<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Twist in Kent Ave Saga: Safer Bike Path Plus Parking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/04/new-twist-in-kent-ave-saga-safer-bike-path-plus-parking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/04/new-twist-in-kent-ave-saga-safer-bike-path-plus-parking/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:12:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David_K</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/04/new-twist-in-kent-ave-saga-safer-bike-path-plus-parking/comment-page-1/#comment-67422</link>
		<dc:creator>David_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6064#comment-67422</guid>
		<description>Mike - that&#039;s fantastic news, thanks.  This is going to be a really welcome change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - that's fantastic news, thanks.  This is going to be a really welcome change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Epstein</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/04/new-twist-in-kent-ave-saga-safer-bike-path-plus-parking/comment-page-1/#comment-67420</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Epstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6064#comment-67420</guid>
		<description>David_K, the design would be like the Prospect Park West path, with a two-way bike path, then a buffer, then parking, then moving traffic, then more parking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David_K, the design would be like the Prospect Park West path, with a two-way bike path, then a buffer, then parking, then moving traffic, then more parking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David_K</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/04/new-twist-in-kent-ave-saga-safer-bike-path-plus-parking/comment-page-1/#comment-67415</link>
		<dc:creator>David_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6064#comment-67415</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if I understand -- with cars park outside of the new bike path (I hope so), or will the bike lane just be painted green?  I&#039;m all for a one-way Kent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not sure if I understand -- with cars park outside of the new bike path (I hope so), or will the bike lane just be painted green?  I'm all for a one-way Kent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/05/04/new-twist-in-kent-ave-saga-safer-bike-path-plus-parking/comment-page-1/#comment-67405</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=6064#comment-67405</guid>
		<description>Kent Avenue is such a great ride.  Can&#039;t wait to see what this will look like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent Avenue is such a great ride.  Can't wait to see what this will look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
