<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/comment-page-1/#comment-32479</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/#comment-32479</guid>
		<description>The self-selected responses to a Crain&#039;s online poll merit a news story?  Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The self-selected responses to a Crain&#8217;s online poll merit a news story?  Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efficiency Nut</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/comment-page-1/#comment-32478</link>
		<dc:creator>Efficiency Nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/#comment-32478</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else think that NY Times article was the most inane piece of rubbish that has been reported by any of the major papers since pricing was announced on April 19th???

I was disgusted.  All the valid talking points and briefing memos be damned, I&#039;m gonna go out and ask a bunch of drivers if they want to pay for something they currently get for free.  OMG!  What a surprise, the drivers don&#039;t like the idea.  What groundbreaking news!  

Where&#039;s the other side of the &quot;fair and balanced&quot; approach that they usually take (i.e. giving McCaffrey&#039;s bogus front Anti-Congestion Tax group a free quoation)?  Where are the interviews with pedestrians, transit riders, and cyclists, the primary beneficiaries of the plan, the 95% of NYC who will love pricing.

But I digress.  Look unicorns!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else think that NY Times article was the most inane piece of rubbish that has been reported by any of the major papers since pricing was announced on April 19th???</p>
<p>I was disgusted.  All the valid talking points and briefing memos be damned, I&#8217;m gonna go out and ask a bunch of drivers if they want to pay for something they currently get for free.  OMG!  What a surprise, the drivers don&#8217;t like the idea.  What groundbreaking news!  </p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the other side of the &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221; approach that they usually take (i.e. giving McCaffrey&#8217;s bogus front Anti-Congestion Tax group a free quoation)?  Where are the interviews with pedestrians, transit riders, and cyclists, the primary beneficiaries of the plan, the 95% of NYC who will love pricing.</p>
<p>But I digress.  Look unicorns!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne (www.sustainableflatbush.org)</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/comment-page-1/#comment-32477</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne (www.sustainableflatbush.org)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/#comment-32477</guid>
		<description>unfortunate that the Newsday reporter in the new stations article confuses congestion pricing with the entire PlaNYC program. it would be unfortunate if that kind of bad research and reporting leads congestion pricing opponents to resist the entire plan because they don&#039;t understand the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunate that the Newsday reporter in the new stations article confuses congestion pricing with the entire PlaNYC program. it would be unfortunate if that kind of bad research and reporting leads congestion pricing opponents to resist the entire plan because they don&#8217;t understand the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/comment-page-1/#comment-32476</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/#comment-32476</guid>
		<description>Joe Wright&#039;s idea is to reduce congestion by increasing automobile parking? That&#039;s the most backwards thinking I&#039;ve ever heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Wright&#8217;s idea is to reduce congestion by increasing automobile parking? That&#8217;s the most backwards thinking I&#8217;ve ever heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Varone</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/comment-page-1/#comment-32474</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Varone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/#comment-32474</guid>
		<description>&quot;This fall, the Parks Department and the U.S. Forest Service will use computer modeling to study which trees best fight pollution.&quot; - Post

not bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This fall, the Parks Department and the U.S. Forest Service will use computer modeling to study which trees best fight pollution.&#8221; &#8211; Post</p>
<p>not bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/comment-page-1/#comment-32471</link>
		<dc:creator>v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/11/todays-headlines-176/#comment-32471</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Another respondent, Joe Wright, argued that much &gt;&gt;of the congestion is caused by bus traffic and &gt;&gt;the lack of available parking in Manhattan. &gt;&gt;&quot;This is just another tax on New Yorkers,&quot; he &gt;&gt;said. &quot;The city brought this problem on itself &gt;&gt;by forbidding the construction of parking lots &gt;&gt;some years ago.

Uh, no, Joe, traffic isn&#039;t caused by &quot;bus congestion&quot; and a lack of services for drivers. If you had ever been to a great city outside of New York, you&#039;d understand that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Another respondent, Joe Wright, argued that much &gt;&gt;of the congestion is caused by bus traffic and &gt;&gt;the lack of available parking in Manhattan. &gt;&gt;&#8221;This is just another tax on New Yorkers,&#8221; he &gt;&gt;said. &#8220;The city brought this problem on itself &gt;&gt;by forbidding the construction of parking lots &gt;&gt;some years ago.</p>
<p>Uh, no, Joe, traffic isn&#8217;t caused by &#8220;bus congestion&#8221; and a lack of services for drivers. If you had ever been to a great city outside of New York, you&#8217;d understand that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

