Paul Newell on Starting a Political Campaign in New York City
Last week Streetsblog caught up with Paul Newell, who's mounting the first primary challenge to Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver in 22 years. Discussing his candidacy, Newell made it clear that he is in it to win it. (He picked up some momentum yesterday, garnering the endorsement of BlogPAC, which describes itself as "a consortium of progressive bloggers from all 50 states.")
We're running excerpts from the interview in two parts. In this segment, complementing our previous look at what it takes to get on the ballot, Newell shares his advice for potential candidates and sheds light on the mechanics of running for office. In the second part, which we'll run tomorrow, Newell talks about why he decided to run against Silver, and how he believes transportation -- and Albany -- should be reformed.
Streetsblog: What's your advice for someone pondering a run for office?
Paul Newell: A lot of people will say that you can't beat an incumbent in New York. And they're wrong. Incumbents do lose, number one. Number two, times have changed. The times when these old machine candidates just turn out, punch out votes and kill any opposition are over. We do not live in that city.
Running for office is an incredible opportunity. You will learn more about yourself, your community, your state, than you ever could. You will meet amazing people, and you will have an opportunity to dramatically change your community for the better. It is fun. It is hard work, and it is worth doing.
SB: Say someone makes the decision to run tomorrow. Does that give them enough time to get the organization beneath them that they need to mount a credible campaign? If not, is there still something worthwhile that could come out of a challenge to an incumbent?
PN: There's always something worthwhile to come out of a challenge to an incumbent -- just to get them aware of their community again.
I don't think it's too late. It depends on what kind of network the individual has. But it's closing in on too late. June 3rd is petitioning, so by June 3rd you need to have an organization in place with money in the bank and a strategy to do petitioning. That is really the actual deadline.
Honestly, people don't make decisions in elections until shortly before they vote anyway. You see that all the time. So if you can get an organization together in the next month and a half, no it's not too late. But I would get started.
I think it is good for democracy, for our city and for our state, for incumbents to be challenged in every election. I believe that it is not healthy for anybody to run unopposed for elective office, ever.
I would be thrilled to talk with, meet with -- discreetly or publicly
-- anybody considering running for another seat in the New York City
area, or anywhere in New York State. [Editor's note: Newell can be contacted through his website.]
SB: Walk us through what it takes to get on the ballot.
PN: Well the ballot access process starts in June. The only requirement is you have to be registered in the relevant party and reside in the district for more than a year. If one meets that criteria, then one needs to collect, for State Assembly it's 500 signatures from registered Democrats residing in the district. In point of fact you need a lot more than that, because the whole system is written to prevent challenges.
So you can start collecting signatures on June 3rd. You hand them in the second week of July. And you spend the next four weeks fighting a court battle against your incumbent, who will try to throw you off the ballot. Even if they think their case has no shot, they will try to throw you off the ballot, just to waste your time and money.
The process though, is you break out petitions, you get your team together, you set up stations, you knock on people's doors, you do site-based things, outside of supermarkets and subway stations and what have you, and you collect signatures. You make sure they work, you bind 'em right, you cover all the legal ends, and you'll get on the ballot.
SB: Tell me more about the fundraising aspect and the organizing aspect. What did you have in place, and what did you know you needed to do to mount your campaign?
PN: The first thing you have to do is talk to your family and loved ones and figure out if it's something you want to do. You have to make a personal decision first. And the way you do that is you talk to the people in your life. You also talk to anyone you know who has run for office, and any candidates that you have worked for in the past. I called up some candidates that I had never met and asked for advice. Just asked them what's involved in this, how do you make this decision. You have to learn that first.
Then you start doing the feasibility portion of it. You say, "This is something that I want to do," and determine that I will be able to accomplish what I'm trying to accomplish by doing it. Then you say, "Can we do it?" And that is also a process of talking to people in the community, gauging that there is real need for change...
The first official thing you do, in terms of an official legal act, is you have to form a fundraising committee. And that's just filing some paperwork with the Board of Elections -- either the State or the City, depending on the office you're running for. They're very helpful folks up there in Albany, they're actually great. They'll prompt you to open a bank account. I started my bank account with $100 in pre-donated money. Then you start reaching out to people you know. Start first with your friends and your family, who support what you're trying to do, and you call and you ask them for money. And that's a hard thing for a lot of people to do. You have to remember that you're doing this for a reason. You have to believe that them giving you money will improve our community... Otherwise it's very hard to ask people for money.
You need to form a braintrust... There's a couple of categories of braintrust that you need: You need a finance braintrust, you need a policy braintrust, and you need a campaign braintrust.
You need people who can help you think of ways to reach out to raise money. You need people who know the issues facing your community well, and can help you formulate your positions, write them up. You have to believe of course, but work with people to write up these positions so they make sense, so they're cogent. And then you need to start talking to people who you need to reach out to. How does this district break down? How am I gonna reach out to people in the community?
And then, once you're there -- In New York City, if you're running for office, there's nothing you can do better than knocking on doors. I need a few thousand votes. I need, certainly, less than 10,000 votes to radically change the way 19 million New Yorkers are governed. I knock on doors every day. And I'm not knocking on doors because it sounds good... If in an hour of knocking on doors, I have four conversations, that's worth it.
My goal is to be elected Assemblyman for the 64th District. This is not running for President. I can meet enough people to win this race.
Photo: newellnyc.org
RSS feed for comments on this post.


Newell's problem is that the only people who are going to vote in that election are the people in that district. If you put it to a statewide vote he'd probably win in a landslide.
Comment by Spud Spudly — April 29, 2008 @ 11:22 am | Link
"There's always something worthwhile to come out of a challenge to an incumbent -- just to get them aware of their community again."
I certainly agree with that.
Just getting on the ballot and atrracting some attention and votes might be enough to put the fear of God (otherwise the only person other than the DA who can remove them from office) into them. I hope challengers can get on the ballot. It isn't easy.
And I hope Streetsblog will take the time to interview any challenger who does on its issues of concern, thereby breaking the media boycott of challengers by organizations who trumpt every $1 million pork grant described in a press release.
I continues to believe the media and the ballot scam are the two biggest obstables to competitive elections -- not money.
Comment by Larry Littlefield — April 29, 2008 @ 11:54 am | Link
Oh, and Paul, DONT' FORGET THE NOTORIZATION OF THE PETITIONS AND THE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE!
And the required financial disclosure forms -- yours, not just the campaign's. It was due July 22 the year I ran, and the form can be found in "S 73-a. Financial disclosure." It mut be returned to the Director of the Legislative Ethics Committee -- certified so they can't say they didn't get it when they come to clap you in irons.
Comment by Larry Littlefield — April 29, 2008 @ 12:00 pm | Link
Ben-
Thanks again for the post, and for all Streetsblog does to promote a more human-centered approach to transportation and use of space in New York City.
I’ll check in through the day and try and answer any questions people have. Please feel free to contact me through our website, www.NewellNYC.org.
Spud – Lower Manhattanites are as receptive to a message of change as the rest of the state. Sheldon Silver’s failures have impacted us as much as anyone. Indeed, of 150 Assembly Districts in NY State, none is more directly impacted by traffic congestion than the 64th. I’ve knocked on thousands of doors downtown, and I can tell you that people are ready for change.
But yes, this is obviously a race with statewide impact – which is why we are getting so much support from throughout the state.
Larry – Thanks. I know you have also run for office in the past, as well as brining valuable common sense to a lot of policy debates. But I disagree that the corrupting influence of money can be discounted. Clean Money Clean Elections is the only sure route to a Clean Government.
Comment by Paul Newell — April 29, 2008 @ 12:08 pm | Link
Paul
Let's say you're elected and the new Speaker is the same as Silver on Assembly rules and doesn't bring important matters to the floor for a vote, but rather just has a closed secret debate of just the majority party, similar to what happened to congestion pricing. Would you participate in the closed meeting?
Comment by Glenn — April 29, 2008 @ 12:36 pm | Link
Glenn - great question.
I am convinced that we will not see more of the same when I am in office. Nothing wakes an incumbent politician more than the thought that they could lose their comfortable sinecure. When I beat Sheldon Silver downtown on a platform of ending the culture of failure in Albany, I promise you the caucus will elect a Speaker committed to real reform.
Comment by Paul Newell — April 29, 2008 @ 2:31 pm | Link
Paul, congratulations on taking on Sheldon Silver! If only I lived in the 64th AD and could vote for you...
One of your stated positions is restoring home rule to New York City over rent regulation. Are you also looking to restore home rule to New York City over transportation and livable streets issues? For example, I understand that one reason congestion pricing needed to be voted on by the NYS legislature was that the plan involved enforcement cameras. Also, I've read on this blog that a full implementation of BRT may also depend on state legislative approval (once again because of camera enforcement).
Comment by Urbanis — April 29, 2008 @ 4:40 pm | Link
Paul, BTW, I've given you a plug on my blog.
Comment by Urbanis — April 29, 2008 @ 4:41 pm | Link
Urbanis-
1. In general, yes, I support more home rule on transportation issues. It does get thorny, however, with Authority oversight. The MTA, the TBTA, Port Authority and other relevant agencies operate under state charters. If Albany were not such a broken, corrupt system, then that oversight would be best done by the relevant state legislative committees.
Of course, they have been utterly failing to oversee Public Authorities for decades. Indeed it is not even known for certain how many public authorities exist in NYS (at least 700). But that is another question.
2. Too bad you don't live in the 64th. But there are always other ways to help. Come down and volunteer. Or you can help here: http://www.newellnyc.org/donate.html
Comment by Paul Newell — April 29, 2008 @ 5:04 pm | Link
Paul, thanks for your thoughtful response. I've made a donation to your campaign and will continue to follow it with great interest!
Comment by Urbanis — April 29, 2008 @ 5:20 pm | Link
Bonne Chance! I'd rather see Mr. Silver go down than Joe Bruno. I say that as an upstate Democrat and Delaware County committeeman. I wish I cld man phone banks for you, etc, but as it is all I can do is send you a few paltry bucks.
I can't emphasize enough the importance of boots on the ground. If you have a zealous, dedicated volunteer organization, willing to host meet-ups knock on doors have booths at street fairs you will win. We did it for Kirsten Gillibrand uphill against a 2-1 Republican registration advantage. TheDFA training program is great, by the way. Get Jim Dean's team in there to pump things up .
Comment by Dick Mulliken — April 30, 2008 @ 4:14 pm | Link
If Paul Newell is committed to winning, he can. I am ready to do everything I can to help him. This is a tremendous opportunity; let's not let it go. Do his supporters have a network or any way of organizing yet?
Comment by Elizabeth — May 1, 2008 @ 2:22 pm | Link