<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA.Streetsblog: The Joy of Poor Circulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bicking</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/comment-page-1/#comment-32153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bicking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 17:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/#comment-32153</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t entirely understand the problem with one way streets.  In Chicago most side streets are one way, and I rather like it -- it keeps the street width down, while giving enough room so that bikes and cars can share the road easily (including bikes going the wrong way), people can double park, and the kind of flexibility you need for a multiuse road.  And multiuse roads seem like at least part of the positive aspect of congestion -- roads that aren&#039;t just for moving through, but for loading and unloading, for pedestrians and bikes and the occasional motorized wheelchair or a homeless guy with a shopping cart.

Larger one-way roads help people moving through the community and punish people traveling short distances inside the community.  But on small roads I don&#039;t think the logic applies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't entirely understand the problem with one way streets.  In Chicago most side streets are one way, and I rather like it -- it keeps the street width down, while giving enough room so that bikes and cars can share the road easily (including bikes going the wrong way), people can double park, and the kind of flexibility you need for a multiuse road.  And multiuse roads seem like at least part of the positive aspect of congestion -- roads that aren't just for moving through, but for loading and unloading, for pedestrians and bikes and the occasional motorized wheelchair or a homeless guy with a shopping cart.</p>
<p>Larger one-way roads help people moving through the community and punish people traveling short distances inside the community.  But on small roads I don't think the logic applies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaB</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/comment-page-1/#comment-32142</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/#comment-32142</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, this is Vancouver&#039;s approach too - embracing congestion as part of vibrant streets.   Good article on it here: http://www.vanmag.com/articles/07jun/Drivinglessons.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, this is Vancouver's approach too - embracing congestion as part of vibrant streets.   Good article on it here: <a href="http://www.vanmag.com/articles/07jun/Drivinglessons.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanmag.com/articles/07jun/Drivinglessons.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/comment-page-1/#comment-32118</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/#comment-32118</guid>
		<description>D, I was also concerned by the phrase &quot;increased speeds.&quot;  But the current speeds are so low that I don&#039;t think the increase would make things that much less safe.  For example, once (back in &#039;95 or &#039;97, I think) I rented a truck in Chelsea to move some stuff in Brooklyn, and it took me half an hour to get from 16th and Ninth to 16th and Third.

Still, I&#039;d like to see some data.  In areas where the speeds are projected to increase too much, the streets could be calmed by widening sidewalks, installing bus lanes or making the streets two-way.  The timing could be adjusted too: West End Avenue is a disaster, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D, I was also concerned by the phrase "increased speeds."  But the current speeds are so low that I don't think the increase would make things that much less safe.  For example, once (back in '95 or '97, I think) I rented a truck in Chelsea to move some stuff in Brooklyn, and it took me half an hour to get from 16th and Ninth to 16th and Third.</p>
<p>Still, I'd like to see some data.  In areas where the speeds are projected to increase too much, the streets could be calmed by widening sidewalks, installing bus lanes or making the streets two-way.  The timing could be adjusted too: West End Avenue is a disaster, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Raisman</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/comment-page-1/#comment-32112</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Raisman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 01:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/#comment-32112</guid>
		<description>Here is an inspiring video about Houten, The Netherlands where the entire city is designed with the type of circulation the Urban Man seems to be getting at.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4QT5rvnfS0

Enjoy.
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an inspiring video about Houten, The Netherlands where the entire city is designed with the type of circulation the Urban Man seems to be getting at.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4QT5rvnfS0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4QT5rvnfS0</a></p>
<p>Enjoy.<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/comment-page-1/#comment-32111</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/#comment-32111</guid>
		<description>&quot;Urbanists have known for decades that the increased traffic speed of one-way streets makes walking less appealing. And they know that whenever circulation improves, people shop further, work further, and slowly abandon the love of neighborhood.&quot;

THESE are some reasons I have always been hesitant about congestion pricing!  Beware!  Seriously, if NYC adopts pricing, we must also do more, like reduce the speed limit on the books, or seriously physically calm our streets.  One of the big selling points of congestion pricing is that it increases the overall speed of traffic.  Hello, collisions and death?  WTF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Urbanists have known for decades that the increased traffic speed of one-way streets makes walking less appealing. And they know that whenever circulation improves, people shop further, work further, and slowly abandon the love of neighborhood."</p>
<p>THESE are some reasons I have always been hesitant about congestion pricing!  Beware!  Seriously, if NYC adopts pricing, we must also do more, like reduce the speed limit on the books, or seriously physically calm our streets.  One of the big selling points of congestion pricing is that it increases the overall speed of traffic.  Hello, collisions and death?  WTF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubrayj02</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/comment-page-1/#comment-32108</link>
		<dc:creator>ubrayj02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 22:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/30/lastreetsblog-the-joy-of-poor-circulation/#comment-32108</guid>
		<description>As a fellow Angeleno, I can only dream that one day we&#039;ll de-emphasize the automobile enough to let our old commercial corridors thrive once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a fellow Angeleno, I can only dream that one day we'll de-emphasize the automobile enough to let our old commercial corridors thrive once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
