<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiki Wednesday: Community Boards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/08/wiki-wednesday-community-boards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/08/wiki-wednesday-community-boards/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/08/wiki-wednesday-community-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-66308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5852#comment-66308</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this posting.  
As a relative newcomer to NYC (6 years), I never understand the community boards.  The structure seems redundant with the city council districts. 

I come from Chicago, which of course has it own legendary problem. But there the land use issues are done basically by approval of the city council representative, the Alderman/woman.  It is not a law but an unwritten agreement in a one party town. 

It some ways this works, because at least you get to elect the Alderman/women directly.  

Does anyone know why this ULURP process is not done at the council level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this posting.<br />
As a relative newcomer to NYC (6 years), I never understand the community boards.  The structure seems redundant with the city council districts. </p>
<p>I come from Chicago, which of course has it own legendary problem. But there the land use issues are done basically by approval of the city council representative, the Alderman/woman.  It is not a law but an unwritten agreement in a one party town. </p>
<p>It some ways this works, because at least you get to elect the Alderman/women directly.  </p>
<p>Does anyone know why this ULURP process is not done at the council level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/08/wiki-wednesday-community-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-66183</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5852#comment-66183</guid>
		<description>The CB 13 in Brooklyn is a farce. All they are rubber stamps for  Councilmen Domenic &quot; Southampton &quot; Recchia and Mike &quot; Pay to Play&quot; Nelson. Between the both of them they ruined the quality of life for the residents of Coney Island &amp; Brighton Beach. Both of them together with the BP purge the CB members that go against the grain or their policies. It&#039;s as corrupt as the City Council .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CB 13 in Brooklyn is a farce. All they are rubber stamps for  Councilmen Domenic &#8221; Southampton &#8221; Recchia and Mike &#8221; Pay to Play&#8221; Nelson. Between the both of them they ruined the quality of life for the residents of Coney Island &amp; Brighton Beach. Both of them together with the BP purge the CB members that go against the grain or their policies. It&#8217;s as corrupt as the City Council .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumi</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/08/wiki-wednesday-community-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-66179</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5852#comment-66179</guid>
		<description>The wiki article doesn&#039;t make the distinction that the Bronx CB&#039;s vote in the Yankee&#039;s Stadium proposal was part of Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP), while Brooklyn CB6&#039;s vote was a purely symbolic declaration that accompanied the organization&#039;s comments submitted for the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). 

CB6 had no standing or skin in this fight and was merely lending the board&#039;s expertise and passion for planning issues on behalf of the community.  Therefore Brooklyn CB6&#039;s vote would only have been a small footnote in the history of the Atlantic Yards fight, if not for Markowitz&#039;s dramatic action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wiki article doesn&#8217;t make the distinction that the Bronx CB&#8217;s vote in the Yankee&#8217;s Stadium proposal was part of Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP), while Brooklyn CB6&#8242;s vote was a purely symbolic declaration that accompanied the organization&#8217;s comments submitted for the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). </p>
<p>CB6 had no standing or skin in this fight and was merely lending the board&#8217;s expertise and passion for planning issues on behalf of the community.  Therefore Brooklyn CB6&#8242;s vote would only have been a small footnote in the history of the Atlantic Yards fight, if not for Markowitz&#8217;s dramatic action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/04/08/wiki-wednesday-community-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-66167</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5852#comment-66167</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;My very clear expectation is that these appointees are there to carry out a vision for the borough president&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

His &quot;very clear expectation&quot; is very clearly wrong. Well thankfully he&#039;s moving on up to DC; maybe he&#039;ll find a different circle of yes-men there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;My very clear expectation is that these appointees are there to carry out a vision for the borough president&#8221;</i></p>
<p>His &#8220;very clear expectation&#8221; is very clearly wrong. Well thankfully he&#8217;s moving on up to DC; maybe he&#8217;ll find a different circle of yes-men there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

