Comments on: Pricing Bill Appears in Albany; Bloomberg and Paterson Meet http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/19/pricing-bill-appears-in-albany-bloomberg-and-paterson-meet/ Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:43:57 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Dave http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/19/pricing-bill-appears-in-albany-bloomberg-and-paterson-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-46342 Dave Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:19:59 +0000 http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/19/pricing-bill-appears-in-albany-bloomberg-and-paterson-meet/#comment-46342 I have said it beofre and feel I need to say ot again: BRODSKY IS EVIL AND A CITY-HATER He only cares about his wealthy constituents who pay nothing to the city to work here or drive here. Why don't we see more about his questionable ties to the city parking garage owners? Why don't we see a CP advocate publicly spank him for his city-hating views? I have said it beofre and feel I need to say ot again:

BRODSKY IS EVIL AND A CITY-HATER

He only cares about his wealthy constituents who pay nothing to the city to work here or drive here.

Why don't we see more about his questionable ties to the city parking garage owners? Why don't we see a CP advocate publicly spank him for his city-hating views?

]]> By: Glenn http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/19/pricing-bill-appears-in-albany-bloomberg-and-paterson-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-46341 Glenn Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:18:02 +0000 http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/19/pricing-bill-appears-in-albany-bloomberg-and-paterson-meet/#comment-46341 And the "Port Authority language" which likely means they have not resolved the New Jersey issue... And the "Port Authority language" which likely means they have not resolved the New Jersey issue...

]]> By: Pat http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/19/pricing-bill-appears-in-albany-bloomberg-and-paterson-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-46326 Pat Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:52:43 +0000 http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/19/pricing-bill-appears-in-albany-bloomberg-and-paterson-meet/#comment-46326 note the bit on the last page: "ISSUES STILL TO BE RESOLVED" "earned income tax credit" while Brodsky's charges of "regressive" have never held water (what's regressive about charging the wealthiest commuters and using the money to improve transit, the mode of the masses?) this ostensible hand-out to "low income motorists" (an oxymoron, what with parking being so expensive) will make his bs even more porous. note the bit on the last page:
"ISSUES STILL TO BE RESOLVED" "earned income tax credit"

while Brodsky's charges of "regressive" have never held water (what's regressive about charging the wealthiest commuters and using the money to improve transit, the mode of the masses?) this ostensible hand-out to "low income motorists" (an oxymoron, what with parking being so expensive) will make his bs even more porous.

]]>