<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Dismisses Gas Tax &#8220;Gimmick&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BicyclesOnly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-51464</link>
		<author>BicyclesOnly</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-51464</guid>
		<description>What's Obama doing this weekend?  &lt;a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/the-long-goodbye/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Biking&lt;/a&gt;:

“We’ve been going at a pretty fast clip. I intend to take the weekend off and I’m going to take my wife out on a date. I hope to go on a bike ride with my kids,” Mr. Obama said."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's Obama doing this weekend?  <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/the-long-goodbye/" rel="nofollow">Biking</a>:</p>
<p>“We’ve been going at a pretty fast clip. I intend to take the weekend off and I’m going to take my wife out on a date. I hope to go on a bike ride with my kids,” Mr. Obama said."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DowntownNewHaven</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49847</link>
		<author>DowntownNewHaven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49847</guid>
		<description>The gas tax probably needs to be raised from $0.18 cents per gallon to $18.00 per gallon. That's the true social and economic cost of the stuff. Why is America so far behind?

Anyhow, I know many people who in the past two weeks have switched their affiliations from Clinton to Obama because of this single issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gas tax probably needs to be raised from $0.18 cents per gallon to $18.00 per gallon. That's the true social and economic cost of the stuff. Why is America so far behind?</p>
<p>Anyhow, I know many people who in the past two weeks have switched their affiliations from Clinton to Obama because of this single issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49844</link>
		<author>Cap'n Transit</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49844</guid>
		<description>Sorry, William, socialist dreamland is now occupied by the trucking industry:

http://capntransit.blogspot.com/2008/04/truckers-call-for-cap-on-fuel-prices.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, William, socialist dreamland is now occupied by the trucking industry:</p>
<p><a href="http://capntransit.blogspot.com/2008/04/truckers-call-for-cap-on-fuel-prices.html" rel="nofollow">http://capntransit.blogspot.com/2008/04/truckers-call-for-cap-on-fuel-prices.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49791</link>
		<author>Doc Barnett</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49791</guid>
		<description>I have to point out that caps-lock was engaged at the &lt;i&gt;second&lt;/i&gt; letter. Interesting technique.

I wonder if highway workers get good health care? They certainly need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to point out that caps-lock was engaged at the <i>second</i> letter. Interesting technique.</p>
<p>I wonder if highway workers get good health care? They certainly need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49785</link>
		<author>JF</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49785</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, that's a great argument, William: unsubstantiated claims of corruption, so let's not build any rail.  What do you propose instead, build more roads?  I'm sure there's &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; corruption there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, that's a great argument, William: unsubstantiated claims of corruption, so let's not build any rail.  What do you propose instead, build more roads?  I'm sure there's <i>no</i> corruption there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william j. leitold</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49780</link>
		<author>william j. leitold</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49780</guid>
		<description>lET'S TALK ABOUT THE OVERPRICED TRANSPORTATION UNION JOBS; WHAT IS THE TOTAL ANNUAL COMPENSATION OF THIS RAIL WORKER?  IN NYC WE'VEW GOT PEOPLE WHO PUNCH TICKETS ON THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD MAKING $150K PER YEAR AND THEY NEED A POLITICAL REFERAL TO GET THAT JOB.  SO RAIL GET VERY EXSPENSIVE VERY FAST ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU START INCLUDING OUT OF CONTROL PENSIONS WITH HEAVELY SUBISDIZED EARLY RETIRMENT WITH FULL HEALTHCARE.  AS FOR EXSPANDING OUTSIDE OF THE NORTHEAST, YOU'D HAVE TO BE NUTS OR A RERIREE WITH A VERY FLEXIBLE SCHEDULE TO TAKE A TRAIN FROM DC TO CHICAGO.  BUT ALL OF THIS WOULD GIVE THE POLITICAL CLASS A WHOLE LOT OF PATRONAGE, OH I FORGOT THAT'S WHAT THE CHICAGO DALY MACHINE RAN ON.  ISN'T CHICAGO MR. OBAMA'S HOME TOWN? WHAT A SURPRISE AND I THOUGHT HIM ABOVE THE USUAL POLITICS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lET'S TALK ABOUT THE OVERPRICED TRANSPORTATION UNION JOBS; WHAT IS THE TOTAL ANNUAL COMPENSATION OF THIS RAIL WORKER?  IN NYC WE'VEW GOT PEOPLE WHO PUNCH TICKETS ON THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD MAKING $150K PER YEAR AND THEY NEED A POLITICAL REFERAL TO GET THAT JOB.  SO RAIL GET VERY EXSPENSIVE VERY FAST ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU START INCLUDING OUT OF CONTROL PENSIONS WITH HEAVELY SUBISDIZED EARLY RETIRMENT WITH FULL HEALTHCARE.  AS FOR EXSPANDING OUTSIDE OF THE NORTHEAST, YOU'D HAVE TO BE NUTS OR A RERIREE WITH A VERY FLEXIBLE SCHEDULE TO TAKE A TRAIN FROM DC TO CHICAGO.  BUT ALL OF THIS WOULD GIVE THE POLITICAL CLASS A WHOLE LOT OF PATRONAGE, OH I FORGOT THAT'S WHAT THE CHICAGO DALY MACHINE RAN ON.  ISN'T CHICAGO MR. OBAMA'S HOME TOWN? WHAT A SURPRISE AND I THOUGHT HIM ABOVE THE USUAL POLITICS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49555</link>
		<author>Gary</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49555</guid>
		<description>I asked the Weiner staff to reconcile his call for a higher federal gas tax with his support for Clinton, and for his position on this ridiculous tax "holiday".

Still waiting for a substantive response.

Given that Weiner sandbagged CP with the promise of higher Federal gas taxes, he can not remain silent on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked the Weiner staff to reconcile his call for a higher federal gas tax with his support for Clinton, and for his position on this ridiculous tax "holiday".</p>
<p>Still waiting for a substantive response.</p>
<p>Given that Weiner sandbagged CP with the promise of higher Federal gas taxes, he can not remain silent on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niccolo Machiavelli</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49536</link>
		<author>Niccolo Machiavelli</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49536</guid>
		<description>Sorry Brothers and Sisters its even worse than what you guys say.  The gas tax also pays for mass transit, eliminating it will fulfill one of Weiner's jeremiads concerning the intentions of the Bush administration transportation policy and congestion pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Brothers and Sisters its even worse than what you guys say.  The gas tax also pays for mass transit, eliminating it will fulfill one of Weiner's jeremiads concerning the intentions of the Bush administration transportation policy and congestion pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49489</link>
		<author>Spud Spudly</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49489</guid>
		<description>Apparently Obama's proposing an even larger windfall tax on the oil companies:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#38;sid=aP_1wrIyt1Nc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Obama's proposing an even larger windfall tax on the oil companies:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aP_1wrIyt1Nc" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aP_1wrIyt1Nc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49488</link>
		<author>JF</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49488</guid>
		<description>By contrast, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/us/politics/29campaign.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Clinton would tax the oil companies&lt;/a&gt; to make up the lost revenue.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Mrs. Clinton said at a rally on Monday morning in Graham, N.C., that she would introduce legislation to impose a windfall-profits tax on oil companies and use the revenue to suspend the gasoline tax temporarily.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And of course the oil companies aren't going to raise their prices to make up for those taxes.  Here's a nickel for you to replace the one I just took out of your pocket.  Don't you want to vote for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By contrast, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/us/politics/29campaign.html" rel="nofollow">Clinton would tax the oil companies</a> to make up the lost revenue.</p>
<blockquote><p>Mrs. Clinton said at a rally on Monday morning in Graham, N.C., that she would introduce legislation to impose a windfall-profits tax on oil companies and use the revenue to suspend the gasoline tax temporarily.</p></blockquote>
<p>And of course the oil companies aren't going to raise their prices to make up for those taxes.  Here's a nickel for you to replace the one I just took out of your pocket.  Don't you want to vote for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49487</link>
		<author>JF</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49487</guid>
		<description>Sadly, Mark, the lower gas-tax revenue &lt;a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/15/892751.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;will not result in less money for roads&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain spokesman Brian Rogers emails First Read, "Sen. McCain believes that general revenue transfers should be made to offset the impact on the transportation fund."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fuck that.  I'm not having my general taxes subsidize some North Carolina drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, Mark, the lower gas-tax revenue <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/15/892751.aspx" rel="nofollow">will not result in less money for roads</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>McCain spokesman Brian Rogers emails First Read, "Sen. McCain believes that general revenue transfers should be made to offset the impact on the transportation fund."</p></blockquote>
<p>Fuck that.  I'm not having my general taxes subsidize some North Carolina drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49483</link>
		<author>Mark Walker</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49483</guid>
		<description>As a non-driver, I can view the gas-tax holiday only with glee. Gee, you mean one of the financial supports for highways is about to be kicked away? Broken axles? Lots and lots of new tolls to make up the difference? Bring it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a non-driver, I can view the gas-tax holiday only with glee. Gee, you mean one of the financial supports for highways is about to be kicked away? Broken axles? Lots and lots of new tolls to make up the difference? Bring it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Naparstek</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49480</link>
		<author>Aaron Naparstek</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49480</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If Obama does win the nomination, when the general election rolls around McCain's gas tax suspension would have been over!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If gas tax "holiday" comes to pass, I'd bet it'd be an endless summer. No one's going to move to bring the gas tax back in an election season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If Obama does win the nomination, when the general election rolls around McCain's gas tax suspension would have been over!</p></blockquote>
<p>If gas tax "holiday" comes to pass, I'd bet it'd be an endless summer. No one's going to move to bring the gas tax back in an election season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2Cents</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49479</link>
		<author>2Cents</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49479</guid>
		<description>Obama gets NC and Oregon
Clinton takes Indiana and the rest

No on gas tax costs Obama a handful of swing voters. Others he wasn't getting anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama gets NC and Oregon<br />
Clinton takes Indiana and the rest</p>
<p>No on gas tax costs Obama a handful of swing voters. Others he wasn't getting anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niccolo Machiavelli</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49478</link>
		<author>Niccolo Machiavelli</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49478</guid>
		<description>Wrong Larry, McCain OFTEN does this sort of stuff, its really his MO if not his PR.

But ddartley's sentiment "I have always hoped for Obama to win the 08 nomination.", jeesh. I'm afraid is not good enough for me.  He has to actually win  the fucking election.  If he is not going to, I'll take Clinton.  Supporting a principled loser is not an option in this election.

McCain is far the worst despite what his "base" in the press thinks. For many reasons, from war and torture to transit. But this stuff is entirely predictable and his positions have been horrible over the years coming as he does from the gas powered flatlands.  He has fought AMTRAK for decades from when Tom Downs had the temerity to ask for $0.02 per gallon of the gas tax for AMTRAK.  Had that money been provide back then AMTRAK would be expanding and improving service not laying people off, and who would have really been worse for it.

It has been a wonderful opportunity for him to distinguish himself from Clinton, finally something of substance besides the war.  He could use it to counterpoint a lot of arguments linking foreign policy, environmental policy, labor policy and economic policy.  I hope he does and I hope it works.

But really this falls into the category of his campaign thinking a lot of the electorate, especially the new voters just signing up in this election cycle.  I don't share his optimistic view of the electorate and their good angels.  If he loses NC because of the NASCAR dads, he will be in worse shape and so will we.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong Larry, McCain OFTEN does this sort of stuff, its really his MO if not his PR.</p>
<p>But ddartley's sentiment "I have always hoped for Obama to win the 08 nomination.", jeesh. I'm afraid is not good enough for me.  He has to actually win  the fucking election.  If he is not going to, I'll take Clinton.  Supporting a principled loser is not an option in this election.</p>
<p>McCain is far the worst despite what his "base" in the press thinks. For many reasons, from war and torture to transit. But this stuff is entirely predictable and his positions have been horrible over the years coming as he does from the gas powered flatlands.  He has fought AMTRAK for decades from when Tom Downs had the temerity to ask for $0.02 per gallon of the gas tax for AMTRAK.  Had that money been provide back then AMTRAK would be expanding and improving service not laying people off, and who would have really been worse for it.</p>
<p>It has been a wonderful opportunity for him to distinguish himself from Clinton, finally something of substance besides the war.  He could use it to counterpoint a lot of arguments linking foreign policy, environmental policy, labor policy and economic policy.  I hope he does and I hope it works.</p>
<p>But really this falls into the category of his campaign thinking a lot of the electorate, especially the new voters just signing up in this election cycle.  I don't share his optimistic view of the electorate and their good angels.  If he loses NC because of the NASCAR dads, he will be in worse shape and so will we.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49464</link>
		<author>d</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49464</guid>
		<description>One year ago, gas was about 63 cents lower per gallon than it is now, so an 18 cents per gallon break won't do much, unless you only started noticing high gas prices in the last week or so. 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_home_page.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One year ago, gas was about 63 cents lower per gallon than it is now, so an 18 cents per gallon break won't do much, unless you only started noticing high gas prices in the last week or so. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_home_page.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_home_page.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49462</link>
		<author>Spud Spudly</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49462</guid>
		<description>Hard core Clinton superdelegate switches sides, cites Obama's gas tax stance as one reason:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D90CUR1O0&#38;show_article=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard core Clinton superdelegate switches sides, cites Obama's gas tax stance as one reason:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D90CUR1O0&amp;show_article=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D90CUR1O0&amp;show_article=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49457</link>
		<author>Larry Littlefield</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49457</guid>
		<description>You know what's best about it?  

If Obama does win the nomination, when the general election rolls around McCain's gas tax suspension would have been over!  

So Obama could hammer him on that -- his energy policy would have expired, and "you'd be no better off than before right now, just like you are worse off after 20 years of pandering to some people's desire for the cheap &#38; easy."

McCain usually doesn't go in for this kind of BS, which is why the pols show him competitive, even in NYC, when Republicans overall are about as popular as they were in 1932.  That's why I don't think it was "shrewd."  J6P isn't as clueless everywhere as in NY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what's best about it?  </p>
<p>If Obama does win the nomination, when the general election rolls around McCain's gas tax suspension would have been over!  </p>
<p>So Obama could hammer him on that -- his energy policy would have expired, and "you'd be no better off than before right now, just like you are worse off after 20 years of pandering to some people's desire for the cheap &amp; easy."</p>
<p>McCain usually doesn't go in for this kind of BS, which is why the pols show him competitive, even in NYC, when Republicans overall are about as popular as they were in 1932.  That's why I don't think it was "shrewd."  J6P isn't as clueless everywhere as in NY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shemp</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49456</link>
		<author>Shemp</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49456</guid>
		<description>Also agree with d.  It would just be ridiculous messaging to suggest to the population of North Carolina that switching to transit is at all viable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also agree with d.  It would just be ridiculous messaging to suggest to the population of North Carolina that switching to transit is at all viable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49453</link>
		<author>Larry Littlefield</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/05/01/obama-fires-back-with-gas-tax-ad/#comment-49453</guid>
		<description>(In an ad like this, I'm glad Obama didn't mention public transit. "I want to give you money in your pocket," they would have said. "And my opponent wants you to take the bus." It would be exploited and manipulated to no end.)

Agreed.

I can't see the ad, but I hope it mentions that gasoline prices are up from $1.50 to $4.00, and the solution is to cut transportation investment by giving you back 18 cents.

He really ought to make hay with this, not back away, because "gas tax cut" and "windfall profits" and "gouging" have been repeated over and over.  Where has it got us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(In an ad like this, I'm glad Obama didn't mention public transit. "I want to give you money in your pocket," they would have said. "And my opponent wants you to take the bus." It would be exploited and manipulated to no end.)</p>
<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>I can't see the ad, but I hope it mentions that gasoline prices are up from $1.50 to $4.00, and the solution is to cut transportation investment by giving you back 18 cents.</p>
<p>He really ought to make hay with this, not back away, because "gas tax cut" and "windfall profits" and "gouging" have been repeated over and over.  Where has it got us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
