<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Challenges in Getting Transit Funded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:49:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barnard</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-63217</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5458#comment-63217</guid>
		<description>TV news is particularly anti-transit. My theory is because reporters and camera crews drive everywhere and almost never take transit.

At least newspaper reports (in cities at least) often take public transit (or even ride their bikes.

Ken (#2), I think your point about auto ads on TV is right on too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV news is particularly anti-transit. My theory is because reporters and camera crews drive everywhere and almost never take transit.</p>
<p>At least newspaper reports (in cities at least) often take public transit (or even ride their bikes.</p>
<p>Ken (#2), I think your point about auto ads on TV is right on too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. K. Lis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-63131</link>
		<dc:creator>W. K. Lis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5458#comment-63131</guid>
		<description>Ken O., another reason is lawyers. They will be paid more due to auto collisions. And lawyers usually end up as politicians. So they don&#039;t want transit because it wouldn&#039;t create work for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken O., another reason is lawyers. They will be paid more due to auto collisions. And lawyers usually end up as politicians. So they don't want transit because it wouldn't create work for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I \v/ NY</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-63126</link>
		<dc:creator>I \v/ NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5458#comment-63126</guid>
		<description>^
heres the video

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4802241n

HSR is around 0:50</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^<br />
heres the video</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4802241n" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4802241n</a></p>
<p>HSR is around 0:50</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I \v/ NY</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-63125</link>
		<dc:creator>I \v/ NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5458#comment-63125</guid>
		<description>cbs evening news tonight just singled out the $8 billion for high speed rail as questionable and wasteful infrastructure spending along with money for filipino WWII veterans. nevermind that CA HSR construction would be one of the biggest infrastructure projects ever undertaken in the US and one of the biggest job creation programs.

and then theres that blinded by right wing ideology john boerner who said &quot;we need jobs not spending&quot; does he fuc*ing think jobs grow on trees? or drop down out of the sky from the almighty one? actually he probably does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cbs evening news tonight just singled out the $8 billion for high speed rail as questionable and wasteful infrastructure spending along with money for filipino WWII veterans. nevermind that CA HSR construction would be one of the biggest infrastructure projects ever undertaken in the US and one of the biggest job creation programs.</p>
<p>and then theres that blinded by right wing ideology john boerner who said "we need jobs not spending" does he fuc*ing think jobs grow on trees? or drop down out of the sky from the almighty one? actually he probably does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken O.</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-63116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5458#comment-63116</guid>
		<description>Why would media attack public transit? Two reasons:

1) They get no advertising dollars from it (as with car companies, dealers, and insurance)
2) Negative attacks get more viewer eyeballs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would media attack public transit? Two reasons:</p>
<p>1) They get no advertising dollars from it (as with car companies, dealers, and insurance)<br />
2) Negative attacks get more viewer eyeballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/13/the-challenges-in-getting-transit-funded/comment-page-1/#comment-63097</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5458#comment-63097</guid>
		<description>Apparently, the purpose of the stimulus is to get people working at building politically-determined infrastructure that we can&#039;t afford to operate. Makes perfect sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, the purpose of the stimulus is to get people working at building politically-determined infrastructure that we can't afford to operate. Makes perfect sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
