"While Broadway's existing bike lane will remain intact it was, notably, de-emphasized in DOT's renderings. Broadway will now be considered a "pedestrian priority" street and Sadik-Khan said she expected the bike lane would mainly be used by tourists and PEDICABS" [emphasis added-pm]

Was this mentioned at her press conference? This is a very positive development for the pedicab trade that for years has been denied the ability to create pedicab stands after pitches made to the DOT, etc. for a way to limit the roaming and over-crowding and improve the quality and appease certain theater owners.

At least having access to a portion of this new pedestrian territory as you note may decrease the tickets pedicabs receive (more so than others) for stopping anywhere along Broadway right now in the theater district.

In short, this is huge.

-pm

Let's cross that bridge when we come to it. We certainly aren't coming to it with a measly $2 bridge toll and the closure of a stretch of Broadway that blocks more traffic than it moves.

Or is the answer Just keep raising the toll! Just to drive more traffic out. Just to rasie the toll, just to drive more traffic out.

PS maybe you all missed it, but the ideilic pedestrian space is going to have an "Emergency Lane down the middle. Should be fun watching the turists jump out of the way of the fire truck.

(Like, so I can fix my 10,000th typo, above.)

Question: How do you do quotes here. I tried clicking on link but nothing happens.

to to the above, I entered

<blockquote>
Question: How do you do quotes here. I tried clicking on link but nothing happens.
</blockquote>

I'm glad they're not spending too much on the stations. The MTA site doesn't specifically state why the Merrick Blvd route was halted. All I know about Rogers/Nostrand was that elimination of parking was a neighborhood concern. I still think that Flatlands Corridor would have been a much better choice than Nostrand. You could have served two shopping centers, JFK and local shopping areas.

Question: How do you do quotes here. I tried clicking on link but nothing happens.

I have not been paying attention to the local politics so I wouldn't know why it is taking so long, but I would think money has a lot to do with it.

Based on what I've read they're doing this fairly cheaply - no iconic stations - so I don't think money has that much to do with it. NIMBYism basically killed the Merrick Boulevard route, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was what's delaying the 1st/2nd Avenue and Rogers/Nostrand lines. If you find out anything, please let us know.

This will mean that since the taxis are going to have to go around and around we will be paying more for cabs.

Brooklyn, you are not alone. Are those of you who are so gun ho about this plan New Yorkers? I was raised in Manhattan and worked at Broadway and 40th. Broadway is the only two way avenue for blocks on either side. The roads are one way. Can you imagine what one will have to do to turn around?

If you guys are from NY, than where is your open mind about those who are not from NY. Or do you not need NJ residents coming to NY. We do more than support the arts, shows, sports, and work we pay a lot of your taxes. My daughter works in front of Duffy Square, she uses 'mass transportation,' and getting a taxi, when she works late, to catch the bus will be very difficult. She would have to walk a couple of blocks but the cabs won't take her for just 3 blocks.

While some of you are just thinking of 'enjoying' Time Square, a lot of people have to work there. Think of others, it could enrich your lives.

"But with less cars wouldn't there also be less cars double parked?"

I sure hope that would be the case but I wouldn't count on it. You are correct citing better enforcement and a change in parking policies.

Cap'n Transit:

I have not been paying attention to the local politics so I wouldn't know why it is taking so long, but I would think money has a lot to do with it. I also wouldn't be surprised if the merchants are delaying it. But if they are, I would hope it is because of legitmate concerns that are being addressed. In many instances the big guys doing the planning are not aware of the little nuances that really do matter and can be addressed by making small changes. Then you also have the NIMBY's who would rather inconvenience many because of their selfish concerns.

Marketing,fancy vehicles and stations may not seem like much to you, but it may make the difference between a tourist using BRT and hopping into a taxi.
Of course getting buses moving are just as if not more important, and they are all related. A bus that is easier to circulate in also speeds the buses.

In 1985, I spoke to the then head of the TA's Operations Planning. I told him that a prime reason why tourists don't use buses is that they do not know where they go. I suggested that the routes in Manhattan be renumbered to correspond with the streets and avenues they operate on so tourists feel more comfortable about riding buses. (This was when the destination signs only showed route numbers and destinations.) He told me that this was a dumb idea that wasn't necessary to encourage ridership. Four weeks later, most of the crosstowns were all renumbered just as I suggested, the M34 and M42 among them. I still believe that user-friendliness goes a long way to attract the occasional rider who may be afraid of public transit.

- Make the Gowanus HOV lane two-way and 24/7
- Run more express buses
- Extend the Church Street Transitway north, and institute a parallel southbound route
- Institute through-running of buses to New Jersey and the Bronx

One of the main reasons it's taking so long to implement the first five routes is because they're getting so much opposition from local merchants and drivers. You must have seen that in the Bedford Avenue pilot. Have the local leaders and merchants lined up behind it, or have they done everything they could to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt without coming up with their own workable plan to move buses?