<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T.A.: Car-Free Central Park Would Ease Neighborhood Congestion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:01:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SlowButSteady</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-53707</link>
		<dc:creator>SlowButSteady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-53707</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing so much behavior in Central Park that looks wrong that I&#039;m actually wondering if I&#039;m confused about the rules.  I wrote up a bunch of questions - any help would be greatly appreciated:

1 - who, besides Parks vehicles, can drive on the park drive during the times that it is off limits to MVs??  I go around 10am and I often see cars between 10 and 10:30 am.  Most are livery cabs, doing more than 25 mph, and I&#039;ve seen them go right by squad cars while the cops do nothing.

2 - During the hours that MVs are permitted on the park drives, or between E. 59th and E. 72nd where they are always permitted, is the bike lane mandatory for cyclists?  A cop yelled at me when I was in the left MV lane, because the combined jogging/cycling lane was so crowded.

3 - Are horse&amp;buggies allowed in the jogging/cycling lane?  Pedicabs?  I&#039;ve seen pedicabs between E. 59th and E. 72nd in the combined joggling/cycling lane, and it&#039;s not easy to pass them if there&#039;s two lanes of MV traffic.

4 - Is the &quot;counter clockwise rule&quot; a hard and fast rule, or a guideline?  Are runners and cyclists going clockwise required to yield? Sometimes they stare me down like they&#039;re saying &quot;make my day&quot;.

I think some problems arise because many people are ignorant of the rules. People going clockwise may have no idea they&#039;re not supposed to. There are signs on the reservoir track, why not on the Park drive?

Thanks guys for helping out a novice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm seeing so much behavior in Central Park that looks wrong that I'm actually wondering if I'm confused about the rules.  I wrote up a bunch of questions - any help would be greatly appreciated:</p>
<p>1 - who, besides Parks vehicles, can drive on the park drive during the times that it is off limits to MVs??  I go around 10am and I often see cars between 10 and 10:30 am.  Most are livery cabs, doing more than 25 mph, and I've seen them go right by squad cars while the cops do nothing.</p>
<p>2 - During the hours that MVs are permitted on the park drives, or between E. 59th and E. 72nd where they are always permitted, is the bike lane mandatory for cyclists?  A cop yelled at me when I was in the left MV lane, because the combined jogging/cycling lane was so crowded.</p>
<p>3 - Are horse&amp;buggies allowed in the jogging/cycling lane?  Pedicabs?  I've seen pedicabs between E. 59th and E. 72nd in the combined joggling/cycling lane, and it's not easy to pass them if there's two lanes of MV traffic.</p>
<p>4 - Is the "counter clockwise rule" a hard and fast rule, or a guideline?  Are runners and cyclists going clockwise required to yield? Sometimes they stare me down like they're saying "make my day".</p>
<p>I think some problems arise because many people are ignorant of the rules. People going clockwise may have no idea they're not supposed to. There are signs on the reservoir track, why not on the Park drive?</p>
<p>Thanks guys for helping out a novice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael1</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51912</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51912</guid>
		<description>Central Park should be banned to all cars except certain NYPD and DPR cars. However, the DOT should consider seriously how Park Drive is reconfigured. If you don&#039;t get hit by a car, you&#039;ll get hit by a bike. Chances are that when the cars disappear, Park Drive will be configured to better suite cyclists, however their speed should not be ignored. Personally, I think yield signs with plastic traffic bollards will help slow cyclists down at certain crosswalks in the Park. Also, the redesign should reflect lanes that are suitable for both slow and fast cyclists, since there are many bike clubs that use this thoroughfare for their bikeathons and all that. First comes first, cars should be prohibited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Central Park should be banned to all cars except certain NYPD and DPR cars. However, the DOT should consider seriously how Park Drive is reconfigured. If you don't get hit by a car, you'll get hit by a bike. Chances are that when the cars disappear, Park Drive will be configured to better suite cyclists, however their speed should not be ignored. Personally, I think yield signs with plastic traffic bollards will help slow cyclists down at certain crosswalks in the Park. Also, the redesign should reflect lanes that are suitable for both slow and fast cyclists, since there are many bike clubs that use this thoroughfare for their bikeathons and all that. First comes first, cars should be prohibited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51884</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51884</guid>
		<description>And, out of most, if not all of the city also.  

Just that the powers that be have a hard time (dare I say) thinking big enough to make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, out of most, if not all of the city also.  </p>
<p>Just that the powers that be have a hard time (dare I say) thinking big enough to make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51865</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51865</guid>
		<description>I just want the cars out the park--period!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want the cars out the park--period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51859</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51859</guid>
		<description>It just may be possible to set the &quot;tone&quot; that horn honking and reckless endangerment by cars in our parks be considered much more serious – not to mention antisocial -- offenses.

This could be done by signage affirming the laws by DOT.  And, by the Parks Department affirming the nature of parks and cautioning drivers to slow down if they see children even playing by the side of the road like “Caution!  Children at Play.”

Compliance with a law does not necessarily have to depend on heavy enforcement such as with &quot;scoop the poop,&quot; and optimally, depends on the best in people.  

People are less likely to honk or honk excessively on a beautiful tree lined residential street.  It should be possible to set the same tone for parks and with the extra effort to make drivers aware of this since they are isolated in their cars.

Dare we invite them for a stroll?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just may be possible to set the "tone" that horn honking and reckless endangerment by cars in our parks be considered much more serious – not to mention antisocial -- offenses.</p>
<p>This could be done by signage affirming the laws by DOT.  And, by the Parks Department affirming the nature of parks and cautioning drivers to slow down if they see children even playing by the side of the road like “Caution!  Children at Play.”</p>
<p>Compliance with a law does not necessarily have to depend on heavy enforcement such as with "scoop the poop," and optimally, depends on the best in people.  </p>
<p>People are less likely to honk or honk excessively on a beautiful tree lined residential street.  It should be possible to set the same tone for parks and with the extra effort to make drivers aware of this since they are isolated in their cars.</p>
<p>Dare we invite them for a stroll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51849</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51849</guid>
		<description>I know the horn honking law well, and I agree with you.  I was just pointing out how ridiculously little the law is &quot;enforced&quot; in the city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the horn honking law well, and I agree with you.  I was just pointing out how ridiculously little the law is "enforced" in the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51839</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51839</guid>
		<description>#16 Spud Spudly, Drivers mistakenly think they have the right to direct traffic with their horns.  They do not and the no-honking signs state this explicitly.  And, they definitely do not have the right to harass which they do.

The only permission they have to use their horns is in the case of an emergency as a warning and to hopefully prevent a catastrophe.  If a child or someone else using the park mistakenly goes into the park road -- which is natural during play and park use -- and is in danger of being hit then that would constitute an emergency.

Though, this type of situation does not seem justifiable.  When a car or truck moves in the Union Square Farmers Market they “creep” along and there is always at least one individual to assist to make sure no one is hurt.  

The same kind of care and consideration should be taken in our parks, even though cars are allowed to move faster than a creep and perhaps, additional signs should posted for car drivers to be considerate, drive safely, and slow down when their are other people in the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#16 Spud Spudly, Drivers mistakenly think they have the right to direct traffic with their horns.  They do not and the no-honking signs state this explicitly.  And, they definitely do not have the right to harass which they do.</p>
<p>The only permission they have to use their horns is in the case of an emergency as a warning and to hopefully prevent a catastrophe.  If a child or someone else using the park mistakenly goes into the park road -- which is natural during play and park use -- and is in danger of being hit then that would constitute an emergency.</p>
<p>Though, this type of situation does not seem justifiable.  When a car or truck moves in the Union Square Farmers Market they “creep” along and there is always at least one individual to assist to make sure no one is hurt.  </p>
<p>The same kind of care and consideration should be taken in our parks, even though cars are allowed to move faster than a creep and perhaps, additional signs should posted for car drivers to be considerate, drive safely, and slow down when their are other people in the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51821</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51821</guid>
		<description>Horn honking signs are nice -- enforcement&#039;s another matter.  The total number of violations issued for horn honking citywide in fiscal year 2007 was 23.  If Parks could issue the tickets that might go up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horn honking signs are nice -- enforcement's another matter.  The total number of violations issued for horn honking citywide in fiscal year 2007 was 23.  If Parks could issue the tickets that might go up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51816</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51816</guid>
		<description>There should be &quot;no honking&quot; signs with the large fines on the park roads same as on city streets.  

In addition to the NYPD, parks enforcement people should be empowered to issue tickets, and ultimately, ban those drivers with multiple offenses.

Those individuals endangering others by driving recklessly, honking, and tailgating others using the park roads should be banned immediately and for life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be "no honking" signs with the large fines on the park roads same as on city streets.  </p>
<p>In addition to the NYPD, parks enforcement people should be empowered to issue tickets, and ultimately, ban those drivers with multiple offenses.</p>
<p>Those individuals endangering others by driving recklessly, honking, and tailgating others using the park roads should be banned immediately and for life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51800</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51800</guid>
		<description>JF, you asked the same question I wanted to ask, including Prospect Park as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JF, you asked the same question I wanted to ask, including Prospect Park as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51799</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51799</guid>
		<description>Hi - Does any one know CP Conservancy&#039;s role in this? I havent seen them pushing against cars. Surely they should be advocating on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi - Does any one know CP Conservancy's role in this? I havent seen them pushing against cars. Surely they should be advocating on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51795</link>
		<dc:creator>JF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51795</guid>
		<description>This is not coming from either Bloomberg or Sadik-Khan, right?  I&#039;m guessing that they&#039;d probably prefer to close the drive, but are keeping it open so as not to piss off some important allies.

Do we know who these allies are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not coming from either Bloomberg or Sadik-Khan, right?  I'm guessing that they'd probably prefer to close the drive, but are keeping it open so as not to piss off some important allies.</p>
<p>Do we know who these allies are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanis</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51794</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51794</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to think legal protests and civil disobedience might force the city&#039;s hand. I went on the Central Park traffic calming ride last month--what about a massive traffic-calming ride or having a mass of pedestrians and cyclists take over the loop or block the entrances?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm starting to think legal protests and civil disobedience might force the city's hand. I went on the Central Park traffic calming ride last month--what about a massive traffic-calming ride or having a mass of pedestrians and cyclists take over the loop or block the entrances?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51788</link>
		<dc:creator>d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51788</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d imagine a similar study would show that the major intersections around Prospect Park (Parkside, GAP, Park Circle, etc.) are similarly congested when the park is open to traffic.  

Cars need to be banned from both parks IMMEDIATELY.  It&#039;s rank prejudice to not have safe, clean places for people who can not afford to leave the city.  The parks are the city&#039;s backyards.  Would anyone want cars running through their property?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd imagine a similar study would show that the major intersections around Prospect Park (Parkside, GAP, Park Circle, etc.) are similarly congested when the park is open to traffic.  </p>
<p>Cars need to be banned from both parks IMMEDIATELY.  It's rank prejudice to not have safe, clean places for people who can not afford to leave the city.  The parks are the city's backyards.  Would anyone want cars running through their property?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51784</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51784</guid>
		<description>Get the cars out of the park.  Also, let&#039;s get the people on wheels of all types who use the park roads to stop at the damned red lights, weekends included.  Getting across the road with a two-year-old even in a marked crosswalk at a red light is an adventure in timing and luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get the cars out of the park.  Also, let's get the people on wheels of all types who use the park roads to stop at the damned red lights, weekends included.  Getting across the road with a two-year-old even in a marked crosswalk at a red light is an adventure in timing and luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51776</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51776</guid>
		<description>In Central Park and Prospect Park, there are X number of autos using two lanes, and at any given time there&#039;s double that number of walkers, runners, inline skaters and cyclists squeezed into one lane on the left. 
The poor runners are consigned to a lane that slopes into the curb for drainage. So rather than damage their bodies training on an uneven surface, many of them run in the biker&#039;s lane, which just creates more conflict and danger for all.
And it never fails that if any cyclist or skater or runner uses an inch of the driving lane, they get honked at by drivers who imagine their journey is somehow impeded. So the quietude of the city&#039;s premier parks is interrupted by drivers who are using the park as a thruway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Central Park and Prospect Park, there are X number of autos using two lanes, and at any given time there's double that number of walkers, runners, inline skaters and cyclists squeezed into one lane on the left.<br />
The poor runners are consigned to a lane that slopes into the curb for drainage. So rather than damage their bodies training on an uneven surface, many of them run in the biker's lane, which just creates more conflict and danger for all.<br />
And it never fails that if any cyclist or skater or runner uses an inch of the driving lane, they get honked at by drivers who imagine their journey is somehow impeded. So the quietude of the city's premier parks is interrupted by drivers who are using the park as a thruway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BicyclesOnly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51769</link>
		<dc:creator>BicyclesOnly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51769</guid>
		<description>Moreover, cars on the loop  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.transalt.org/newsroom/releases/168&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;routinely exceed the 25 MPH speed limit.&lt;/a&gt;  If ever there was a roadway with &quot;excess capacity&quot; in need of a &quot;road diet,&quot; it is the Central Park Loop.  Not to mention the fact that there are far more bicyclists and pedestrians clamoring for use of that excess cpacity than there are motorists.  The allocation of space on the loop is absurd no matter how you look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moreover, cars on the loop  <a href="http://www.transalt.org/newsroom/releases/168" rel="nofollow">routinely exceed the 25 MPH speed limit.</a>  If ever there was a roadway with "excess capacity" in need of a "road diet," it is the Central Park Loop.  Not to mention the fact that there are far more bicyclists and pedestrians clamoring for use of that excess cpacity than there are motorists.  The allocation of space on the loop is absurd no matter how you look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51766</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51766</guid>
		<description>Thanks all. The PDF link should be fixed now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all. The PDF link should be fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transalt.org</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51765</link>
		<dc:creator>transalt.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51765</guid>
		<description>The study is available here:

http://www.transalt.org/files/newsroom/reports/harlem_traffic_magnet.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The study is available here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.transalt.org/files/newsroom/reports/harlem_traffic_magnet.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.transalt.org/files/newsroom/reports/harlem_traffic_magnet.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-51764</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/06/12/ta-car-free-central-park-would-ease-neighborhood-congestion/#comment-51764</guid>
		<description>40% of the motorists originate in Harlem. Odds are good that 90% of these folks are within a ten minute walk of the subway and 99% within a 5 minute walk of a bus or subway. Odds are also good that a majority of the Harlem drivers work for the City of New York.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40% of the motorists originate in Harlem. Odds are good that 90% of these folks are within a ten minute walk of the subway and 99% within a 5 minute walk of a bus or subway. Odds are also good that a majority of the Harlem drivers work for the City of New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
