Comments on: Stimulus Draft, the Day After

By: Angus Grieve-Smith

Angus Grieve-Smith — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:55:02 +0000

It’s two sentences. The first word looks like it should be “many.” I understand it okay – but I don’t agree with it.

By: gary fisher

gary fisher — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:44:24 +0000

Is the first post even a sentence?

By: Emett Stasiuk

Emett Stasiuk — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:13:45 +0000

Green and Zero Emission Stimulus should be easy. I built a website around that idea… and here we are. Please check out Unpollute.ning.com

By: Aaron Antrim

Aaron Antrim — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:14:45 +0000

Something I’m frustrated by is that the big transit advocacy groups seem to burying the heads in the sand, or at least trying to bury their members’ and constituents’ heads in the sand about what’s going on.

Check out APTA (the American Public Transit Association’s) bulletin on the stimulus unveiling:
http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/aptapt/issues/2009-01-19/index.html

APTA is a multi-million dollar organization. APTA, CTAA, NARP and others need to get smarter and more aggressive about lobbying. How can we all help?

I posted something in an APTA LinkedIn group to ask why the organizing seems so tepid.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:41:54 +0000

Man argue, rightly, that conventional mass transit is not a viable (read: preferable) transportation option. If you want one that is, check out CyberTran.com