<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mendez Bill Would Overturn NYPD Parade Rules</title>
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/</link>
	<description>Covering the Livable Streets Movement</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 04:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: galvo</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46872</link>
		<author>galvo</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46872</guid>
		<description>i was trying to link this video from sept  07 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPCGqxn-zZI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was trying to link this video from sept  07 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPCGqxn-zZI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPCGqxn-zZI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galvo</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46871</link>
		<author>galvo</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46871</guid>
		<description>sept 07 same story, the end is the best nypd van parked in bike lane while they are ticketing bicyclist on the same block for not riding in bike lane
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sept 07 same story, the end is the best nypd van parked in bike lane while they are ticketing bicyclist on the same block for not riding in bike lane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heff</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46782</link>
		<author>Heff</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46782</guid>
		<description>What do you mean?  That tank top is FABULOUS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean?  That tank top is FABULOUS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46759</link>
		<author>Pat</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46759</guid>
		<description>that's not the NYPD, but the fashion police.  he's wearing a tank top that is only sanctioned for members of the Hungarian Circus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that's not the NYPD, but the fashion police.  he's wearing a tank top that is only sanctioned for members of the Hungarian Circus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46754</link>
		<author>Will</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46754</guid>
		<description>Jacob: read the legislation! the 100 number is moot, parading without a permit is decriminalized. There is no clause in the document that gives the police any authority to act on a group if it is over 100 and does not have a permit. In fact it has a clause that says Police may not disperse groups just because they do not have a permit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob: read the legislation! the 100 number is moot, parading without a permit is decriminalized. There is no clause in the document that gives the police any authority to act on a group if it is over 100 and does not have a permit. In fact it has a clause that says Police may not disperse groups just because they do not have a permit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46749</link>
		<author>ddartley</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46749</guid>
		<description>Typo-  I meant to say "Quinn supported and defended the NYPD's version."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo-  I meant to say "Quinn supported and defended the NYPD's version."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46748</link>
		<author>ddartley</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46748</guid>
		<description>Big praise for Mendez, Gerson, and Brewer.

But remember, this is long overdue.  To anyone who at all values civil liberties, it was always clear that the NYPD's rules were illegitimate, and *the City Council was obligated to step in and clarify them* (and, separately, relax them from the NYPD's draconian rules--which were, yes, still draconian even after the revision NYPD made to them some months before--a revision designed to give the appearance of relaxing the rules, but that actually broadened the scope of people who could be arrested.)

Another thing--don't anyone forget that Quinn and defended the NYPD's version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big praise for Mendez, Gerson, and Brewer.</p>
<p>But remember, this is long overdue.  To anyone who at all values civil liberties, it was always clear that the NYPD's rules were illegitimate, and *the City Council was obligated to step in and clarify them* (and, separately, relax them from the NYPD's draconian rules--which were, yes, still draconian even after the revision NYPD made to them some months before--a revision designed to give the appearance of relaxing the rules, but that actually broadened the scope of people who could be arrested.)</p>
<p>Another thing--don't anyone forget that Quinn and defended the NYPD's version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46733</link>
		<author>Jacob</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/27/mendez-bill-would-overturn-nypd-parade-rules/#comment-46733</guid>
		<description>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably  to assemble AS LONG AS THE ASSEMBLED GROUP IS LESS THAN 100 PERSONS OR OBTAINS A GOVERNMENT-ISSUED PERMIT FIRST, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably  to assemble AS LONG AS THE ASSEMBLED GROUP IS LESS THAN 100 PERSONS OR OBTAINS A GOVERNMENT-ISSUED PERMIT FIRST, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
