<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vision Zero NYC: Ending the Body Count</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jessica G</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-58700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-58700</guid>
		<description>I would just like to say is that there must be something fishy going on in the DOT. I live in midwood that seems to be sprouting street lights faster than the lawns grow weeds. Now I recently inquired as to why my block was getting a light and was told that based on a study which i never saw and never will see my block required a light. Now being that there are hardly cars passing by and the school only causes traffic twice a day and there have been no fatalities for at least 20 years I just don&#039;t see why we need a light and streets that have been proven dangerous can&#039;t seem to get a light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to say is that there must be something fishy going on in the DOT. I live in midwood that seems to be sprouting street lights faster than the lawns grow weeds. Now I recently inquired as to why my block was getting a light and was told that based on a study which i never saw and never will see my block required a light. Now being that there are hardly cars passing by and the school only causes traffic twice a day and there have been no fatalities for at least 20 years I just don't see why we need a light and streets that have been proven dangerous can't seem to get a light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-58005</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-58005</guid>
		<description>Vision Zero will save lives, enable much better transit systems, greatly improve local environments along with business, and be a shining example of high-quality multi-benefit eco-design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vision Zero will save lives, enable much better transit systems, greatly improve local environments along with business, and be a shining example of high-quality multi-benefit eco-design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57973</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57973</guid>
		<description>&quot;if everyone stayed in their assigned space and followed the rules, things would be safer, no?&quot;

We&#039;ll never know, since the conditions of the hypothesis are impossible to satisfy. What we do know is that compliance in NYC is terrible among all modes of street users, resulting in gridlock for automobiles and death, injury, and frustration for everyone else. Even if compliance could be made perfect, by magic, I have my doubts that things would be so great for pedestrians and cyclists (or even cars) given our present streets and statues. We have to move forward with the recognition that those things are fluid, that it is our right and even responsibility as a civilization to think about how to make them better.

And so it is that people who prefer the status quo (who are comfortable with their current set of privileges) will focus on compliance and law enforcement in order to dismiss new designs and programs that aim to fix problems at their source (poor compliance being merely a symptom). With congestion pricing the fake (and childish, really) alternative of $1000 double parking tickets was suggested to distract New Yorkers, but of course extreme penalties did not and SHOULD NOT come to pass, because in addition to not being London, Stockholm, or Paris, New York is not Pyongyang. Some people seem to be aiming for Mexico City, but I think we&#039;re starting to find a path through the wasteland of automotive failure. Parts of it will be inspired by successes in the EU and elsewhere, and parts of it will be of our own invention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"if everyone stayed in their assigned space and followed the rules, things would be safer, no?"</p>
<p>We'll never know, since the conditions of the hypothesis are impossible to satisfy. What we do know is that compliance in NYC is terrible among all modes of street users, resulting in gridlock for automobiles and death, injury, and frustration for everyone else. Even if compliance could be made perfect, by magic, I have my doubts that things would be so great for pedestrians and cyclists (or even cars) given our present streets and statues. We have to move forward with the recognition that those things are fluid, that it is our right and even responsibility as a civilization to think about how to make them better.</p>
<p>And so it is that people who prefer the status quo (who are comfortable with their current set of privileges) will focus on compliance and law enforcement in order to dismiss new designs and programs that aim to fix problems at their source (poor compliance being merely a symptom). With congestion pricing the fake (and childish, really) alternative of $1000 double parking tickets was suggested to distract New Yorkers, but of course extreme penalties did not and SHOULD NOT come to pass, because in addition to not being London, Stockholm, or Paris, New York is not Pyongyang. Some people seem to be aiming for Mexico City, but I think we're starting to find a path through the wasteland of automotive failure. Parts of it will be inspired by successes in the EU and elsewhere, and parts of it will be of our own invention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57951</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57951</guid>
		<description>While I agree with Greg, pedestrians also bear some respsonsibility. As a daily cyclist, I don&#039;t know why peds stand in the street, far from the sidewalk, 2 inches from cars and start walking the second they are able. when I&#039;m cylcing pedestrians move in as close as possible leaving only inches for me to pass which can seem somewhat agressive.
don&#039;t get me started on jaywalking or joggers in the street whether they are running the right or wrong way. if everyone stayed in their assigned space and followed the rules, things would be safer, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with Greg, pedestrians also bear some respsonsibility. As a daily cyclist, I don't know why peds stand in the street, far from the sidewalk, 2 inches from cars and start walking the second they are able. when I'm cylcing pedestrians move in as close as possible leaving only inches for me to pass which can seem somewhat agressive.<br />
don't get me started on jaywalking or joggers in the street whether they are running the right or wrong way. if everyone stayed in their assigned space and followed the rules, things would be safer, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57944</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57944</guid>
		<description>Vision Zero NYC is right on except that targeting 2020 seems to be a long time.  

A very aggressive local initiative will not only save a lot of lives but be crucial to a major transformation for New York City to meet the demands of modern civilization and lead the way in eradicating a key part of the structural violence of antiquated urban design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vision Zero NYC is right on except that targeting 2020 seems to be a long time.  </p>
<p>A very aggressive local initiative will not only save a lot of lives but be crucial to a major transformation for New York City to meet the demands of modern civilization and lead the way in eradicating a key part of the structural violence of antiquated urban design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57936</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57936</guid>
		<description>H&#039;mm, yes, seems the point of Vision Zero elsewhere is that those countries have achieved a rough national consensus --- as reflected by their legislatures --- that reducing road deaths is more important than moving motorists. Without that consensus, as reflected by legislative action, it is harder for the road agencies to redesign roads for safety. In other words, Vision Zero probably works a lot better coming outside from a legislature than from inside a road agency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H'mm, yes, seems the point of Vision Zero elsewhere is that those countries have achieved a rough national consensus --- as reflected by their legislatures --- that reducing road deaths is more important than moving motorists. Without that consensus, as reflected by legislative action, it is harder for the road agencies to redesign roads for safety. In other words, Vision Zero probably works a lot better coming outside from a legislature than from inside a road agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57934</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57934</guid>
		<description>heh... i can&#039;t believe it took a full 24 hours until someone with Greg&#039;s perspicacity showed up.

Indeed, let&#039;s have auto DRIVERS show some responsibility!!  after all, they sign a piece of paper that basically says they know and will obey the road rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh... i can't believe it took a full 24 hours until someone with Greg's perspicacity showed up.</p>
<p>Indeed, let's have auto DRIVERS show some responsibility!!  after all, they sign a piece of paper that basically says they know and will obey the road rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57933</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57933</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The only real hope for safety improvements is to focus on behavior modification.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
We&#039;d all love to see the plan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The only real hope for safety improvements is to focus on behavior modification.</p></blockquote>
<p>We'd all love to see the plan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BernardMarx</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57932</link>
		<dc:creator>BernardMarx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57932</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are other ways, besides just better law enforcement, to slow drivers down. Speed bumps, traffic circles in place of regular intersections, and narrower roadways come to mind. I am not a traffic planner, and I&#039;m sure each of these has plusses and minuses, but the point is that, even without NYPD cooperation, DOT could be redesigning roads to make them safer for everyone--pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists.&quot;

DOT&#039;s budget is small and shrinking. The idea that we can design our way to safety is utopian.  We are in a built environment that is not going to see anything other than marginal physical improvements.  The current DOT regime has lots of good ideas and is very good at generating PR about these ideas, but the reality is that they don&#039;t have much impact at their current scale.  The only real hope for safety improvements is to focus on behavior modification.

&quot;what is amazing is that the recent reduction in NYC has occurred with a piecemeal approach. only a relative handful of dangerous streets and intersections have seen improvements. imagine what a vision zero approach and the systematic application of ped safety measures (like LPIs for example) could accomplish.&quot;

What&#039;s amazing is that people actually believe that the long-term (downward) trends (both locally and nationally) in accident and fatality rates are  actually caused by these piecemeal changes.  Safer cars, better trauma medicine, and major efforts to reduced drunk driving are much more significant factors.

&quot;crash numbers, after years of decline, have leveled off. that is why we need a new approach&quot;  First, there has been one year of leveling off of some categories of crashes, which does not a trend make.   Second, the population has been increasing continuously, as has the number of people driving in NYC, so in fact rates of crashes and fatality are continuing to drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"There are other ways, besides just better law enforcement, to slow drivers down. Speed bumps, traffic circles in place of regular intersections, and narrower roadways come to mind. I am not a traffic planner, and I'm sure each of these has plusses and minuses, but the point is that, even without NYPD cooperation, DOT could be redesigning roads to make them safer for everyone--pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists."</p>
<p>DOT's budget is small and shrinking. The idea that we can design our way to safety is utopian.  We are in a built environment that is not going to see anything other than marginal physical improvements.  The current DOT regime has lots of good ideas and is very good at generating PR about these ideas, but the reality is that they don't have much impact at their current scale.  The only real hope for safety improvements is to focus on behavior modification.</p>
<p>"what is amazing is that the recent reduction in NYC has occurred with a piecemeal approach. only a relative handful of dangerous streets and intersections have seen improvements. imagine what a vision zero approach and the systematic application of ped safety measures (like LPIs for example) could accomplish."</p>
<p>What's amazing is that people actually believe that the long-term (downward) trends (both locally and nationally) in accident and fatality rates are  actually caused by these piecemeal changes.  Safer cars, better trauma medicine, and major efforts to reduced drunk driving are much more significant factors.</p>
<p>"crash numbers, after years of decline, have leveled off. that is why we need a new approach"  First, there has been one year of leveling off of some categories of crashes, which does not a trend make.   Second, the population has been increasing continuously, as has the number of people driving in NYC, so in fact rates of crashes and fatality are continuing to drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily J.</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57924</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57924</guid>
		<description>Great point, Greg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, Greg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57922</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57922</guid>
		<description>I find it rather perverse that the sign in the photo is addressed at pedestrians. Shouldn&#039;t it be addressed to motorists, and read: 

&quot;A pedestrian was killed crossing here, slow the fuck down.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it rather perverse that the sign in the photo is addressed at pedestrians. Shouldn't it be addressed to motorists, and read: </p>
<p>"A pedestrian was killed crossing here, slow the fuck down."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parochial Punque</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57913</link>
		<dc:creator>Parochial Punque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57913</guid>
		<description>greener grass,

we&#039;re not saying &quot;Sweden good, NYC bad&quot;  we&#039;re saying that accepting several score deaths and injuries a year as business-as-usual is bad.   and sure, sweden might have something to learn from NYC too.   

what is amazing is that the recent reduction in NYC has occurred with a piecemeal approach.  only a relative handful of dangerous streets and intersections have seen improvements.  imagine what a vision zero approach and the systematic application of ped safety measures (like LPIs for example) could accomplish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greener grass,</p>
<p>we're not saying "Sweden good, NYC bad"  we're saying that accepting several score deaths and injuries a year as business-as-usual is bad.   and sure, sweden might have something to learn from NYC too.   </p>
<p>what is amazing is that the recent reduction in NYC has occurred with a piecemeal approach.  only a relative handful of dangerous streets and intersections have seen improvements.  imagine what a vision zero approach and the systematic application of ped safety measures (like LPIs for example) could accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57909</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57909</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth noting that Vision Zero in Sweden and Denmark is a statement of values by the national legislatures, in which they charge the road agencies and car builders to take more responsibility for reducing crashes. Our problem is almost the opposite. Our state legislature is far behind our local road agency (NYC DOT) and even our police on road safety issues. The legislature opposes red light and speed enforcement cameras, tougher driver testing and education standards, tougher penalties and greater accountability for drivers who kill and injure. The power of Vision Zero is one of the social and political consensus which the state or national legislature represent. The mayor and City Council could still adopt Vision Zero, but they do not control many of the laws and regulations needed for effective safety education and enforcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's worth noting that Vision Zero in Sweden and Denmark is a statement of values by the national legislatures, in which they charge the road agencies and car builders to take more responsibility for reducing crashes. Our problem is almost the opposite. Our state legislature is far behind our local road agency (NYC DOT) and even our police on road safety issues. The legislature opposes red light and speed enforcement cameras, tougher driver testing and education standards, tougher penalties and greater accountability for drivers who kill and injure. The power of Vision Zero is one of the social and political consensus which the state or national legislature represent. The mayor and City Council could still adopt Vision Zero, but they do not control many of the laws and regulations needed for effective safety education and enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greener Grass</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57908</link>
		<dc:creator>Greener Grass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57908</guid>
		<description>I said nothing about a unique context, and don&#039;t disagree that adopting strong goals and a safety philosophy with a very clear public message are advantageous for NYC.  

I was simply pointing out that public advocacy with a credibility gap big enough to drive a Volvo through doesn&#039;t do anyone any good.  Claiming Sweden Good, NYC Bad without any supporting information or research is just that.  

Mark, the fatality picture in NYC has and continues to be very well chronicled.  You can even look it up on Streetsblog.  

Anyway, a quick internet search yields this comparison: 

2000-2004 road deaths decline in Sweden: -19%
2000-2004 road deaths decline in NYC:  -28%

Sure, any segment of time like this is subject to variations and change over the long run, etc., but it&#039;s pretty clear that Vision Zero hasn&#039;t led to real world safety gains that in any way put NYC to shame. 

So, Punk, what &quot;global best practice&quot; are you actually talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said nothing about a unique context, and don't disagree that adopting strong goals and a safety philosophy with a very clear public message are advantageous for NYC.  </p>
<p>I was simply pointing out that public advocacy with a credibility gap big enough to drive a Volvo through doesn't do anyone any good.  Claiming Sweden Good, NYC Bad without any supporting information or research is just that.  </p>
<p>Mark, the fatality picture in NYC has and continues to be very well chronicled.  You can even look it up on Streetsblog.  </p>
<p>Anyway, a quick internet search yields this comparison: </p>
<p>2000-2004 road deaths decline in Sweden: -19%<br />
2000-2004 road deaths decline in NYC:  -28%</p>
<p>Sure, any segment of time like this is subject to variations and change over the long run, etc., but it's pretty clear that Vision Zero hasn't led to real world safety gains that in any way put NYC to shame. </p>
<p>So, Punk, what "global best practice" are you actually talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parochial Punk</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57902</link>
		<dc:creator>Parochial Punk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57902</guid>
		<description>Yo Greener Grass:

crash numbers, after years of decline, have leveled off.  that is why we need a new approach. 


if T.A. and the City listened to those who have decried global best practice because NYC is a such a &quot;unique context&quot; then we would would not have summer streets, BRT, protected bike lanes, parking reforms, and a host of other great stuff that has been successfully adapted and adopted of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Greener Grass:</p>
<p>crash numbers, after years of decline, have leveled off.  that is why we need a new approach. </p>
<p>if T.A. and the City listened to those who have decried global best practice because NYC is a such a "unique context" then we would would not have summer streets, BRT, protected bike lanes, parking reforms, and a host of other great stuff that has been successfully adapted and adopted of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily J.</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57901</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57901</guid>
		<description>There are other ways, besides just better law enforcement, to slow drivers down.  Speed bumps, traffic circles in place of regular intersections, and narrower roadways come to mind.  I am not a traffic planner, and I&#039;m sure each of these has plusses and minuses, but the point is that, even without NYPD cooperation, DOT could be redesigning roads to make them safer for everyone--pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other ways, besides just better law enforcement, to slow drivers down.  Speed bumps, traffic circles in place of regular intersections, and narrower roadways come to mind.  I am not a traffic planner, and I'm sure each of these has plusses and minuses, but the point is that, even without NYPD cooperation, DOT could be redesigning roads to make them safer for everyone--pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdr</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57899</link>
		<dc:creator>fdr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57899</guid>
		<description>&quot;All these things can be done. It just depends how much we&#039;re willing to spend, how much freedom we&#039;re willing to give up, and basically how much we, as a society, really want it.&quot;
You&#039;re right, Andy - we as a society are not ready to spend, or give up freedom, nor do we &quot;really want&quot; to do the radical things you suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"All these things can be done. It just depends how much we're willing to spend, how much freedom we're willing to give up, and basically how much we, as a society, really want it."<br />
You're right, Andy - we as a society are not ready to spend, or give up freedom, nor do we "really want" to do the radical things you suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greener Grass</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57894</link>
		<dc:creator>Greener Grass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57894</guid>
		<description>Mark, the fatality situation in NYC has been and continues to be heavily chronicled.  You can even look it up here.  But since facts aren&#039;t the main currency here in the comment section, here you go: 

&quot;The Mayor also released final 2007 traffic fatality data today showing that traffic fatalities in New York City dropped to the lowest level since records started being kept in 1910: 271 traffic fatalities citywide, down more than 30% since 2001. There were also an all-time low 136 pedestrian deaths last year-13% fewer than previous lows in both 2004 and 2005.&quot; 

http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/menuitem.c0935b9a57bb4ef3daf2f1c701c789a0/index.jsp?pageID=mayor_press_release&amp;catID=1194&amp;doc_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyc.gov%2Fhtml%2Fom%2Fhtml%2F2008a%2Fpr033-08.html&amp;cc=unused1978&amp;rc=1194&amp;ndi=1

http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/stratplan_safety.pdf

http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/01/18/bloomberg-touches-on-safe-streets-pricing-in-state-of-the-city/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, the fatality situation in NYC has been and continues to be heavily chronicled.  You can even look it up here.  But since facts aren't the main currency here in the comment section, here you go: </p>
<p>"The Mayor also released final 2007 traffic fatality data today showing that traffic fatalities in New York City dropped to the lowest level since records started being kept in 1910: 271 traffic fatalities citywide, down more than 30% since 2001. There were also an all-time low 136 pedestrian deaths last year-13% fewer than previous lows in both 2004 and 2005." </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/menuitem.c0935b9a57bb4ef3daf2f1c701c789a0/index.jsp?pageID=mayor_press_release&amp;catID=1194&amp;doc_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyc.gov%2Fhtml%2Fom%2Fhtml%2F2008a%2Fpr033-08.html&amp;cc=unused1978&amp;rc=1194&amp;ndi=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/menuitem.c0935b9a57bb4ef3daf2f1c701c789a0/index.jsp?pageID=mayor_press_release&amp;catID=1194&amp;doc_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyc.gov%2Fhtml%2Fom%2Fhtml%2F2008a%2Fpr033-08.html&amp;cc=unused1978&amp;rc=1194&amp;ndi=1</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/stratplan_safety.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/stratplan_safety.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/01/18/bloomberg-touches-on-safe-streets-pricing-in-state-of-the-city/" rel="nofollow">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/01/18/bloomberg-touches-on-safe-streets-pricing-in-state-of-the-city/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shishi</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57893</link>
		<dc:creator>shishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57893</guid>
		<description>You can design your way for a better city very easily. When all designs start and prioritize the pedestrian first, I think we would all be amazed at the results. This does not mean it will be easy, but with 2-30 years of the proper planning this might just be the greatest walkable city ever. It is sad that the shared streets design are just now starting to get attention and implemented in the US. We need more of these everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can design your way for a better city very easily. When all designs start and prioritize the pedestrian first, I think we would all be amazed at the results. This does not mean it will be easy, but with 2-30 years of the proper planning this might just be the greatest walkable city ever. It is sad that the shared streets design are just now starting to get attention and implemented in the US. We need more of these everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/10/21/vision-zero-nyc-ending-the-body-count/comment-page-1/#comment-57892</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/?p=4796#comment-57892</guid>
		<description>&quot;When it comes to road safety, crashes should be viewed as mistakes in street design rather than unavoidable accidents.&quot;

In our litigious American society, there is not enough money in all the city&#039;s coffers to address the liability implications of that statement. It would simply bankrupt the city government overnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"When it comes to road safety, crashes should be viewed as mistakes in street design rather than unavoidable accidents."</p>
<p>In our litigious American society, there is not enough money in all the city's coffers to address the liability implications of that statement. It would simply bankrupt the city government overnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
