<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/comment-page-1/#comment-62899</link>
		<dc:creator>Veritas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5442#comment-62899</guid>
		<description>The killings of pedestrians get worse and worse. Will these drivers be charged with crimes?

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/pedestrian-is-struck-and-dragged-17-miles/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The killings of pedestrians get worse and worse. Will these drivers be charged with crimes?</p>
<p><a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/pedestrian-is-struck-and-dragged-17-miles/" rel="nofollow">http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/pedestrian-is-struck-and-dragged-17-miles/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhywun</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/comment-page-1/#comment-62875</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5442#comment-62875</guid>
		<description>Will any of the idling bills do a thing to stop the long queue of *MTA buses* that stretches down both sides Trinity Place every day, pumping diesel exhaust directly into the Rector Street R/W subway station?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will any of the idling bills do a thing to stop the long queue of *MTA buses* that stretches down both sides Trinity Place every day, pumping diesel exhaust directly into the Rector Street R/W subway station?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/comment-page-1/#comment-62870</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5442#comment-62870</guid>
		<description>Re: idling, I also made the following comment on MTR:

There is another, arguably more important anti-idling bill which deserves support: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nyccouncil.info/html/legislation/legislation_details.cfm?ID=Int%200881-2008&amp;TYPE=all&amp;YEAR=2006&amp;SPONSORS=YES&amp;REPORTS=YES&amp;HISTORY=YES&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Int 881&lt;/a&gt;.

Idling is one of those offenses about which people fret “there won’t be any enforcement.” Well, Int 881 addresses that in a very effective way, and is, I think, a linchpin in the goal of finally stopping the useless, constant spewing of poison into our air. It enables Traffic Enforcement Agents (”parking agents”), using their handheld ticket-writing computers, to issue idling summonses.

Ask any NYC motorist: traffic agents are extremely–seemingly magically–reliable at issuing summonses. That is in contrast with patrol cops who generally don’t issues summonses for things like idling, and with DEP inspectors who are, when it comes to ticketing the thousands of vehicles that idle each day, impossibly scarce.

Also, remember that idling is implicated in four deaths in this January alone: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/05/grieving-chinatown-families-to-morgenthau-were-not-going-away/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;two toddlers&lt;/a&gt; in Chinatown and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/02/nyregion/02hit.html?_r=2&amp;ref=nyregion&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;two young men&lt;/a&gt; in Queens.

Surely idling rarely causes such immediate deaths, but these four people wouldn’t be dead without it. Why allow that risk? What good does idling do to warrant that risk?

Demand fast action on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nyccouncil.info/html/legislation/legislation_details.cfm?ID=Int%200881-2008&amp;TYPE=all&amp;YEAR=2006&amp;SPONSORS=YES&amp;REPORTS=YES&amp;HISTORY=YES&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Int 881&lt;/a&gt;.


And I hope my crude attempts at html work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: idling, I also made the following comment on MTR:</p>
<p>There is another, arguably more important anti-idling bill which deserves support: <a href="http://www.nyccouncil.info/html/legislation/legislation_details.cfm?ID=Int%200881-2008&amp;TYPE=all&amp;YEAR=2006&amp;SPONSORS=YES&amp;REPORTS=YES&amp;HISTORY=YES" rel="nofollow">Int 881</a>.</p>
<p>Idling is one of those offenses about which people fret “there won’t be any enforcement.” Well, Int 881 addresses that in a very effective way, and is, I think, a linchpin in the goal of finally stopping the useless, constant spewing of poison into our air. It enables Traffic Enforcement Agents (”parking agents”), using their handheld ticket-writing computers, to issue idling summonses.</p>
<p>Ask any NYC motorist: traffic agents are extremely–seemingly magically–reliable at issuing summonses. That is in contrast with patrol cops who generally don’t issues summonses for things like idling, and with DEP inspectors who are, when it comes to ticketing the thousands of vehicles that idle each day, impossibly scarce.</p>
<p>Also, remember that idling is implicated in four deaths in this January alone: <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/05/grieving-chinatown-families-to-morgenthau-were-not-going-away/" rel="nofollow">two toddlers</a> in Chinatown and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/02/nyregion/02hit.html?_r=2&amp;ref=nyregion" rel="nofollow">two young men</a> in Queens.</p>
<p>Surely idling rarely causes such immediate deaths, but these four people wouldn’t be dead without it. Why allow that risk? What good does idling do to warrant that risk?</p>
<p>Demand fast action on <a href="http://www.nyccouncil.info/html/legislation/legislation_details.cfm?ID=Int%200881-2008&amp;TYPE=all&amp;YEAR=2006&amp;SPONSORS=YES&amp;REPORTS=YES&amp;HISTORY=YES" rel="nofollow">Int 881</a>.</p>
<p>And I hope my crude attempts at html work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shishi</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/comment-page-1/#comment-62869</link>
		<dc:creator>shishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5442#comment-62869</guid>
		<description>Ryan you are right,but the Met Council covers the region.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan you are right,but the Met Council covers the region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/comment-page-1/#comment-62868</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5442#comment-62868</guid>
		<description>When I read &quot;Twin Cities,&quot; I think Minneapolis/St. Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read &#8220;Twin Cities,&#8221; I think Minneapolis/St. Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/comment-page-1/#comment-62867</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5442#comment-62867</guid>
		<description>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7881079.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7881079.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7881079.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David_K</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/todays-headlines-583/comment-page-1/#comment-62864</link>
		<dc:creator>David_K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5442#comment-62864</guid>
		<description>I think that making Kent go one way (north) would solve the problem with the bike paths, but maybe I&#039;m missing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that making Kent go one way (north) would solve the problem with the bike paths, but maybe I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

