to put the 950 parking spaces underground, but then eliminate the equivalent number of spaces on the street by converting them to a bike lane or expanded sidewalk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know if the law could have permitted a swap to be negotiated - that is, require the development to put the 950 parking spaces underground, but then eliminate the equivalent number of spaces on the street by converting them to a bike lane or expanded sidewalk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
