<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New DOT is Still Using the Old Measuring Stick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:01:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44811</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44811</guid>
		<description>Ed wrote:
&quot;- Percent of all NYC highways that receive a cleanliness rating of good&quot;

Zero point zero zero?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed wrote:<br />
"- Percent of all NYC highways that receive a cleanliness rating of good"</p>
<p>Zero point zero zero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44809</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44809</guid>
		<description>Hey I agree that the report is behind the times, but it says that 10 new measures were added to this year&#039;s report, including traffic fatalities. Isn&#039;t that some progress?


New DOT indicators
- Average time to fix traffic signals (hours)
- Average time to repair priority regulatory signs after notification (days)
- Average time to repair streetlights - by DOT (days)
- Average time to repair streetlights - by ConEd (days)
- Traffic fatalities - motorists/passengers
- Traffic fatalities - bicyclists/pedestrians
- Percent of metered spaces that have muni-meters (multi-space meters)
- Percent of all NYC highways that receive a cleanliness rating of good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I agree that the report is behind the times, but it says that 10 new measures were added to this year's report, including traffic fatalities. Isn't that some progress?</p>
<p>New DOT indicators<br />
- Average time to fix traffic signals (hours)<br />
- Average time to repair priority regulatory signs after notification (days)<br />
- Average time to repair streetlights - by DOT (days)<br />
- Average time to repair streetlights - by ConEd (days)<br />
- Traffic fatalities - motorists/passengers<br />
- Traffic fatalities - bicyclists/pedestrians<br />
- Percent of metered spaces that have muni-meters (multi-space meters)<br />
- Percent of all NYC highways that receive a cleanliness rating of good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44808</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44808</guid>
		<description>ok, well it is pretty sloppy to have a headline talking about old measurements and a graphic showing new ones. It makes me wonder how closely the writer read the report.  

The MMR and the TfL report are not comparable. One is a citywide report encompassing all agencies. The other focuses on a single (though wide reaching) program of a single agency. A fair comparison would be between the TfL report and the DOT&#039;s River Crossings report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, well it is pretty sloppy to have a headline talking about old measurements and a graphic showing new ones. It makes me wonder how closely the writer read the report.  </p>
<p>The MMR and the TfL report are not comparable. One is a citywide report encompassing all agencies. The other focuses on a single (though wide reaching) program of a single agency. A fair comparison would be between the TfL report and the DOT's River Crossings report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44807</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44807</guid>
		<description>London has been doing bureaucracy for longer than we have, doesn&#039;t it stand to reason that they&#039;re better at it than we are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>London has been doing bureaucracy for longer than we have, doesn't it stand to reason that they're better at it than we are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dotty</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44805</link>
		<dc:creator>Dotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44805</guid>
		<description>OK, Lee. DOT tweaked some of the categories a little bit this year. Whoopee. This is still essentially the same report as last year and the year before. 

As noted above, the MMR is supposed to provide us with an annual report on how city services &quot;are affecting the lives of New Yorkers.&quot; Knowing the number of traffic signals fixed and the time to do the repairs doesn&#039;t meet that mandate. This is a measurement of DOT&#039;s internal function. The London comparison is  apt, I think, because we see a city transpo agency that is setting real public policy goals and measuring their progress towards those goals.  

And, Jeffrey, who says the MMR is supposed to be  nothing more than a top-line accounting (&quot;analysis&quot; is too generous) of city agency operations? That&#039;s not what the City Charter says its supposed to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Lee. DOT tweaked some of the categories a little bit this year. Whoopee. This is still essentially the same report as last year and the year before. </p>
<p>As noted above, the MMR is supposed to provide us with an annual report on how city services "are affecting the lives of New Yorkers." Knowing the number of traffic signals fixed and the time to do the repairs doesn't meet that mandate. This is a measurement of DOT's internal function. The London comparison is  apt, I think, because we see a city transpo agency that is setting real public policy goals and measuring their progress towards those goals.  </p>
<p>And, Jeffrey, who says the MMR is supposed to be  nothing more than a top-line accounting ("analysis" is too generous) of city agency operations? That's not what the City Charter says its supposed to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Hyman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Hyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44804</guid>
		<description>I agree with lee; one report studies 22 square kilometres and the other provides a top-line analysis of the entire city of New York.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with lee; one report studies 22 square kilometres and the other provides a top-line analysis of the entire city of New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud Spudly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44802</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44802</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the average time it takes to fix a traffic light something more than a &quot;car-oriented metric?&quot;  Isn&#039;t every single person who is being transported on the surface of NYC in any manner at all dependent on traffic lights in a major way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't the average time it takes to fix a traffic light something more than a "car-oriented metric?"  Isn't every single person who is being transported on the surface of NYC in any manner at all dependent on traffic lights in a major way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Fried</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44801</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44801</guid>
		<description>Thanks Red. Having great editors sure helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Red. Having great editors sure helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44800</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44800</guid>
		<description>the same old measuring stick, used for the first time this year. 

It is interesting that the page image you show from the MMR uses measurements that are all entirely new to the report this year (page60.) It&#039;s only deja vu if you are from the future. 

Also comparing the MMR to a report solely designed to assess congestion pricing results is not a fair comparison. Especially since the DOT does not operate buses. If you want those stats go look at the MTA reports. http://mta.info/mta/ind-perform/per-nyct.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the same old measuring stick, used for the first time this year. </p>
<p>It is interesting that the page image you show from the MMR uses measurements that are all entirely new to the report this year (page60.) It's only deja vu if you are from the future. </p>
<p>Also comparing the MMR to a report solely designed to assess congestion pricing results is not a fair comparison. Especially since the DOT does not operate buses. If you want those stats go look at the MTA reports. <a href="http://mta.info/mta/ind-perform/per-nyct.htm" rel="nofollow">http://mta.info/mta/ind-perform/per-nyct.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/comment-page-1/#comment-44799</link>
		<dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/21/the-new-dot-is-still-using-the-old-measuring-stick/#comment-44799</guid>
		<description>Ben Fried has been doing a great job. Good pickup, Streetsblog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Fried has been doing a great job. Good pickup, Streetsblog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
