<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiki Wednesday: Transit and the Stimulus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:40:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niccolo Machiavelli</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-62062</link>
		<dc:creator>Niccolo Machiavelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5301#comment-62062</guid>
		<description>&quot;Shovel-ready&quot; just a clever piece of language framing to put highway projects at the front of the line for stimulus money. I argue that funding transit operating budgets will be far more stimulative in the short run and the long run than the next yard of concrete.  Nonetheless, by setting &quot;shovel-ready&quot; as the standard it is probably true that there are more blueprints on file for new roads than there is for anything else.  Add to that the greater NIMBY resistance that transit historically has generated and you have a very bad picture shaping up.

I&#039;m shovel ready tomorrow to start working on opening the Rockaway Branch to rail service, but I think the neighbors would quickly have their political guardians armed to the teeth before we got shovels in the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Shovel-ready" just a clever piece of language framing to put highway projects at the front of the line for stimulus money. I argue that funding transit operating budgets will be far more stimulative in the short run and the long run than the next yard of concrete.  Nonetheless, by setting "shovel-ready" as the standard it is probably true that there are more blueprints on file for new roads than there is for anything else.  Add to that the greater NIMBY resistance that transit historically has generated and you have a very bad picture shaping up.</p>
<p>I'm shovel ready tomorrow to start working on opening the Rockaway Branch to rail service, but I think the neighbors would quickly have their political guardians armed to the teeth before we got shovels in the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schuylkill Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-62005</link>
		<dc:creator>Schuylkill Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5301#comment-62005</guid>
		<description>Is anybody in the Network tracking bike/ped funding in the stimulus bills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anybody in the Network tracking bike/ped funding in the stimulus bills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bamberg</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-61934</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bamberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5301#comment-61934</guid>
		<description>Love that futuristic-looking BART train.

Check out my book...http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Photo-Opportunities-San-Francisco/dp/1598638009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love that futuristic-looking BART train.</p>
<p>Check out my book...http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Photo-Opportunities-San-Francisco/dp/1598638009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-61933</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5301#comment-61933</guid>
		<description>Shovel-ready is shorthand for &#039;will be paid for before the stimulus plan has outlived its usefulness.&#039; You don&#039;t want to fund a huge project that will be finished like 10 years after the recession you were trying to jolt your way out of. It will cause inflation. A Big Dig scenario for transit will pretty much kill any hope for a rational transportation policy in this country for a generation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shovel-ready is shorthand for 'will be paid for before the stimulus plan has outlived its usefulness.' You don't want to fund a huge project that will be finished like 10 years after the recession you were trying to jolt your way out of. It will cause inflation. A Big Dig scenario for transit will pretty much kill any hope for a rational transportation policy in this country for a generation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-61932</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5301#comment-61932</guid>
		<description>I was told that transit projects weren&#039;t &quot;shovel ready&quot; and therefore not fall into the stimulus plan. Can someone explain this. When does something be classified as shovel ready?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told that transit projects weren't "shovel ready" and therefore not fall into the stimulus plan. Can someone explain this. When does something be classified as shovel ready?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaja</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/21/wiki-wednesday-transit-and-the-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-61926</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=5301#comment-61926</guid>
		<description>People such as ourselves should try making use of the new Office of the Public Liaison. I&#039;m all fired up to get cynical about this too, but I&#039;m not just there yet. 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/opl/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People such as ourselves should try making use of the new Office of the Public Liaison. I'm all fired up to get cynical about this too, but I'm not just there yet. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/opl/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/opl/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
