<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jass</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/comment-page-1/#comment-64911</link>
		<dc:creator>jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5704#comment-64911</guid>
		<description>The curb cut thing hurts me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curb cut thing hurts me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/comment-page-1/#comment-64857</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5704#comment-64857</guid>
		<description>&gt; City Gives Drivers Permission to Block Pedestrian Curb Cuts in Bay Ridge

&quot;T&quot; intersections in Bay Ridge means Shore Road, which is already designed to expressway speeds and has very few crossings for people to get to the many attractions along the shore like the Zen gardens, the baseball fields and the pier.

I asked on that thread why there are curb cuts with no crosswalks--it&#039;s obvious the city meant for people to cross there whether they bothered to paint crosswalks or not, so for this idiot to swoop in and score points with drivers is the height of hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; City Gives Drivers Permission to Block Pedestrian Curb Cuts in Bay Ridge</p>
<p>&#8220;T&#8221; intersections in Bay Ridge means Shore Road, which is already designed to expressway speeds and has very few crossings for people to get to the many attractions along the shore like the Zen gardens, the baseball fields and the pier.</p>
<p>I asked on that thread why there are curb cuts with no crosswalks&#8211;it&#8217;s obvious the city meant for people to cross there whether they bothered to paint crosswalks or not, so for this idiot to swoop in and score points with drivers is the height of hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/comment-page-1/#comment-64854</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5704#comment-64854</guid>
		<description>Sounds like something for the TA legal squad...calling Peter AuH2O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like something for the TA legal squad&#8230;calling Peter AuH2O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Mork</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/comment-page-1/#comment-64850</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Mork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5704#comment-64850</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the definition of &quot;crosswalk&quot; from the NYS traffic law:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
[paragraph] 110. Crosswalk. (a) That part of a roadway at an intersection
included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on
opposite sides of the highway between the curbs or, in the absence of
curbs, between the edges of the traversable roadway.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In other words, a crosswalk exists, whether there is paint or not, wherever there are sidewalks that connect on either side of a road.

So, saying that you can park in a crosswalk because there is no paint there is probably illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the definition of &#8220;crosswalk&#8221; from the NYS traffic law:</p>
<blockquote><p>
[paragraph] 110. Crosswalk. (a) That part of a roadway at an intersection<br />
included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on<br />
opposite sides of the highway between the curbs or, in the absence of<br />
curbs, between the edges of the traversable roadway.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, a crosswalk exists, whether there is paint or not, wherever there are sidewalks that connect on either side of a road.</p>
<p>So, saying that you can park in a crosswalk because there is no paint there is probably illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/comment-page-1/#comment-64849</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5704#comment-64849</guid>
		<description>Blocking curb cuts (Bayridge article) is simply an affront to all anyone who is disabled, especially those in wheelchairs, a parent with a stroller or just someone using a shopping cart (ok, granny cart) to bring home some groceries. 

It&#039;s also leaving fewer options for dropping off people from cars or taxis

Having to walk long distance around obstacles like blocked streets kills pedestrian traffic. Any businesses, schools, senior centers, medical offices, and local residents should be opposed to these measures. It will make these streets even more dangerous, less neighborly and less inviting to those who need to most help in getting around. All so another 50 (probably young healthy) drivers use their cars more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blocking curb cuts (Bayridge article) is simply an affront to all anyone who is disabled, especially those in wheelchairs, a parent with a stroller or just someone using a shopping cart (ok, granny cart) to bring home some groceries. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also leaving fewer options for dropping off people from cars or taxis</p>
<p>Having to walk long distance around obstacles like blocked streets kills pedestrian traffic. Any businesses, schools, senior centers, medical offices, and local residents should be opposed to these measures. It will make these streets even more dangerous, less neighborly and less inviting to those who need to most help in getting around. All so another 50 (probably young healthy) drivers use their cars more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/03/19/todays-headlines-609/comment-page-1/#comment-64846</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5704#comment-64846</guid>
		<description>Looks like our boy Weiner finally did something useful with that ground floor retail survey.  I almost got a question on space occupancy added to the 1992 Economis Censuses, which would have created a census of non-residential real estate, but was stymied for budgetary reasons.  I tried again in 1997, and then gave up.

The bottom line is that vacancy is a function of price as well as demand.  Due to a longstanding shortage, landlords had hiked up commercial rents to ridiculous heights, to the point where you had to charge $4 for a cup of coffee to make money.  So before one assumes that higher vacancy is a bad thing, ask the question &quot;bad for whom?&quot;  Not bad for someone who wants to start a business.

Just as the political class thinks they and theirs own New York and the rest of us are here to be milked with nothing in between, so the real estate portion of the executive class needs to be take down a peg.  It&#039;s the end of the housing bubble as we know it and I feel fine, despite the reduction in the fake value of my house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like our boy Weiner finally did something useful with that ground floor retail survey.  I almost got a question on space occupancy added to the 1992 Economis Censuses, which would have created a census of non-residential real estate, but was stymied for budgetary reasons.  I tried again in 1997, and then gave up.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that vacancy is a function of price as well as demand.  Due to a longstanding shortage, landlords had hiked up commercial rents to ridiculous heights, to the point where you had to charge $4 for a cup of coffee to make money.  So before one assumes that higher vacancy is a bad thing, ask the question &#8220;bad for whom?&#8221;  Not bad for someone who wants to start a business.</p>
<p>Just as the political class thinks they and theirs own New York and the rest of us are here to be milked with nothing in between, so the real estate portion of the executive class needs to be take down a peg.  It&#8217;s the end of the housing bubble as we know it and I feel fine, despite the reduction in the fake value of my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

