<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Details of the US DOT&#8217;s $354.5 Million Grant to NYC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bedraj Tripathy</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/comment-page-1/#comment-35462</link>
		<dc:creator>Bedraj Tripathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/#comment-35462</guid>
		<description>I think the good part here is that more money is for development of transporation infrastructure than a congestion pricing model. This will certainly help citizens and visitors move from own vehicles to Public Transportation. GOod work!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the good part here is that more money is for development of transporation infrastructure than a congestion pricing model. This will certainly help citizens and visitors move from own vehicles to Public Transportation. GOod work!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/comment-page-1/#comment-35455</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/#comment-35455</guid>
		<description>The original &quot;367 new buses&quot; figure was based on spending $258 million, which gives a figure of roughly $1.4 million per bus.  Based on that, with $213.6 million they could only buy 304 and a half buses.  For that last half, I suggest a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/07/24/the-new-parisian-street-scene/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;microbus&lt;/a&gt;.

Those missing 63 buses could have helped things, but I&#039;m happy to get 304 and a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original &#8220;367 new buses&#8221; figure was based on spending $258 million, which gives a figure of roughly $1.4 million per bus.  Based on that, with $213.6 million they could only buy 304 and a half buses.  For that last half, I suggest a <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/07/24/the-new-parisian-street-scene/" rel="nofollow">microbus</a>.</p>
<p>Those missing 63 buses could have helped things, but I&#8217;m happy to get 304 and a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/comment-page-1/#comment-35453</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/08/14/details-of-the-us-dots-3545-million-grant-to-nyc/#comment-35453</guid>
		<description>Technically, this seems to mean that nothing other than reduction of traffic &quot;through pricing as the principle mechanism&quot; is the only way to get and retain this money. The Port Authority could easily implement this on the NJ side - imagine a very high charge escalating at key times of entering or leaving the city... The only problem are the north and East sides of Manhattan. I say, just freaking toll the bridges entering all of Manhattan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, this seems to mean that nothing other than reduction of traffic &#8220;through pricing as the principle mechanism&#8221; is the only way to get and retain this money. The Port Authority could easily implement this on the NJ side &#8211; imagine a very high charge escalating at key times of entering or leaving the city&#8230; The only problem are the north and East sides of Manhattan. I say, just freaking toll the bridges entering all of Manhattan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

