<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/10/todays-headlines-155/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/10/todays-headlines-155/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/10/todays-headlines-155/comment-page-1/#comment-31607</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 04:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/10/todays-headlines-155/#comment-31607</guid>
		<description>Robert Frank&#039;s rebate plan is an idea only an economist could love.  Vouchers that people can sell?  That practically guarantees a minimum amount of cars on the road, and would be a strong deterrent to carpooling.  

As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/11/congestion-pricing-foes-will-go-into-attack-mode/#comment-31601&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aaron pointed out&lt;/a&gt;, the transit improvements &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; a kick-back to the poorest New Yorkers.  The only way I&#039;d support these rebates is if they came in the form of unlimited-ride Metrocards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Frank&#8217;s rebate plan is an idea only an economist could love.  Vouchers that people can sell?  That practically guarantees a minimum amount of cars on the road, and would be a strong deterrent to carpooling.  </p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/11/congestion-pricing-foes-will-go-into-attack-mode/#comment-31601" rel="nofollow">Aaron pointed out</a>, the transit improvements <i>are</i> a kick-back to the poorest New Yorkers.  The only way I&#8217;d support these rebates is if they came in the form of unlimited-ride Metrocards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian D</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/10/todays-headlines-155/comment-page-1/#comment-31548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/05/10/todays-headlines-155/#comment-31548</guid>
		<description>RE: Oakland Bike Lane Removed for Auto Traffic

So, if the problem is that cars are overwhelming a neighborhood because of last week&#039;s highway collapse, then am I crazy to think that the wrong idea is to discourage non-auto travel?

At least when NYC prepared to be overwhelmed by auto traffic in the wake of the 12/05 transit strike, the reaction was to discourage the cars, not the bikes or walkers....that seems pretty logical!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Oakland Bike Lane Removed for Auto Traffic</p>
<p>So, if the problem is that cars are overwhelming a neighborhood because of last week&#8217;s highway collapse, then am I crazy to think that the wrong idea is to discourage non-auto travel?</p>
<p>At least when NYC prepared to be overwhelmed by auto traffic in the wake of the 12/05 transit strike, the reaction was to discourage the cars, not the bikes or walkers&#8230;.that seems pretty logical!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

