In the metro and RER they set up checkpoints in transfer corridors, usually around a corner so that they see everyone who sees them, and can run after people who turn around. Most metro corridors are one-way, possibly to help with this.

Most transit users have monthly or weekly passes, but single-ride tickets are date-stamped in metro turnstiles. There are stamping machines in the buses (at both doors, allowing for front and rear access) and commuter rail stations, but no turnstiles.

In Santo Domingo, the high-end buses have turnstiles at the front, operated by cashiers who make change. The independently-operated vans (“guaguas”) all have conductors who are responsible for announcing the route and stops, collecting fares and making change. I never saw anyone try to avoid paying, so I don’t know what would happen to them.

But 3 inspectors on a bus would be a tight fit. If it’s one unarmed ticket inspector on a bus, a stabbing would be just as likely to happen, I would imagine.

If that passenger was willing to stab the bus driver over the fare, do we have any reason to believe he wouldn’t also be willing to stab a ticket inspector over the same thing?

Two options. Either make them cover most or all of their costs.

Or force riders to listen to repeated automated announcements telling them that they are subsidized, whereas the less well off people who ride the subways are not, and are in fact funding their commute.

A third option — build some of those big bike-storage facilities at the end of the subway lines, so those living beyond walking distance of the subway could get some exercise on their way to work. Commuting by bike has made me see those locations in a new, possibly more positive way.

I’ve also suggested building park and ride lots over the N train, which is crowded but could add trains if we had them, for drivers from places like Staten Island, Dyker Heights, Marine Park, etc. It’s a quick ride from 59th to Times Square when the Manhattan Bridge isn’t half out of action for 20 years at a time.

I (and perhaps the Prince) would like to see the subway system be self-supporting, to prevent the state legislature from causing its collapse.

Others embrace the Kheel plan, providing only the transit service than can be afforded for zero fare, based on the political competition for limited tax dollars.

Then there was the suggestion of free buses on 34th Street, on the grounds that most people there had already paid elsewhere and just get free transfers anyway — the same arguement used to make the Staten Island Ferry free.

How about striving for fare-paid operating cost break-even on the subways and commuter rail, and making the buses free? Three woudl be no more “free transfer” to the subway, but the buses themselves would be free. The MTA would be responsible for the quality of service on the subways.

But the number, crowding and condition of the buses would be up to the city and state, dependent on the availability of subsidies. The bus schedules could even be politicized, with the city council and state legislature determining what gets subsidized and what doesn’t, and who gets how much service.

Note that I don’t generally use the buses.