<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CB12 Committee Asks DOT for Dyckman Greenway Connector Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/11/06/cb12-committee-asks-dot-for-dyckman-greenway-connector-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/11/06/cb12-committee-asks-dot-for-dyckman-greenway-connector-study/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Urbanis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/11/06/cb12-committee-asks-dot-for-dyckman-greenway-connector-study/comment-page-1/#comment-58682</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4892#comment-58682</guid>
		<description>JK, as one of those folks in Inwood, what I can say but thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JK, as one of those folks in Inwood, what I can say but thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/11/06/cb12-committee-asks-dot-for-dyckman-greenway-connector-study/comment-page-1/#comment-58661</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4892#comment-58661</guid>
		<description>For New Yorkers, this is the most important news that Streetsblog has posted this week. This is a rare example of a new community board asking for something positive because of organized, and persistent, community action. The transportation reform movement is not paying nearly enough attention to community boards. This despite DOT doing much, much more in supportive community boards. The lower Manhattan CBs gets a new project every other week (Grand Street, 9th Ave cycletrack extension, Madison Square, Bway Blvd etc.) Elsewhere pre-reform thinking, like installing turning bays into shopping mall parking lots and refusing speed humps (Metropolitan Ave, Bklyn) is common because there is no organized reform voice. These folks in Inwood get huge credit for getting out and actually pushing in the community boards. Which, like it or not, are the recognized political forums in this city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For New Yorkers, this is the most important news that Streetsblog has posted this week. This is a rare example of a new community board asking for something positive because of organized, and persistent, community action. The transportation reform movement is not paying nearly enough attention to community boards. This despite DOT doing much, much more in supportive community boards. The lower Manhattan CBs gets a new project every other week (Grand Street, 9th Ave cycletrack extension, Madison Square, Bway Blvd etc.) Elsewhere pre-reform thinking, like installing turning bays into shopping mall parking lots and refusing speed humps (Metropolitan Ave, Bklyn) is common because there is no organized reform voice. These folks in Inwood get huge credit for getting out and actually pushing in the community boards. Which, like it or not, are the recognized political forums in this city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
