<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: galvo</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/comment-page-1/#comment-44630</link>
		<dc:creator>galvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/#comment-44630</guid>
		<description>Yonkers has been trying to get customers for the new york water taxi service. their plan has been to build parking to make the waterfront  area attractive to car owners/.commuters in westchester  There is one development whose  DGEIS comments are  due  feb 25 that call for 7000  parking spaces on the waterfront in 57 levels above ground at glenwood train station. water taxi would make  sense at this development, since the current daily commuter base of 1200 for these three stations would probably got to over 5000. i cant see how metro north could accommodate that crush at rush hour plus an additional 30 percent  overall with congestion pricing. it will be a couple years before the water taxi is economically viable in yonkers though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yonkers has been trying to get customers for the new york water taxi service. their plan has been to build parking to make the waterfront  area attractive to car owners/.commuters in westchester  There is one development whose  DGEIS comments are  due  feb 25 that call for 7000  parking spaces on the waterfront in 57 levels above ground at glenwood train station. water taxi would make  sense at this development, since the current daily commuter base of 1200 for these three stations would probably got to over 5000. i cant see how metro north could accommodate that crush at rush hour plus an additional 30 percent  overall with congestion pricing. it will be a couple years before the water taxi is economically viable in yonkers though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/comment-page-1/#comment-44598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/#comment-44598</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Subsidize ferries to make them competitive with other forms of mass transit&lt;/blockquote&gt;Sure, why not? Create hi-speed ferry lines from expensive waterfront neighborhoods like Bay Ridge, Midland Beach, and Whitestone to downtown, then pour in public money so the well-off people using them are only paying what they would on the subways and buses. I hear a dissonant note sounding amidst the orchestra of fiscal equity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Subsidize ferries to make them competitive with other forms of mass transit</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, why not? Create hi-speed ferry lines from expensive waterfront neighborhoods like Bay Ridge, Midland Beach, and Whitestone to downtown, then pour in public money so the well-off people using them are only paying what they would on the subways and buses. I hear a dissonant note sounding amidst the orchestra of fiscal equity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BicyclesOnly</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/comment-page-1/#comment-44595</link>
		<dc:creator>BicyclesOnly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/#comment-44595</guid>
		<description>Move Heliport:  I certainly hope they do.  One generally must squint to the point of closing one&#039;s eyes when passing by during a chopper take-off or landing, so copious are the ambient particles.  It doesn&#039;t belong in a &quot;park.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move Heliport:  I certainly hope they do.  One generally must squint to the point of closing one&#8217;s eyes when passing by during a chopper take-off or landing, so copious are the ambient particles.  It doesn&#8217;t belong in a &#8220;park.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/comment-page-1/#comment-44594</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/02/15/todays-headlines-340/#comment-44594</guid>
		<description>&quot;They will benefit and it will be an unanticipated benefit...Such a transaction, a so-called &quot;distress sale,&quot; is a further sign of an economy in trouble.&quot;

That&#039;s really the only hope for the budget -- transfer taxes on foreclosures, bankruptcies and distress sales.  It&#039;s the only way the MTA&#039;s real estate transfer tax revenue will fall from $1.6 billion to something close to $1.2 billion as planned, and not $400 million or less.  I can tell you that fourth quarter investment sales were down more than 25 percent in NYC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They will benefit and it will be an unanticipated benefit&#8230;Such a transaction, a so-called &#8220;distress sale,&#8221; is a further sign of an economy in trouble.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s really the only hope for the budget &#8212; transfer taxes on foreclosures, bankruptcies and distress sales.  It&#8217;s the only way the MTA&#8217;s real estate transfer tax revenue will fall from $1.6 billion to something close to $1.2 billion as planned, and not $400 million or less.  I can tell you that fourth quarter investment sales were down more than 25 percent in NYC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

