<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/18/todays-headlines-139/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/18/todays-headlines-139/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Grieve-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/18/todays-headlines-139/comment-page-1/#comment-30926</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Grieve-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/18/todays-headlines-139/#comment-30926</guid>
		<description>The seaplane idea is a little too creative.  As long as we&#039;re thinking outside the box, I want a dirigible-port in the Sunnyside Yards.

Seriously, Bloomberg thinks that seaplanes are &quot;environmentally friendly&quot; (the Sun&#039;s wording) because you can land outside of the city and taxi in?  So that means his idea of environmentally friendly is &quot;out of sight, out of mind&quot;?  What about the gas consumption and pollution?

How much is he thinking of spending to subsidize seaplanes?  And how much speed or capacity improvement could we get on the Northeast corridor with that money?  If we spent it on THE Tunnel instead (taking M&amp;E trains out of the current tunnel), that would allow us to double the number of trains to DC.  How many seaplanes is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The seaplane idea is a little too creative.  As long as we&#8217;re thinking outside the box, I want a dirigible-port in the Sunnyside Yards.</p>
<p>Seriously, Bloomberg thinks that seaplanes are &#8220;environmentally friendly&#8221; (the Sun&#8217;s wording) because you can land outside of the city and taxi in?  So that means his idea of environmentally friendly is &#8220;out of sight, out of mind&#8221;?  What about the gas consumption and pollution?</p>
<p>How much is he thinking of spending to subsidize seaplanes?  And how much speed or capacity improvement could we get on the Northeast corridor with that money?  If we spent it on THE Tunnel instead (taking M&amp;E trains out of the current tunnel), that would allow us to double the number of trains to DC.  How many seaplanes is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/18/todays-headlines-139/comment-page-1/#comment-30895</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/18/todays-headlines-139/#comment-30895</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad the Corzine story is not only going to be a seatbelt story.  I&#039;m glad it&#039;s drawing attention to the danger of stupidly permissible high speeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad the Corzine story is not only going to be a seatbelt story.  I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s drawing attention to the danger of stupidly permissible high speeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

