<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s No Accident: Bike-Ped Safety Bill Clears Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:32:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave H.</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46127</guid>
		<description>For a version that makes the changes more apparent:

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/TOB/S/2008SB-00299-R00-SB.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a version that makes the changes more apparent:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/TOB/S/2008SB-00299-R00-SB.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/TOB/S/2008SB-00299-R00-SB.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave H.</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46126</guid>
		<description>In similar news, in Connecticut the General Assembly transportation committee just sent a bill to the Senate floor with a favorable recommendation (30 for, 1 against, 3 absent). 

AN ACT CONCERNING BICYCLE ACCESS AND SAFETY.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

Section 1. Section 14-232 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2008):

(a) Except as provided in sections 14-233 and 14-234, (1) the driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left thereof at a safe distance and shall not again drive to the right side of the highway until safely clear of the overtaken vehicle; and (2) the driver of an overtaken vehicle shall give way to the right in favor of the overtaking vehicle and shall not increase the speed of his vehicle until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. For the purposes of this subsection, &quot;safe distance&quot; means not less than three feet when the driver of a vehicle overtakes and passes a person riding a bicycle. 

(b) No vehicle shall be driven to the left side of the center of the highway in overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction unless the left side is clearly visible and is free of oncoming traffic for a sufficient distance ahead to permit such overtaking and passing to be completely made without interfering with the safe operation of any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction or any vehicle overtaken. 

(c) Violation of any provision of this section shall be an infraction. 

Sec. 2. Subsection (a) of section 13b-79p of the general statutes is amended by adding subdivision (22) as follows (Effective October 1, 2008):

(NEW) (22) Improving bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the state transportation system.

Sec. 3. Section 13a-57b of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2008):

The Commissioner of Transportation shall [, whenever possible, encourage the inclusion of] include areas for bicycles and pedestrians when (1) creating a layout of a state highway, in accordance with section 13a-57, or (2) relocating a state highway, in accordance with section 13a-56. 

Sec. 4. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2008) The Commissioner of Transportation shall, in consultation with groups advocating on behalf of bicyclists, develop and implement a state-wide &quot;Share the Road&quot; public awareness campaign to educate the public concerning the rights and responsibilities of both motorists and bicyclists as they jointly use the highways of this state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In similar news, in Connecticut the General Assembly transportation committee just sent a bill to the Senate floor with a favorable recommendation (30 for, 1 against, 3 absent). </p>
<p>AN ACT CONCERNING BICYCLE ACCESS AND SAFETY.</p>
<p>Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:</p>
<p>Section 1. Section 14-232 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2008):</p>
<p>(a) Except as provided in sections 14-233 and 14-234, (1) the driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left thereof at a safe distance and shall not again drive to the right side of the highway until safely clear of the overtaken vehicle; and (2) the driver of an overtaken vehicle shall give way to the right in favor of the overtaking vehicle and shall not increase the speed of his vehicle until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. For the purposes of this subsection, "safe distance" means not less than three feet when the driver of a vehicle overtakes and passes a person riding a bicycle. </p>
<p>(b) No vehicle shall be driven to the left side of the center of the highway in overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction unless the left side is clearly visible and is free of oncoming traffic for a sufficient distance ahead to permit such overtaking and passing to be completely made without interfering with the safe operation of any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction or any vehicle overtaken. </p>
<p>(c) Violation of any provision of this section shall be an infraction. </p>
<p>Sec. 2. Subsection (a) of section 13b-79p of the general statutes is amended by adding subdivision (22) as follows (Effective October 1, 2008):</p>
<p>(NEW) (22) Improving bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the state transportation system.</p>
<p>Sec. 3. Section 13a-57b of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2008):</p>
<p>The Commissioner of Transportation shall [, whenever possible, encourage the inclusion of] include areas for bicycles and pedestrians when (1) creating a layout of a state highway, in accordance with section 13a-57, or (2) relocating a state highway, in accordance with section 13a-56. </p>
<p>Sec. 4. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2008) The Commissioner of Transportation shall, in consultation with groups advocating on behalf of bicyclists, develop and implement a state-wide "Share the Road" public awareness campaign to educate the public concerning the rights and responsibilities of both motorists and bicyclists as they jointly use the highways of this state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooke</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46122</link>
		<dc:creator>brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46122</guid>
		<description>this is great news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is great news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46117</guid>
		<description>I disagree -- this new law takes aim squarely at the city&#039;s most unliveable streets.

Better design of dangerous intersections would be of enormous value, whether drivers are subjected to heightened education or not.  Reducing lanes, enforcing speed limits, adding medians as islands of safety, adding bollards to prevent curb-jumping, and timing traffic signals to give peds more time to cross would greatly increase safety for people on foot.  Of course, whether any of that&#039;ll happen as a result of this new law is uncertain.  But keeping official track of &quot;accidents&quot; is an absolutely essential first step to taking other measures.  I think the city council and the people who shepherded this law through it deserve enormous credit.  This is a really good thing.

Now, of course, the next step is to translate the information into tangible street redesign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree -- this new law takes aim squarely at the city's most unliveable streets.</p>
<p>Better design of dangerous intersections would be of enormous value, whether drivers are subjected to heightened education or not.  Reducing lanes, enforcing speed limits, adding medians as islands of safety, adding bollards to prevent curb-jumping, and timing traffic signals to give peds more time to cross would greatly increase safety for people on foot.  Of course, whether any of that'll happen as a result of this new law is uncertain.  But keeping official track of "accidents" is an absolutely essential first step to taking other measures.  I think the city council and the people who shepherded this law through it deserve enormous credit.  This is a really good thing.</p>
<p>Now, of course, the next step is to translate the information into tangible street redesign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john deere</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46115</link>
		<dc:creator>john deere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46115</guid>
		<description>Agreed with Charlie.  The location emphasis seems to focus solely on design, and would seem to omit important behavior/choice issues that are probably even more important than design in determining the cause &amp; prevention of crashes.  The best designs in the world will be of limited value at reducing pedestrian &amp; cyclist fatalities if street users lack a basic understanding of how traffic works, what the &#039;rules of the road &#039; are, and how to behave courteously and safely in traffic. 

I should add that FWHA research into bike crashes also uses crash types, and these can be found by googling &quot;Crash Type Manual&quot; or &quot;Carol Tan Crash Type Manual&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed with Charlie.  The location emphasis seems to focus solely on design, and would seem to omit important behavior/choice issues that are probably even more important than design in determining the cause &amp; prevention of crashes.  The best designs in the world will be of limited value at reducing pedestrian &amp; cyclist fatalities if street users lack a basic understanding of how traffic works, what the 'rules of the road ' are, and how to behave courteously and safely in traffic. </p>
<p>I should add that FWHA research into bike crashes also uses crash types, and these can be found by googling "Crash Type Manual" or "Carol Tan Crash Type Manual".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Komanoff</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46114</link>
		<dc:creator>Komanoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46114</guid>
		<description>I think the bill&#039;s emphasis on crash locations is misplaced. It would have been better to focus on crash &quot;types&quot; -- vehicle turned into pedestrian, vehicle aggressively passed cyclist, etc. -- as we did in KILLED BY AUTOMOBILE and THE ONLY GOOD CYCLIST (both available at www.rightofway.org, or by Googling those titles). The latter approach is far more amenable to amelioration, by enforcement, education, etc. It also puts the onus, appropriately, on driving and drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bill's emphasis on crash locations is misplaced. It would have been better to focus on crash "types" -- vehicle turned into pedestrian, vehicle aggressively passed cyclist, etc. -- as we did in KILLED BY AUTOMOBILE and THE ONLY GOOD CYCLIST (both available at <a href="http://www.rightofway.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.rightofway.org</a>, or by Googling those titles). The latter approach is far more amenable to amelioration, by enforcement, education, etc. It also puts the onus, appropriately, on driving and drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rmartin</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46103</link>
		<dc:creator>Rmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46103</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t they already been doing this for years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven't they already been doing this for years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lang</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46102</link>
		<dc:creator>lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46102</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s what&#039;s going on with nyc transportation - http://intothebox.tv/archive/70_A_Taxi_Tip__Good_cabbie_or_lost_cabbie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here's what's going on with nyc transportation - <a href="http://intothebox.tv/archive/70_A_Taxi_Tip__Good_cabbie_or_lost_cabbie?" rel="nofollow">http://intothebox.tv/archive/70_A_Taxi_Tip__Good_cabbie_or_lost_cabbie?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shishi</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/comment-page-1/#comment-46101</link>
		<dc:creator>shishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/03/14/its-no-accident-bike-ped-safety-bill-clears-council/#comment-46101</guid>
		<description>Great news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
