Comments on: As Anti-Pricing Arguments Fall Away, It’s Just Parking & Politics

By: Spud Spudly

Spud Spudly — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:37:19 +0000

I’ve posted plenty of anti-pricing arguments that nobody else seemed to agree with, but which nevertheless were not deleted.

I haven’t seen too many anti-pricing arguments “fall away” though. That’s just an attempt to create a false reality.

By: anon

anon — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:21:23 +0000

Larry L, I’m keeping a copy of your comment in #2 in case I ever try acting again. I’d use it as an audition monologue.

By: Angus Grieve-Smith

Angus Grieve-Smith — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:57:09 +0000

You’re full of it, GlennQ. Go back in the archives and you’ll find tons of anti-pricing arguments that haven’t been deleted, many of them from Lew Fidler, Corey Bearak and Richard Lipsky.

I’ve seen some of these posts of yours that got deleted, and it wasn’t because they were anti-pricing, it was because they were trolls, or else gratuitously insulting.

By: glennQ

glennQ — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:36:13 +0000

“Anti-Pricing arguments fall away” on streetsblog because they are deleted!
Unbelievably hypocritical and intellectually weak behavior IMO. Keep sticking your head in the sand streetblog…

By: Larry Littlefield

Larry Littlefield — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:36:13 +0000

Having been trained to provide facts to decisionmarkers in the public sector, I left when it sunk in that no one cared about facts, and decisions aren’t made. Deals are made, followed by non-decisions to continue to favor those with deals. So why bother producing the information? The best thing I ever did for the city was save it my salary.

It’s not about what, it’s about who.

By: Ace

Ace — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:10:37 +0000

Could this be made a ballot question?