<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The City Council Vote in Two Dimensions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:07:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47324</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47324</guid>
		<description>Why would money from congestion pricing magically disappear into bowels and money from tax increases &quot;build good mass transit&quot;? Is there a separate digestive system for funding you approve of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would money from congestion pricing magically disappear into bowels and money from tax increases "build good mass transit"? Is there a separate digestive system for funding you approve of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seamus</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47307</link>
		<dc:creator>Seamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47307</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but if you buy the rational for congestion pricing you&#039;re drinking Bloomberg&#039;s kool aid. It is simply a reframing of putting tolls on the east river bridges as a revenue generator from four years ago. Congestion, environment, children&#039;s asthma, all part of the reframe. The money will not add to mass transit infrastructure other than adding a few busses and will magically disappear into the bowels of the MTA. And the convoluted side effects - millions of dollars of cameras, civil liberties abuses, resident parking, rerouting of traffic will cause more problems than it solves. 

Raise taxes, build good mass transit, people will use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sorry but if you buy the rational for congestion pricing you're drinking Bloomberg's kool aid. It is simply a reframing of putting tolls on the east river bridges as a revenue generator from four years ago. Congestion, environment, children's asthma, all part of the reframe. The money will not add to mass transit infrastructure other than adding a few busses and will magically disappear into the bowels of the MTA. And the convoluted side effects - millions of dollars of cameras, civil liberties abuses, resident parking, rerouting of traffic will cause more problems than it solves. </p>
<p>Raise taxes, build good mass transit, people will use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47297</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47297</guid>
		<description>Pardon????  People are going to drive north into the Bronx and deal with that mess and then over another bridge into Manhattan?  Are you serious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon????  People are going to drive north into the Bronx and deal with that mess and then over another bridge into Manhattan?  Are you serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47294</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47294</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe we basically gave New Jersey a free ride again. We had a chance to get some revenue from untaxed users of New York taxpayer provided services and we let it go.  I just don&#039;t understand taxing the borough residents more and the nontaxpaying neighbors less.  

And did resident parking make it in the end?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe we basically gave New Jersey a free ride again. We had a chance to get some revenue from untaxed users of New York taxpayer provided services and we let it go.  I just don't understand taxing the borough residents more and the nontaxpaying neighbors less.  </p>
<p>And did resident parking make it in the end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47251</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47251</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wouldn&#039;t Vallone have a legitimate gripe about increased usage of the Triboro Bridge, Astoria Boulevard and the GCP if CP credits people for the toll they pay on the bridge? I mean, if one of the goals is to eliminate toll shopping then won&#039;t that cause a net increase of traffic over the expensive bridge and through his district?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I seriously doubt it would cause a net increase in traffic.  Most of the potential toll shoppers east of, say, Junction Boulevard would probably switch to the Whitestone or Throgs Neck bridges before the Triboro.

Those west of Junction Boulevard - and close enough to GCP to make it worth switching - probably already drive through Vallone&#039;s district, whether on the BQE, Northern Boulevard, Vernon Boulevad or any number of smaller north-south streets to get to the Queensborough Bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wouldn't Vallone have a legitimate gripe about increased usage of the Triboro Bridge, Astoria Boulevard and the GCP if CP credits people for the toll they pay on the bridge? I mean, if one of the goals is to eliminate toll shopping then won't that cause a net increase of traffic over the expensive bridge and through his district?</p></blockquote>
<p>I seriously doubt it would cause a net increase in traffic.  Most of the potential toll shoppers east of, say, Junction Boulevard would probably switch to the Whitestone or Throgs Neck bridges before the Triboro.</p>
<p>Those west of Junction Boulevard - and close enough to GCP to make it worth switching - probably already drive through Vallone's district, whether on the BQE, Northern Boulevard, Vernon Boulevad or any number of smaller north-south streets to get to the Queensborough Bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glue</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47243</link>
		<dc:creator>glue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47243</guid>
		<description>Josh
Don&#039;t take my comment as gospel, i had Mr. Reynoso on the phone for about half an hour and was not taking notes.
If anything i wrote is at odds with facts you are familiar with, it&#039;s possible my memory is distorted.
I&#039;d check with Diana Reyna&#039;s office if it&#039;s important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh<br />
Don't take my comment as gospel, i had Mr. Reynoso on the phone for about half an hour and was not taking notes.<br />
If anything i wrote is at odds with facts you are familiar with, it's possible my memory is distorted.<br />
I'd check with Diana Reyna's office if it's important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47239</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47239</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that info, Glue.  I&#039;m confused about one thing, though, aren&#039;t all neighborhoods going to get the opportunity to institute residential parking permits in order to guard against the potential park-and-ride effect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that info, Glue.  I'm confused about one thing, though, aren't all neighborhoods going to get the opportunity to institute residential parking permits in order to guard against the potential park-and-ride effect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47227</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47227</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t Vallone have a legitimate gripe about increased usage of the Triboro Bridge, Astoria Boulevard and the GCP if CP credits people for the toll they pay on the bridge?  I mean, if one of the goals is to eliminate toll shopping then won&#039;t that cause a net increase of traffic over the expensive bridge and through his district?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn't Vallone have a legitimate gripe about increased usage of the Triboro Bridge, Astoria Boulevard and the GCP if CP credits people for the toll they pay on the bridge?  I mean, if one of the goals is to eliminate toll shopping then won't that cause a net increase of traffic over the expensive bridge and through his district?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdr</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47221</link>
		<dc:creator>fdr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47221</guid>
		<description>With the exception of southern Queens, it looks like most of the opposition came from districts that have the poorest mass transit. Which would indicate that those council members didn&#039;t buy the promise of transit improvements, or thought that their constituents didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the exception of southern Queens, it looks like most of the opposition came from districts that have the poorest mass transit. Which would indicate that those council members didn't buy the promise of transit improvements, or thought that their constituents didn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glue</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47203</link>
		<dc:creator>glue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47203</guid>
		<description>Just got off the phone with Council Member Reyna&#039;s office. Her staffer in charge of congestion pricing - Antonio Reynoso - gave me the full and surprisingly nuanced story behind her decision to vote &quot;no&quot;. I expected to just express my displeasure and be shooed away!
Basically she was on the fence until the last minute. The environmental issue is obvious but she didn&#039;t feel her constituents were getting anything in the deal.
The biggest supposed perk is the express bus from Middle Village to Downtown, but this would go down Metropolitan which is a) already congested so the bus would take 2 hours to make the trip and b) already a polluted truck route with schools along it with no air conditioning. 
The MTA shot down any chance of further increased capacity on the L, extending the G, or creating a transfer from the J to the V and/or the G.
Apparently she was also peeved that nobody even tried to offer her anything for Williamsburg/Bushwick until it became clear she was undecided.
And, the big unknown is still how bad will the park &amp; ride phenomenon be? Nobody can say with certainty and no amelioration was offered for her district (i.e. resident permits).
So all this doesn&#039;t affect my opinion of the congestion plan, but i am no longer annoyed at her vote and can understand how she came to her decision.
That&#039;s my sharing for the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got off the phone with Council Member Reyna's office. Her staffer in charge of congestion pricing - Antonio Reynoso - gave me the full and surprisingly nuanced story behind her decision to vote "no". I expected to just express my displeasure and be shooed away!<br />
Basically she was on the fence until the last minute. The environmental issue is obvious but she didn't feel her constituents were getting anything in the deal.<br />
The biggest supposed perk is the express bus from Middle Village to Downtown, but this would go down Metropolitan which is a) already congested so the bus would take 2 hours to make the trip and b) already a polluted truck route with schools along it with no air conditioning.<br />
The MTA shot down any chance of further increased capacity on the L, extending the G, or creating a transfer from the J to the V and/or the G.<br />
Apparently she was also peeved that nobody even tried to offer her anything for Williamsburg/Bushwick until it became clear she was undecided.<br />
And, the big unknown is still how bad will the park &amp; ride phenomenon be? Nobody can say with certainty and no amelioration was offered for her district (i.e. resident permits).<br />
So all this doesn't affect my opinion of the congestion plan, but i am no longer annoyed at her vote and can understand how she came to her decision.<br />
That's my sharing for the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmc</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47192</link>
		<dc:creator>jmc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47192</guid>
		<description>Congestion pricing is so unfair to Foster&#039;s district especially. So many people drive daily into the CBD from their homes in the South Bronx and park for free in Midtown, they&#039;re going to be harmed terribly by this proposal. Unfortunately she had important business to attend to in Vegas and so she wasn&#039;t able to protect the people of Melrose, all of whom drive to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congestion pricing is so unfair to Foster's district especially. So many people drive daily into the CBD from their homes in the South Bronx and park for free in Midtown, they're going to be harmed terribly by this proposal. Unfortunately she had important business to attend to in Vegas and so she wasn't able to protect the people of Melrose, all of whom drive to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bureaucrat</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47189</link>
		<dc:creator>bureaucrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47189</guid>
		<description>thanks, doc, for making me laugh out loud a few times in the past couple days..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, doc, for making me laugh out loud a few times in the past couple days..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Fried</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47188</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47188</guid>
		<description>Josh, that might have been a temporary hiccup. The link is correct and should function if you try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, that might have been a temporary hiccup. The link is correct and should function if you try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47184</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47184</guid>
		<description>The link to the car commute rates post is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to the car commute rates post is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47177</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47177</guid>
		<description>&quot;Another 20% drive to soup kitchens in the CBD&quot;

What the transit riding elite do not understand is that most soup kitchens operate as dive-thrus only. This regressive tax is going to raise the cost of soup by $8 for the homeless, who have no choice but to drive SUVs large enough to accommodate their grocery carts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Another 20% drive to soup kitchens in the CBD"</p>
<p>What the transit riding elite do not understand is that most soup kitchens operate as dive-thrus only. This regressive tax is going to raise the cost of soup by $8 for the homeless, who have no choice but to drive SUVs large enough to accommodate their grocery carts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47173</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47173</guid>
		<description>Few commute by car to the CBD. But 75% of the non-commuting constituents in the &quot;no&quot; council districts drive to the CBD everyday to see their doctors. Another 20% drive to soup kitchens in the CBD, and another 10% drive to the CBD to offer religious counsel and guidance. The remaining 5% would drive into the CBD, but are busy getting their car serviced at the local garage or driving around dropping care packages off for local elderly and infirm people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few commute by car to the CBD. But 75% of the non-commuting constituents in the "no" council districts drive to the CBD everyday to see their doctors. Another 20% drive to soup kitchens in the CBD, and another 10% drive to the CBD to offer religious counsel and guidance. The remaining 5% would drive into the CBD, but are busy getting their car serviced at the local garage or driving around dropping care packages off for local elderly and infirm people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47172</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47172</guid>
		<description>The brightest-throbbing sore thumbs there are the districts of Vallone, Sears and Katz.  Sears even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/04/02/2008-04-02_mayor_touts_labors_backing_uniforms_stil.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;took the subway&lt;/a&gt; to vote No.  I don&#039;t know what was going on with Reyna and Foster.

Still, I think it&#039;s pretty clear that this is not the &quot;Manhattan vs. the outer boroughs&quot; fight that the opponents claimed it was.  I sent Gioia &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ericgioia.com/contribute&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a little thank-you&lt;/a&gt; yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brightest-throbbing sore thumbs there are the districts of Vallone, Sears and Katz.  Sears even <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/04/02/2008-04-02_mayor_touts_labors_backing_uniforms_stil.html" rel="nofollow">took the subway</a> to vote No.  I don't know what was going on with Reyna and Foster.</p>
<p>Still, I think it's pretty clear that this is not the "Manhattan vs. the outer boroughs" fight that the opponents claimed it was.  I sent Gioia <a href="http://www.ericgioia.com/contribute" rel="nofollow">a little thank-you</a> yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47169</link>
		<dc:creator>d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47169</guid>
		<description>According to that list, there isn&#039;t a single district where more than 10% of the residents commute by car into Manhattan.  Those council members who voted against congestion pricing are clearly willing to sacrifice 90% of their constituents on the altar of automobile dependency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to that list, there isn't a single district where more than 10% of the residents commute by car into Manhattan.  Those council members who voted against congestion pricing are clearly willing to sacrifice 90% of their constituents on the altar of automobile dependency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-47167</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/04/02/the-city-council-vote-in-two-dimensions/#comment-47167</guid>
		<description>How do the green states correspond to the city&#039;s population? I see all of Manhattan, all of the Bronx, maybe half of Brooklyn, smaller bits of Queens and SI ... do pro-pricing districts represent a majority of city residents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do the green states correspond to the city's population? I see all of Manhattan, all of the Bronx, maybe half of Brooklyn, smaller bits of Queens and SI ... do pro-pricing districts represent a majority of city residents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
