<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Interruption Planned for Hudson Greenway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:43:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PayngItNow</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58291</link>
		<dc:creator>PayngItNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58291</guid>
		<description>&quot;PayingItNow, I think you&#039;re depriving yourself of some of the most magnificent night views in New York by leaving the Greenway at 96th Street. The approach to the GWB at night along the water is worth the trip alone.&quot;
Maybe, but given that I won&#039;t ride on Cherry walk after dark, it&#039;s too much hassle getting to and from the path.  Once up on RSD, might as well stay there.  I&#039;m not sightseeing; I&#039;m trying to get home.

&quot; I have never worried about being attacked,&quot;
There were a few reports of muggings last year, as well as the &quot;tack attacks&quot;.  The section that runs next to the Sewage treatment plant is like a cattle chute -- no way out once you&#039;re in.  After dark, no thanks.

&quot; but I agree 100% that the Cherry Walk&quot;
At Cherry walk, I don&#039;t think lighting would even help.  The path is just too close to the oncoming traffic, and there are too many places where you&#039;re just staring directly into headlight glare.

&quot;and the 162nd-165th stretch present numerous safety hazards due to inadequate/non-existent lighting.&quot;
That section actually doesn&#039;t bother me that much. I know where all the holes are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"PayingItNow, I think you're depriving yourself of some of the most magnificent night views in New York by leaving the Greenway at 96th Street. The approach to the GWB at night along the water is worth the trip alone."<br />
Maybe, but given that I won't ride on Cherry walk after dark, it's too much hassle getting to and from the path.  Once up on RSD, might as well stay there.  I'm not sightseeing; I'm trying to get home.</p>
<p>" I have never worried about being attacked,"<br />
There were a few reports of muggings last year, as well as the "tack attacks".  The section that runs next to the Sewage treatment plant is like a cattle chute -- no way out once you're in.  After dark, no thanks.</p>
<p>" but I agree 100% that the Cherry Walk"<br />
At Cherry walk, I don't think lighting would even help.  The path is just too close to the oncoming traffic, and there are too many places where you're just staring directly into headlight glare.</p>
<p>"and the 162nd-165th stretch present numerous safety hazards due to inadequate/non-existent lighting."<br />
That section actually doesn't bother me that much. I know where all the holes are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58267</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58267</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://gawker.com/364894/video-hooded-terrorist-coward-flees-times-square-attack&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Never Forget 03-06-08&lt;/a&gt;, Urbanis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gawker.com/364894/video-hooded-terrorist-coward-flees-times-square-attack" rel="nofollow">Never Forget 03-06-08</a>, Urbanis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58262</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58262</guid>
		<description>Re: John Deere&#039;s comment, is there any documented case of an act of terrorism being committed on a bicycle? Whereas we know of numerous acts of terrorism being committed via cars. And yet, cyclists are prevented from using the GWB between midnight and 6 a.m., while car traffic continues unimpeded, nor can one even bring a bicycles outside of City Hall because it &quot;might&quot; be used as a weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: John Deere's comment, is there any documented case of an act of terrorism being committed on a bicycle? Whereas we know of numerous acts of terrorism being committed via cars. And yet, cyclists are prevented from using the GWB between midnight and 6 a.m., while car traffic continues unimpeded, nor can one even bring a bicycles outside of City Hall because it "might" be used as a weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58261</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58261</guid>
		<description>PayingItNow, I think you&#039;re depriving yourself of some of the most magnificent night views in New York by leaving the Greenway at 96th Street. The approach to the GWB at night along the water is worth the trip alone. I have never worried about being attacked, but I agree 100% that the Cherry Walk and the 162nd-165th stretch present numerous safety hazards due to inadequate/non-existent lighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PayingItNow, I think you're depriving yourself of some of the most magnificent night views in New York by leaving the Greenway at 96th Street. The approach to the GWB at night along the water is worth the trip alone. I have never worried about being attacked, but I agree 100% that the Cherry Walk and the 162nd-165th stretch present numerous safety hazards due to inadequate/non-existent lighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayingItNow</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58225</link>
		<dc:creator>PayingItNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58225</guid>
		<description>This time of year, on the way home I exit the path at 96th St. and take Riverside Drive all the way up to 165, then head up Ft. Washington (I live in the 180s).  Cherry Walk is suicide because of the headlights, and the Greenway above 135th is too desolate and creepy in the dark for me (a generally pretty fearless male, fwiw).  I guess I&#039;ll just have to do the same thing in the mornings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time of year, on the way home I exit the path at 96th St. and take Riverside Drive all the way up to 165, then head up Ft. Washington (I live in the 180s).  Cherry Walk is suicide because of the headlights, and the Greenway above 135th is too desolate and creepy in the dark for me (a generally pretty fearless male, fwiw).  I guess I'll just have to do the same thing in the mornings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Deere</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58205</link>
		<dc:creator>John Deere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58205</guid>
		<description>Gee, thanks Port Authority.  Now we get to take a long climb up 181st St. so we can descend back to the path at 158th (or a long climb up 158th so we can descend back to the path at 181st).  I&#039;m sure if something needed to be done on the Manhattan anchorage of the GW Bridge, y&#039;all wouldn&#039;t close down the Henry Hudson Parkway for 6 - 8 weeks, would you?  But since cyclists are 2nd class citizens in your mind, it&#039;s not a big deal.   Don&#039;t think so?  How about that ongoing night time closure of the GW Bridge bike path for &quot;security reasons&quot;.  Don&#039;t see y&#039;all closing down the whole bridge to all those potential truck &amp; car bombs overnight.

As for access to 158th--just go through the gate near 158th, turn left up the ramp.  Not a big deal.  Same for coming down.  Just go down the hill on 158th to the end, turn left, go down the ramp.  The ramp has two-way traffic, and not that much of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, thanks Port Authority.  Now we get to take a long climb up 181st St. so we can descend back to the path at 158th (or a long climb up 158th so we can descend back to the path at 181st).  I'm sure if something needed to be done on the Manhattan anchorage of the GW Bridge, y'all wouldn't close down the Henry Hudson Parkway for 6 - 8 weeks, would you?  But since cyclists are 2nd class citizens in your mind, it's not a big deal.   Don't think so?  How about that ongoing night time closure of the GW Bridge bike path for "security reasons".  Don't see y'all closing down the whole bridge to all those potential truck &amp; car bombs overnight.</p>
<p>As for access to 158th--just go through the gate near 158th, turn left up the ramp.  Not a big deal.  Same for coming down.  Just go down the hill on 158th to the end, turn left, go down the ramp.  The ramp has two-way traffic, and not that much of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58162</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58162</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Probably the biggest drawback is that it looks more like an invitation to a mugging than a waterfront access point. The first time I used it I just followed some joggers who said they were going down to the river. Marking the trail with Greenway signs would make a big difference.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
True, you want people going through there on a regular basis to get those &quot;eyes on the street.&quot;  But if any brave individuals would measure the amount of time it takes to detour that way vs. the Port Authority&#039;s planned detour, that could bolster the case for restoring it.  Thanks again for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Probably the biggest drawback is that it looks more like an invitation to a mugging than a waterfront access point. The first time I used it I just followed some joggers who said they were going down to the river. Marking the trail with Greenway signs would make a big difference.</p></blockquote>
<p>True, you want people going through there on a regular basis to get those "eyes on the street."  But if any brave individuals would measure the amount of time it takes to detour that way vs. the Port Authority's planned detour, that could bolster the case for restoring it.  Thanks again for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58159</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58159</guid>
		<description>Cap&#039;n Transit

From what I remember there&#039;s a bit of gravel/small stones in the path that could be swept aside but most of the path is rideable with 700x25 tires.

The stairs around the bridge are no worse than other steps on the Greenway but it would be safer to have some signage there warning  cyclists that they need to dismount. I think there&#039;s also a short tunnel before the bridge. Maybe wooden ramps, like those used around the 79th Street Rotunda, would be a quick fix but the last time I was there I happened across a guy with a moped who had no problem getting it down the steps. Pushing it up might be a bit more challenging.

Probably the biggest drawback is that it looks more like an invitation to a mugging than a waterfront access point. The first time I used it I just followed some joggers who said they were going down to the river. Marking the trail with Greenway signs would make a big difference.

It could probably be restored for less money than DOT and the Parks Dept spends when they want to temporarily reroute the bike path through  Riverside South, or between Chelsea Piers and the Gansvoort Street  Sanitation facility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cap'n Transit</p>
<p>From what I remember there's a bit of gravel/small stones in the path that could be swept aside but most of the path is rideable with 700x25 tires.</p>
<p>The stairs around the bridge are no worse than other steps on the Greenway but it would be safer to have some signage there warning  cyclists that they need to dismount. I think there's also a short tunnel before the bridge. Maybe wooden ramps, like those used around the 79th Street Rotunda, would be a quick fix but the last time I was there I happened across a guy with a moped who had no problem getting it down the steps. Pushing it up might be a bit more challenging.</p>
<p>Probably the biggest drawback is that it looks more like an invitation to a mugging than a waterfront access point. The first time I used it I just followed some joggers who said they were going down to the river. Marking the trail with Greenway signs would make a big difference.</p>
<p>It could probably be restored for less money than DOT and the Parks Dept spends when they want to temporarily reroute the bike path through  Riverside South, or between Chelsea Piers and the Gansvoort Street  Sanitation facility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58157</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58157</guid>
		<description>indeed, it would be wonderful if they repaired the w176th st. access point.


in the meantime, here, http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=west+158th+street+new+york+city&amp;sll=40.852189,-73.937559&amp;sspn=0.031487,0.077248&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=40.83579,-73.948127&amp;spn=0.001968,0.004828&amp;t=h&amp;z=18 w158th is a piece of cake.

(hope the url works)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indeed, it would be wonderful if they repaired the w176th st. access point.</p>
<p>in the meantime, here, <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=west+158th+street+new+york+city&amp;sll=40.852189,-73.937559&amp;sspn=0.031487,0.077248&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=40.83579,-73.948127&amp;spn=0.001968,0.004828&amp;t=h&amp;z=18" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=west+158th+street+new+york+city&amp;sll=40.852189,-73.937559&amp;sspn=0.031487,0.077248&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=40.83579,-73.948127&amp;spn=0.001968,0.004828&amp;t=h&amp;z=18</a> w158th is a piece of cake.</p>
<p>(hope the url works)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58150</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58150</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, Stacy!  I wonder what it would take to pave it, put in a ramp and make it safer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, Stacy!  I wonder what it would take to pave it, put in a ramp and make it safer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58149</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58149</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used that &quot;abandoned&quot; access point twice. The last time was only a couple of weeks ago. It begins somewhere behind Columbia Presbyterian and looks like a well worn path running alongside some exit ramp. It&#039;s unpaved, unmarked, and has a few steps  but  eventually it makes its way across that Amtrak bridge and leaves you right by the bathrooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've used that "abandoned" access point twice. The last time was only a couple of weeks ago. It begins somewhere behind Columbia Presbyterian and looks like a well worn path running alongside some exit ramp. It's unpaved, unmarked, and has a few steps  but  eventually it makes its way across that Amtrak bridge and leaves you right by the bathrooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58146</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58146</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve ridden past that access a jillion times but have never investigated it. It&#039;s a staircase, I believe, so to make it bike-friendly it would need to be ramped. My higher priority would be to install lighting or (at least) reflectors and reflective paint along the stretch between 162nd and 165th streets (behind the courts and next to the Amtrak rails). It&#039;s pitch dark in there after sunset and presents some real safety hazards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've ridden past that access a jillion times but have never investigated it. It's a staircase, I believe, so to make it bike-friendly it would need to be ramped. My higher priority would be to install lighting or (at least) reflectors and reflective paint along the stretch between 162nd and 165th streets (behind the courts and next to the Amtrak rails). It's pitch dark in there after sunset and presents some real safety hazards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58133</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58133</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s funny that &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=40.846553,-73.944308&amp;spn=0.001968,0.006866&amp;t=h&amp;z=18&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the access&lt;/a&gt; seems to show up on Google Maps as a path.  It doesn&#039;t exist any more, does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it's funny that <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=40.846553,-73.944308&amp;spn=0.001968,0.006866&amp;t=h&amp;z=18" rel="nofollow">the access</a> seems to show up on Google Maps as a path.  It doesn't exist any more, does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58132</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58132</guid>
		<description>Live Search shows what looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&amp;FORM=LMLTCP&amp;cp=qt71zq8v40wq&amp;style=o&amp;lvl=2&amp;tilt=-90&amp;dir=0&amp;alt=-1000&amp;scene=23701905&amp;phx=0&amp;phy=0&amp;phscl=1&amp;encType=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an abandoned access&lt;/a&gt; to the greenway just south of the bridge at around 176th Street.  In fact, it looks like there&#039;s a huge chunk o&#039; park that was at one point a nice place to walk around in, but was simply commandeered for the parkway/bridge interchange.

What if the Port Authority were interested in actually accommodating greenway users, rather than just keeping them away from the staging area?  How much do you think it would cost to rebuild the greenway access?  It would not only cut the detour down from thirty blocks to eleven, but it would also improve access to the waterfront for the lower-income people living in southern Washington Heights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live Search shows what looks like <a href="http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&amp;FORM=LMLTCP&amp;cp=qt71zq8v40wq&amp;style=o&amp;lvl=2&amp;tilt=-90&amp;dir=0&amp;alt=-1000&amp;scene=23701905&amp;phx=0&amp;phy=0&amp;phscl=1&amp;encType=1" rel="nofollow">an abandoned access</a> to the greenway just south of the bridge at around 176th Street.  In fact, it looks like there's a huge chunk o' park that was at one point a nice place to walk around in, but was simply commandeered for the parkway/bridge interchange.</p>
<p>What if the Port Authority were interested in actually accommodating greenway users, rather than just keeping them away from the staging area?  How much do you think it would cost to rebuild the greenway access?  It would not only cut the detour down from thirty blocks to eleven, but it would also improve access to the waterfront for the lower-income people living in southern Washington Heights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58131</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58131</guid>
		<description>I used the access point at the end of 155th Street once and wouldn&#039;t recommend it to anyone. First I had to carry my bike down an awful lot of stairs. Then, despite the fact that I looked both ways before venturing into the crosswalk I nearly got hit by a car coming around the blind turn. I guess the trick is to first look north and then south.

If DOT expects commuters to use this alternate route they probably should plan a specific detour and improve traffic signals. I think there may have been a flashing yellow light but if cars don&#039;t expect to see pedestrians they&#039;re not going to slow down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the access point at the end of 155th Street once and wouldn't recommend it to anyone. First I had to carry my bike down an awful lot of stairs. Then, despite the fact that I looked both ways before venturing into the crosswalk I nearly got hit by a car coming around the blind turn. I guess the trick is to first look north and then south.</p>
<p>If DOT expects commuters to use this alternate route they probably should plan a specific detour and improve traffic signals. I think there may have been a flashing yellow light but if cars don't expect to see pedestrians they're not going to slow down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LN</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58122</link>
		<dc:creator>LN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58122</guid>
		<description>I travel that route everyday, the only way it works is because there&#039;s not that many others that do it. This is going to be chaos.

You can either go up/down the zig zag ramp, contesting with everyone else on that ramp or just take the on/off ramp to the Henry Hudson up to 158th and go onto the greenway at 157. Then you have a recently paved but very steep hill to go up to/down from Broadway, passing through a confusing 6 way intersection.

Then you can either cross broadway at 158th to the uptown side and then cross again one block north  as the signs will tell you OR just ride one block north on the west sidewalk to Fort Washington. Everyone rides the sidewalk now. 

There are no bike lanes until you get to fort washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I travel that route everyday, the only way it works is because there's not that many others that do it. This is going to be chaos.</p>
<p>You can either go up/down the zig zag ramp, contesting with everyone else on that ramp or just take the on/off ramp to the Henry Hudson up to 158th and go onto the greenway at 157. Then you have a recently paved but very steep hill to go up to/down from Broadway, passing through a confusing 6 way intersection.</p>
<p>Then you can either cross broadway at 158th to the uptown side and then cross again one block north  as the signs will tell you OR just ride one block north on the west sidewalk to Fort Washington. Everyone rides the sidewalk now. </p>
<p>There are no bike lanes until you get to fort washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58118</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58118</guid>
		<description>actually, that access point has two ramps - one on road and another off road.  the off road is a series of switchbacks which seems to have been modified to reduce the grade.  both options are a piece of cake compared to the hill just before 181.

i think the stair access you are considering is at 156th st.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, that access point has two ramps - one on road and another off road.  the off road is a series of switchbacks which seems to have been modified to reduce the grade.  both options are a piece of cake compared to the hill just before 181.</p>
<p>i think the stair access you are considering is at 156th st.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58117</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58117</guid>
		<description>I was wondering about that, as I hadn&#039;t even known one could access the pathway at 158th. Thanks for the warning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering about that, as I hadn't even known one could access the pathway at 158th. Thanks for the warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt H</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/27/another-interruption-planned-for-hudson-greenway/comment-page-1/#comment-58114</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4833#comment-58114</guid>
		<description>Ewww. The access to Riverside Park North at 158th street is long, stairway-happy, and rather isolated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewww. The access to Riverside Park North at 158th street is long, stairway-happy, and rather isolated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
