<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Obama Administration Poised to Push Transit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/24/is-the-obama-administration-poised-to-push-transit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/24/is-the-obama-administration-poised-to-push-transit/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:19:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Overhead Wire</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/24/is-the-obama-administration-poised-to-push-transit/comment-page-1/#comment-66931</link>
		<dc:creator>The Overhead Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5971#comment-66931</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll believe it when I see it.  Rhywun is right, they don&#039;t get the links between all of their policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll believe it when I see it.  Rhywun is right, they don't get the links between all of their policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/24/is-the-obama-administration-poised-to-push-transit/comment-page-1/#comment-66929</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5971#comment-66929</guid>
		<description>RE: Cash for clunkers

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Proponents say the program ... is desperately needed to lift slumping car sales.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

In other words, it&#039;s a jobs bill. And a recklessly irresponsible one at that. One has to wonder whether this administration&#039;s left hand knows what the right hand is talking about, there are so many mixed signals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Cash for clunkers</p>
<p><i>"Proponents say the program ... is desperately needed to lift slumping car sales."</i></p>
<p>In other words, it's a jobs bill. And a recklessly irresponsible one at that. One has to wonder whether this administration's left hand knows what the right hand is talking about, there are so many mixed signals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/24/is-the-obama-administration-poised-to-push-transit/comment-page-1/#comment-66928</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5971#comment-66928</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid much of the future money has already been absorbed by the past, including the auto industry bailout and now (the WSJ says it is getting closer) cash for clunkers.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124050774521848777.html

Just think how much money has already gone to subsidize excess outsized energy gushing houses and SUVs, both through the mortgage interest deductions (many of the SUVs were bought with HELOCs) and bailouts of defaults.  The reality is going to be horrific financial constraints going forward -- over and above what was inevitable due to unfunded senior benefits.

Now the question is whether all this money showered on the auto industry is easing a transition or preventing it.  

It would nice if as part of this cash for clunkers bill a few nickels were included to fund the start up costs of NY&#039;s bike share.  At least enough to offset a few months of the interest New Yorkers who didn&#039;t buy SUVs will have to pay for the rest of their lives on the related federal debt.

And it would be nice to have some loan and purchase guarantees to subsidize the production of commuter bike inventory and related accessories (locks, helmets, safety vests), as well as new cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm afraid much of the future money has already been absorbed by the past, including the auto industry bailout and now (the WSJ says it is getting closer) cash for clunkers.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124050774521848777.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124050774521848777.html</a></p>
<p>Just think how much money has already gone to subsidize excess outsized energy gushing houses and SUVs, both through the mortgage interest deductions (many of the SUVs were bought with HELOCs) and bailouts of defaults.  The reality is going to be horrific financial constraints going forward -- over and above what was inevitable due to unfunded senior benefits.</p>
<p>Now the question is whether all this money showered on the auto industry is easing a transition or preventing it.  </p>
<p>It would nice if as part of this cash for clunkers bill a few nickels were included to fund the start up costs of NY's bike share.  At least enough to offset a few months of the interest New Yorkers who didn't buy SUVs will have to pay for the rest of their lives on the related federal debt.</p>
<p>And it would be nice to have some loan and purchase guarantees to subsidize the production of commuter bike inventory and related accessories (locks, helmets, safety vests), as well as new cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/24/is-the-obama-administration-poised-to-push-transit/comment-page-1/#comment-66924</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5971#comment-66924</guid>
		<description>Ray LaHood&#039;s cyclist pledge is potentially good evidence as it provides a suitable way to focus on accountability.  

He should be held accountable for his words which are part of the public record and indicates the technological trajectory he wants to at least, explore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray LaHood's cyclist pledge is potentially good evidence as it provides a suitable way to focus on accountability.  </p>
<p>He should be held accountable for his words which are part of the public record and indicates the technological trajectory he wants to at least, explore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
