<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloomberg: Expect Some Tweaks to Pricing Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Meese</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Meese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46856</guid>
		<description>Mark, I think the low income drivers Bloomberg refers to are the Cadillac-driving &quot;welfare queens&quot; Reagan used to talk about, many of whom, like Lew, don&#039;t like riding the subway.  They&#039;ll get a rebate while the rest of the city&#039;s low income population continues to ride mass transit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I think the low income drivers Bloomberg refers to are the Cadillac-driving &#8220;welfare queens&#8221; Reagan used to talk about, many of whom, like Lew, don&#8217;t like riding the subway.  They&#8217;ll get a rebate while the rest of the city&#8217;s low income population continues to ride mass transit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46849</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46849</guid>
		<description>I agree that toll inequalities need to be addressed but would argue that the solution is one-way tolls everywhere to end toll-shopping.  Easy to install EZ-Pass and cameras at all crossings.

Tolls on the East and Harlem river bridges also need to be implemented; just because the bridges are supposedly &quot;paid off&quot; doesn&#039;t mean they are free to maintain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that toll inequalities need to be addressed but would argue that the solution is one-way tolls everywhere to end toll-shopping.  Easy to install EZ-Pass and cameras at all crossings.</p>
<p>Tolls on the East and Harlem river bridges also need to be implemented; just because the bridges are supposedly &#8220;paid off&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean they are free to maintain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uSkyscraper</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46847</link>
		<dc:creator>uSkyscraper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46847</guid>
		<description>The NJ issue and one-way/two-way toll issue must be addressed.  Yes, all should pay equally, which is exactly the point.  Cut the money-hogging PA down on their tolls ($6 was plenty for structures that were paid off 50 years ago) so that at least some money from the PA bridges/tunnels goes to CP.  

And I agree, the two-way tolling is brutally unfair unless both directions get credited in the scheme.  No reason that the two-way tolls couldn&#039;t be changed to one-ways - just cut out the plaza going out and double the price.  You can&#039;t have crazy distortions ruining the whole scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NJ issue and one-way/two-way toll issue must be addressed.  Yes, all should pay equally, which is exactly the point.  Cut the money-hogging PA down on their tolls ($6 was plenty for structures that were paid off 50 years ago) so that at least some money from the PA bridges/tunnels goes to CP.  </p>
<p>And I agree, the two-way tolling is brutally unfair unless both directions get credited in the scheme.  No reason that the two-way tolls couldn&#8217;t be changed to one-ways &#8211; just cut out the plaza going out and double the price.  You can&#8217;t have crazy distortions ruining the whole scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46844</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46844</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve said, this is all about the placards.  The police and fire unions certainly think so.  And they have come out in opposition to CP, as reported here:

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/03/police-fire-unions-come-out-ag.html

Once again, there are the political class overlords, represented here, and the executive class overlords.  The rest of us don&#039;t matter.  

We just get taxes and in theory get whatever public services and space are not allocated by placard or other means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve said, this is all about the placards.  The police and fire unions certainly think so.  And they have come out in opposition to CP, as reported here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/03/police-fire-unions-come-out-ag.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/03/police-fire-unions-come-out-ag.html</a></p>
<p>Once again, there are the political class overlords, represented here, and the executive class overlords.  The rest of us don&#8217;t matter.  </p>
<p>We just get taxes and in theory get whatever public services and space are not allocated by placard or other means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46841</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46841</guid>
		<description>Are you talking the VNB?  I&#039;m talking QMT, BBT and  other one-way MTA fees that are lower than the $8 CP fee.  That&#039;s where the issue is.

Can someone clarify; do tolls on the TB, GWB and VNB, HHB and others alsp qualify for the offset?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you talking the VNB?  I&#8217;m talking QMT, BBT and  other one-way MTA fees that are lower than the $8 CP fee.  That&#8217;s where the issue is.</p>
<p>Can someone clarify; do tolls on the TB, GWB and VNB, HHB and others alsp qualify for the offset?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ombud</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ombud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46839</guid>
		<description>No, Dave, if you pay a round trip $10 MTA fare you pay no CP fee.  The offset does not just apply to the in-bound trip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Dave, if you pay a round trip $10 MTA fare you pay no CP fee.  The offset does not just apply to the in-bound trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46837</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46837</guid>
		<description>Actually giving a $4 credit to the PA toll-payers had to be the way the fee is charged otherwise the system is unfair to those who pay the MTA two-way tolls.

If you pay $8 at the Holland Tunnel you pay nothing to CP and nothing to leave the city.

If you enter via the QMT you pay $5 toll, plus a $3 CP fee and $5 to leave via the tunnel.  If the toll was $10 round-trip you&#039;d pay no CP fee.

Reduce all tolls to their one-way equivalent before assessing CP fees.  This will mean charging a $4 CP fee to those using the HT, LT or GWB and eliminate the perceived NJ benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually giving a $4 credit to the PA toll-payers had to be the way the fee is charged otherwise the system is unfair to those who pay the MTA two-way tolls.</p>
<p>If you pay $8 at the Holland Tunnel you pay nothing to CP and nothing to leave the city.</p>
<p>If you enter via the QMT you pay $5 toll, plus a $3 CP fee and $5 to leave via the tunnel.  If the toll was $10 round-trip you&#8217;d pay no CP fee.</p>
<p>Reduce all tolls to their one-way equivalent before assessing CP fees.  This will mean charging a $4 CP fee to those using the HT, LT or GWB and eliminate the perceived NJ benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46835</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46835</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t the best tweak to the CP bill have been to have called it something else right from the very start?  This name &quot;Congestion Pricing&quot; is killing it.

It says, &quot;The streets are crowded and we&#039;re going to clear them up by pricing out the users who can least afford to pay.&quot;

That&#039;s distasteful to most people.  The name is elitist.  It&#039;s undemocratic.  It&#039;s a stick that&#039;s only being used against the most vulnerable drivers.

Two suggestions:

1) &quot;Mass Transit Fee&quot; -- There&#039;s something that&#039;s hard to oppose on any kind of class basis.  We already know that people are more supportive when they&#039;re told about how the money will go to fund mass transit.  And even drivers could be pitched on the idea by saying that improved mass transit will make their drives easier, and give them increased commuting options.  It&#039;s a carrot, not a stick.

2) &quot;Pollution Fee&quot; or &quot;Fresh Air Fee&quot; -- Who can oppose fresh air?  Even the lowest income drivers have to acknowledge that their cars produce exhaust.  You still give the money to mass transit, but you pitch it as a pollution measure that&#039;s going to help poor kids avoid asthma, not as a penalty to weed out the lowest income drivers.  Again, a carrot and not a stick.

This whole thing should be rebranded.  (Not that I want it to be -- I think the name&#039;s fine the way it is.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the best tweak to the CP bill have been to have called it something else right from the very start?  This name &#8220;Congestion Pricing&#8221; is killing it.</p>
<p>It says, &#8220;The streets are crowded and we&#8217;re going to clear them up by pricing out the users who can least afford to pay.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s distasteful to most people.  The name is elitist.  It&#8217;s undemocratic.  It&#8217;s a stick that&#8217;s only being used against the most vulnerable drivers.</p>
<p>Two suggestions:</p>
<p>1) &#8220;Mass Transit Fee&#8221; &#8212; There&#8217;s something that&#8217;s hard to oppose on any kind of class basis.  We already know that people are more supportive when they&#8217;re told about how the money will go to fund mass transit.  And even drivers could be pitched on the idea by saying that improved mass transit will make their drives easier, and give them increased commuting options.  It&#8217;s a carrot, not a stick.</p>
<p>2) &#8220;Pollution Fee&#8221; or &#8220;Fresh Air Fee&#8221; &#8212; Who can oppose fresh air?  Even the lowest income drivers have to acknowledge that their cars produce exhaust.  You still give the money to mass transit, but you pitch it as a pollution measure that&#8217;s going to help poor kids avoid asthma, not as a penalty to weed out the lowest income drivers.  Again, a carrot and not a stick.</p>
<p>This whole thing should be rebranded.  (Not that I want it to be &#8212; I think the name&#8217;s fine the way it is.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46834</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46834</guid>
		<description>My numerous pleas for two-way tolls everywhere have been ignored so let&#039;s try this:

The PA toll of $8 is in fact $4 each way, but paid once unlike the QMT, Triboro and other MTA crossings which have two-way tolling.

On this basis those crossing the Hudson and paying an $8 toll should only get a $4 credit toward the CP fee and have to pay an additional $4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My numerous pleas for two-way tolls everywhere have been ignored so let&#8217;s try this:</p>
<p>The PA toll of $8 is in fact $4 each way, but paid once unlike the QMT, Triboro and other MTA crossings which have two-way tolling.</p>
<p>On this basis those crossing the Hudson and paying an $8 toll should only get a $4 credit toward the CP fee and have to pay an additional $4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46832</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46832</guid>
		<description>The greater good would be to implement progressive policy in the income tax code, where it is visible and it can work. Screwing around with lower level systems, &quot;means testing&quot; every thing you can, drags down efficiency without significantly redistributing wealth. It assumes income level can be proven often and reliably, which is both wrong and disturbing. It is the desperate, ineffectual resort of a left wing that hasn&#039;t recovered from the Reagan years. But there isn&#039;t going to be a better opportunity to restore the income tax code than right now; if the left would rather fight for sliding discounts on haircuts than rise to the occasion and fix things where they need to be fixed, then to hell with their politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greater good would be to implement progressive policy in the income tax code, where it is visible and it can work. Screwing around with lower level systems, &#8220;means testing&#8221; every thing you can, drags down efficiency without significantly redistributing wealth. It assumes income level can be proven often and reliably, which is both wrong and disturbing. It is the desperate, ineffectual resort of a left wing that hasn&#8217;t recovered from the Reagan years. But there isn&#8217;t going to be a better opportunity to restore the income tax code than right now; if the left would rather fight for sliding discounts on haircuts than rise to the occasion and fix things where they need to be fixed, then to hell with their politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Car Free Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46830</link>
		<dc:creator>Car Free Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46830</guid>
		<description>Mitigating the impact on lower income drivers establishes a precedent that transit costs should be means-tested. If this gets passed, there is a strong argument for means testing public transportation, which would be a greater good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitigating the impact on lower income drivers establishes a precedent that transit costs should be means-tested. If this gets passed, there is a strong argument for means testing public transportation, which would be a greater good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46829</guid>
		<description>How will the income of these low-income drivers (an oxymoron as far as I&#039;m concerned) be determined?  Will they submit copies of their tax returns?  Or is this just another outbreak of placard-itis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will the income of these low-income drivers (an oxymoron as far as I&#8217;m concerned) be determined?  Will they submit copies of their tax returns?  Or is this just another outbreak of placard-itis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-46825</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/28/bloomberg-expect-some-tweaks-to-pricing-bill/#comment-46825</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll all for passing CP, but by &quot;mitigating the impact on lower-income drivers&quot; (the vast majority whom will pay ZERO), I&#039;m afraid we&#039;re heading down a slippery slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll all for passing CP, but by &#8220;mitigating the impact on lower-income drivers&#8221; (the vast majority whom will pay ZERO), I&#8217;m afraid we&#8217;re heading down a slippery slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

