<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle Master Plan Aims to Keep Cyclists Safe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/11/seattle-master-plan-aims-to-keep-cyclists-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/11/seattle-master-plan-aims-to-keep-cyclists-safe/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: protected</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/11/seattle-master-plan-aims-to-keep-cyclists-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-30711</link>
		<dc:creator>protected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/11/seattle-master-plan-aims-to-keep-cyclists-safe/#comment-30711</guid>
		<description>According to the plan Seattle only has 39 miles of &quot;trails&quot; (Class 1s).  They plan on increasing that to 41 in the short term and only 59 in the long term.  Does anyone think Seattle will be a bike friendly city without protected lanes? Are they being slammed by the bike people there for not having vision?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the plan Seattle only has 39 miles of &#8220;trails&#8221; (Class 1s).  They plan on increasing that to 41 in the short term and only 59 in the long term.  Does anyone think Seattle will be a bike friendly city without protected lanes? Are they being slammed by the bike people there for not having vision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

