<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mendez Bill Would Overturn NYPD Parade Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:07:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Be</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-52102</link>
		<dc:creator>Be</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-52102</guid>
		<description>This is excellent clarification of the law and is vast improvement of the NYPD rules. However, there will still be a crack down on Critical Mass because the new legilation allows summons, arrests and dispersals if the protest, etc... interferes with other legal uses of public space and/or traffic.  Basically, there will still have to be either court cases or a clarification of New York City and Stare laws on to what extent it is true when we bikes say &quot;We&#039;re not blocking traffic, we are traffic.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent clarification of the law and is vast improvement of the NYPD rules. However, there will still be a crack down on Critical Mass because the new legilation allows summons, arrests and dispersals if the protest, etc... interferes with other legal uses of public space and/or traffic.  Basically, there will still have to be either court cases or a clarification of New York City and Stare laws on to what extent it is true when we bikes say "We're not blocking traffic, we are traffic."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galvo</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46872</link>
		<dc:creator>galvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46872</guid>
		<description>i was trying to link this video from sept  07 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPCGqxn-zZI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was trying to link this video from sept  07 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPCGqxn-zZI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPCGqxn-zZI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galvo</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46871</link>
		<dc:creator>galvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46871</guid>
		<description>sept 07 same story, the end is the best nypd van parked in bike lane while they are ticketing bicyclist on the same block for not riding in bike lane
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sept 07 same story, the end is the best nypd van parked in bike lane while they are ticketing bicyclist on the same block for not riding in bike lane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heff</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46782</link>
		<dc:creator>Heff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46782</guid>
		<description>What do you mean?  That tank top is FABULOUS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean?  That tank top is FABULOUS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46759</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46759</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s not the NYPD, but the fashion police.  he&#039;s wearing a tank top that is only sanctioned for members of the Hungarian Circus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that's not the NYPD, but the fashion police.  he's wearing a tank top that is only sanctioned for members of the Hungarian Circus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46754</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46754</guid>
		<description>Jacob: read the legislation! the 100 number is moot, parading without a permit is decriminalized. There is no clause in the document that gives the police any authority to act on a group if it is over 100 and does not have a permit. In fact it has a clause that says Police may not disperse groups just because they do not have a permit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob: read the legislation! the 100 number is moot, parading without a permit is decriminalized. There is no clause in the document that gives the police any authority to act on a group if it is over 100 and does not have a permit. In fact it has a clause that says Police may not disperse groups just because they do not have a permit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46749</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46749</guid>
		<description>Typo-  I meant to say &quot;Quinn supported and defended the NYPD&#039;s version.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo-  I meant to say "Quinn supported and defended the NYPD's version."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46748</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46748</guid>
		<description>Big praise for Mendez, Gerson, and Brewer.

But remember, this is long overdue.  To anyone who at all values civil liberties, it was always clear that the NYPD&#039;s rules were illegitimate, and *the City Council was obligated to step in and clarify them* (and, separately, relax them from the NYPD&#039;s draconian rules--which were, yes, still draconian even after the revision NYPD made to them some months before--a revision designed to give the appearance of relaxing the rules, but that actually broadened the scope of people who could be arrested.)

Another thing--don&#039;t anyone forget that Quinn and defended the NYPD&#039;s version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big praise for Mendez, Gerson, and Brewer.</p>
<p>But remember, this is long overdue.  To anyone who at all values civil liberties, it was always clear that the NYPD's rules were illegitimate, and *the City Council was obligated to step in and clarify them* (and, separately, relax them from the NYPD's draconian rules--which were, yes, still draconian even after the revision NYPD made to them some months before--a revision designed to give the appearance of relaxing the rules, but that actually broadened the scope of people who could be arrested.)</p>
<p>Another thing--don't anyone forget that Quinn and defended the NYPD's version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46733</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46733</guid>
		<description>&quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably  to assemble AS LONG AS THE ASSEMBLED GROUP IS LESS THAN 100 PERSONS OR OBTAINS A GOVERNMENT-ISSUED PERMIT FIRST, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably  to assemble AS LONG AS THE ASSEMBLED GROUP IS LESS THAN 100 PERSONS OR OBTAINS A GOVERNMENT-ISSUED PERMIT FIRST, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
