<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger Launches Petititon to Revive Dormant Subway Tracks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:07:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-33621</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-33621</guid>
		<description>Great Comments folks!

Here is the history of express service on the Culver line as I remeber and also read.  Although there were express tracks built on what was then called the Smith Street IND they were not utilized for express service until the completion of the Christy Street connector in 1967.  Not sure if they ever used the middle track on the old Culver line.  From 1967 until about 1974 there was Rush Hour express service but was not well received by passangers then and it had a lot of complaints (because of reduced GG train service, remember the double lettered locals?!) and people did not like the extra flight of stairs at Bergen Street.  After the fiscal crises in the &#039;70s the TA ruled that this was one of the first service cut-backs with an intent to restore when they acquired the rolling stock to do it.  In the early 80&#039;s there was a fire at the Bergen Street interlock, knocking out switch capability between local and express tracks, which has yet to be repaired.  The MTA considerers this repair work low priority compared with all its immediate needs and is waiting for capital funding to fix it, (this is also way F trains crawl between Jay and Bergen Street).  In order to restore F train express service there would need to be total interlock rehabilitation at the Bergan Interlock and more rolling stock purchased to handle both local and express service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Comments folks!</p>
<p>Here is the history of express service on the Culver line as I remeber and also read.  Although there were express tracks built on what was then called the Smith Street IND they were not utilized for express service until the completion of the Christy Street connector in 1967.  Not sure if they ever used the middle track on the old Culver line.  From 1967 until about 1974 there was Rush Hour express service but was not well received by passangers then and it had a lot of complaints (because of reduced GG train service, remember the double lettered locals?!) and people did not like the extra flight of stairs at Bergen Street.  After the fiscal crises in the '70s the TA ruled that this was one of the first service cut-backs with an intent to restore when they acquired the rolling stock to do it.  In the early 80's there was a fire at the Bergen Street interlock, knocking out switch capability between local and express tracks, which has yet to be repaired.  The MTA considerers this repair work low priority compared with all its immediate needs and is waiting for capital funding to fix it, (this is also way F trains crawl between Jay and Bergen Street).  In order to restore F train express service there would need to be total interlock rehabilitation at the Bergan Interlock and more rolling stock purchased to handle both local and express service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-33115</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-33115</guid>
		<description>I disagree, Bobby.  The two-track tunnel is the same one (more or less) that the F and the V share between Second Avenue and Rockefeller Center, so why shouldn&#039;t they keep sharing it all the way through Jay Street?

If you extend the G to Church with the F express, you&#039;re just adding service; there are the same number of Fs at the express stops as before.  Anyone who would scream about extra trains that they don&#039;t need is overreacting.

My take on why the F express in Brooklyn died is that the MTA didn&#039;t want to pay to own and maintain enough cars to run it.  Can anyone confirm or deny this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, Bobby.  The two-track tunnel is the same one (more or less) that the F and the V share between Second Avenue and Rockefeller Center, so why shouldn't they keep sharing it all the way through Jay Street?</p>
<p>If you extend the G to Church with the F express, you're just adding service; there are the same number of Fs at the express stops as before.  Anyone who would scream about extra trains that they don't need is overreacting.</p>
<p>My take on why the F express in Brooklyn died is that the MTA didn't want to pay to own and maintain enough cars to run it.  Can anyone confirm or deny this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-33112</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 04:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-33112</guid>
		<description>Also keep in mind there is only a 2 track tunnel from Manhattan to Brooklyn - running V trains through there means fewer Fs. The G will be a real problem since it can&#039;t turn at 4 Ave  - the time to move switches and reverse direction is too long. One other option is to extend the G to Church with the F express - but the people who would have to transfer to get to manhattan would scream.

Any time you start having to move switches to merger or diverge service you loose a lot of capacity. That&#039;s probably the main reason the F express in Brooklyn died.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also keep in mind there is only a 2 track tunnel from Manhattan to Brooklyn - running V trains through there means fewer Fs. The G will be a real problem since it can't turn at 4 Ave  - the time to move switches and reverse direction is too long. One other option is to extend the G to Church with the F express - but the people who would have to transfer to get to manhattan would scream.</p>
<p>Any time you start having to move switches to merger or diverge service you loose a lot of capacity. That's probably the main reason the F express in Brooklyn died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Blue PD</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-33053</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Blue PD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-33053</guid>
		<description>Good campaign idea, good luck with it.  We have to wonder what Bloomberg is thinking, or maybe they mostly just want a new tax.

Why doesn&#039;t he do anything about this?

Pershing Square Restaurant blocks Park Avenue going South at 42nd St. This Causes Massive Congestion &amp; Air Pollution! But Does It Bother NYC Mayor Mike &#039;&quot;Congestion Pricing Tax&quot; Bloomberg? Click here to see the map!

Check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good campaign idea, good luck with it.  We have to wonder what Bloomberg is thinking, or maybe they mostly just want a new tax.</p>
<p>Why doesn't he do anything about this?</p>
<p>Pershing Square Restaurant blocks Park Avenue going South at 42nd St. This Causes Massive Congestion &amp; Air Pollution! But Does It Bother NYC Mayor Mike '"Congestion Pricing Tax" Bloomberg? Click here to see the map!</p>
<p>Check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cairl</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-33009</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cairl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-33009</guid>
		<description>First, a correction to my last post.  NYCT would have to restore crossovers south of Kings Highway station to enable the service pattern I described.

Answering Frank Smith&#039;s question, there are 3 mainline tracks south of Church Avenue, plus &quot;tail&quot; tracks beneath and south of Church Avenue station for storage and turn-backs.  The service pattern I described would enable F express service in peak direction only, i.e. toward Manhattan in the morning rush and toward Coney Island in the evening rush.  The #5, #6 and #7 lines have exactly such peak-direction express service on 3-track lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, a correction to my last post.  NYCT would have to restore crossovers south of Kings Highway station to enable the service pattern I described.</p>
<p>Answering Frank Smith's question, there are 3 mainline tracks south of Church Avenue, plus "tail" tracks beneath and south of Church Avenue station for storage and turn-backs.  The service pattern I described would enable F express service in peak direction only, i.e. toward Manhattan in the morning rush and toward Coney Island in the evening rush.  The #5, #6 and #7 lines have exactly such peak-direction express service on 3-track lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-33000</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-33000</guid>
		<description>How many tracks are there between Church and Kings Highway?  I was under the impression that the Express tracks (4 track configuration) was only until the Culver Ramp just after Church, after which there are only 3 tracks for the rest of the Culver Line on the elevated section of the line.  It seems more likely that the previous suggestion of Express to Church and local thereafter is more achievable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many tracks are there between Church and Kings Highway?  I was under the impression that the Express tracks (4 track configuration) was only until the Culver Ramp just after Church, after which there are only 3 tracks for the rest of the Culver Line on the elevated section of the line.  It seems more likely that the previous suggestion of Express to Church and local thereafter is more achievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cairl</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-32987</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cairl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-32987</guid>
		<description>Existing track layout up and down the line limits NYCT&#039;s options, as well as insufficient rolling stock (cars).  The best option, one that really would reprise a 1970s service pattern and would require no track changes, would be for the G to run local to Church Avenue, V to run local to Kings Highway, F to run express Jay Street to Kings Highway (intermediate stops at 7th Avenue, Church Avenue, 18th Avenue) and local Kings Highway - Coney Island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Existing track layout up and down the line limits NYCT's options, as well as insufficient rolling stock (cars).  The best option, one that really would reprise a 1970s service pattern and would require no track changes, would be for the G to run local to Church Avenue, V to run local to Kings Highway, F to run express Jay Street to Kings Highway (intermediate stops at 7th Avenue, Church Avenue, 18th Avenue) and local Kings Highway - Coney Island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-32980</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-32980</guid>
		<description>Sam, why would there be any difference at Carroll, Bergen or Smith and 9th?  These would all be local stops the way I envision it. The express F would run on the express tracks, and the V and G would continue to share the local at these stops.

And thanks Susan, ddartley and Aaron for the kind words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, why would there be any difference at Carroll, Bergen or Smith and 9th?  These would all be local stops the way I envision it. The express F would run on the express tracks, and the V and G would continue to share the local at these stops.</p>
<p>And thanks Susan, ddartley and Aaron for the kind words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-32977</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-32977</guid>
		<description>Good point, Sam.  Hm, hm.  On some of the blogs people are discussing whether or not to rehabe the express tracks under Court Street or to have all the F/V trains run local through Bergen and Carroll.  If the F/V trains run local, then the MTA could rehab the lower-level platforms at Bergen Street and have the G terminate there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Sam.  Hm, hm.  On some of the blogs people are discussing whether or not to rehabe the express tracks under Court Street or to have all the F/V trains run local through Bergen and Carroll.  If the F/V trains run local, then the MTA could rehab the lower-level platforms at Bergen Street and have the G terminate there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-32975</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-32975</guid>
		<description>I am all for an express F line but people neglect the fact that this would royally screw G train service. i.e. it would be non-existant at carroll, bergen and smith &amp; 9th</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for an express F line but people neglect the fact that this would royally screw G train service. i.e. it would be non-existant at carroll, bergen and smith &amp; 9th</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-32966</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-32966</guid>
		<description>Kudos not only to Mr. Reilly but to Second Avenue Sagas for &lt;a href=&quot;http://secondavenuesagas.com/2007/06/22/petition-for-f-express-service-picking-up-steam/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bringing this up&lt;/a&gt; as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos not only to Mr. Reilly but to Second Avenue Sagas for <a href="http://secondavenuesagas.com/2007/06/22/petition-for-f-express-service-picking-up-steam/" rel="nofollow">bringing this up</a> as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-32965</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-32965</guid>
		<description>Susan--if only a strong gust of wind had blown through at that moment!

Bravo, bravo to Mr. Reilly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan--if only a strong gust of wind had blown through at that moment!</p>
<p>Bravo, bravo to Mr. Reilly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/comment-page-1/#comment-32964</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/22/petititon-to-enhance-subway-service-in-brooklyn/#comment-32964</guid>
		<description>Is he like the anti-Moses ( http://www.trincoll.edu/~jtarzi/Robert%20Moses.jpg) or something in this photo? The guys looks like he means business.

&quot;An express F ran between Jay Street-Borough Hall and Kings Highway during rush hours through the 1970s, when it was discontinued for track repair work.&quot;

So they closed it in 1970 to repair it and it&#039;s still not ready? We&#039;re going to be paying for all the neglect of city infrastructure trough the 70s and 80s for many years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is he like the anti-Moses ( <a href="http://www.trincoll.edu/~jtarzi/Robert%20Moses.jpg)" rel="nofollow">http://www.trincoll.edu/~jtarzi/Robert%20Moses.jpg)</a> or something in this photo? The guys looks like he means business.</p>
<p>"An express F ran between Jay Street-Borough Hall and Kings Highway during rush hours through the 1970s, when it was discontinued for track repair work."</p>
<p>So they closed it in 1970 to repair it and it's still not ready? We're going to be paying for all the neglect of city infrastructure trough the 70s and 80s for many years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
