<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London Reaps Pricing Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:07:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: socialscientist</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-35660</link>
		<dc:creator>socialscientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/#comment-35660</guid>
		<description>Good. Now, imagine no autos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. Now, imagine no autos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-35642</link>
		<dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/#comment-35642</guid>
		<description>That third point is an important one. Some anti-pricing folks have claimed that congestion is on the rise in London, which is true. But that&#039;s largely because in 2006 there was a highly abnormal amount of street construction in the London CBD (according to the report) which impacted congestion. What the report points out is that without congestion pricing things would be far worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That third point is an important one. Some anti-pricing folks have claimed that congestion is on the rise in London, which is true. But that's largely because in 2006 there was a highly abnormal amount of street construction in the London CBD (according to the report) which impacted congestion. What the report points out is that without congestion pricing things would be far worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Littlefield</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-35631</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Littlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/#comment-35631</guid>
		<description>This is the only &quot;study&quot; that matters.  One can make a model say just about anything, depending on the assumptions.  But the assumptions aren&#039;t any good without data, and the only data is from London and Stockholm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the only "study" that matters.  One can make a model say just about anything, depending on the assumptions.  But the assumptions aren't any good without data, and the only data is from London and Stockholm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-35626</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/16/london-reaps-pricing-benefits/#comment-35626</guid>
		<description>Obviously it&#039;s just a matter of time before London admits they made a mistake and goes back to the drawing board. What a waste of time and money! 

I hope in the future they will consider the full range of ideas put forth by our crack team of congestion pricing denial folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously it's just a matter of time before London admits they made a mistake and goes back to the drawing board. What a waste of time and money! </p>
<p>I hope in the future they will consider the full range of ideas put forth by our crack team of congestion pricing denial folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
