<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London Finds &#8220;No Adverse Impact&#8221; Outside Charging Zone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/04/london-study-shows-no-adverse-impact-outside-charging-zone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/04/london-study-shows-no-adverse-impact-outside-charging-zone/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/04/london-study-shows-no-adverse-impact-outside-charging-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-32263</link>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/06/04/london-study-shows-no-adverse-impact-outside-charging-zone/#comment-32263</guid>
		<description>I meant to comment on the park-and-ride topic when it first surfaced. The whole idea does not make sense to me and London confirms it. It defies the logic of motoring in the first place- the convenience of getting from point a to b in luxurious comfort using streets paid for by the public, etc. When the convenience is taken away- drive, park, take subway- people will use the more convenient method. There are many options in NYC- the cong. charge “tax on the working class” cheerleaders should keep in mind we live in a city where anyone can travel virtually anywhere for $2. I know that people do park and ride in the far flung suburbs, but that is because they don’t have any other options- all of their trips generally involve a car. I assume these people make up a high proportion of the people currently driving into the city because it is more convenient to them than taking a train, bus, etc. They may still do that and cough up the extra few dollars a day, but I would also guess that the park and ride lots in places like Syosset and Trenton will fill up- good news for NYC as this means fewer high speed death machines on our streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to comment on the park-and-ride topic when it first surfaced. The whole idea does not make sense to me and London confirms it. It defies the logic of motoring in the first place- the convenience of getting from point a to b in luxurious comfort using streets paid for by the public, etc. When the convenience is taken away- drive, park, take subway- people will use the more convenient method. There are many options in NYC- the cong. charge “tax on the working class” cheerleaders should keep in mind we live in a city where anyone can travel virtually anywhere for $2. I know that people do park and ride in the far flung suburbs, but that is because they don’t have any other options- all of their trips generally involve a car. I assume these people make up a high proportion of the people currently driving into the city because it is more convenient to them than taking a train, bus, etc. They may still do that and cough up the extra few dollars a day, but I would also guess that the park and ride lots in places like Syosset and Trenton will fill up- good news for NYC as this means fewer high speed death machines on our streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

