<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/comment-page-1/#comment-29453</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/#comment-29453</guid>
		<description>The proposal to sell the New Jersey Turnpike -- or turn it over to the state pension board -- strikes me as radically hostile to good public policy.

Either a private owner or a pension-fund manager would be motivated -- if not obligated -- to enhance revenue, which could only mean doing everything they could to increase traffic volumes.

The state&#039;s interest in increased tolls would could at least be  offset by environmental and other concerns.

There&#039;s a reason that some tasks are better suited to be government run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposal to sell the New Jersey Turnpike &#8212; or turn it over to the state pension board &#8212; strikes me as radically hostile to good public policy.</p>
<p>Either a private owner or a pension-fund manager would be motivated &#8212; if not obligated &#8212; to enhance revenue, which could only mean doing everything they could to increase traffic volumes.</p>
<p>The state&#8217;s interest in increased tolls would could at least be  offset by environmental and other concerns.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason that some tasks are better suited to be government run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mork</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/comment-page-1/#comment-29442</link>
		<dc:creator>mork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/#comment-29442</guid>
		<description>Jeff Rossen of ABC needs a course in copspeak.

The &quot;Illegal Parking&quot; article says:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
According to a recent survey, 77 percent of people with placards use them illegally. So, I asked the NYPD what they are doing to stop this. They told me, we discipline ourselves.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rossen interprets this to mean that &quot;a cop . . . will be punished at work&quot; for placard abuse.  But actually &quot;we discipline ourselves&quot; means that there will be no consequences for cops parking illegally, just like there never has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Rossen of ABC needs a course in copspeak.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Illegal Parking&#8221; article says:</p>
<blockquote><p>
According to a recent survey, 77 percent of people with placards use them illegally. So, I asked the NYPD what they are doing to stop this. They told me, we discipline ourselves.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Rossen interprets this to mean that &#8220;a cop . . . will be punished at work&#8221; for placard abuse.  But actually &#8220;we discipline ourselves&#8221; means that there will be no consequences for cops parking illegally, just like there never has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/comment-page-1/#comment-29406</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/todays-headlines-108/#comment-29406</guid>
		<description>NYDN: &quot;A bicylcist [sic] swerving into traffic on Roosevelt Ave. in Queens was struck and killed by a car yesterday, police said.&quot;

Firstly, this is logically impossible, as bicyclists are constantly reminded that they ARE traffic. Secondly, can this poor dead guy get an &quot;allegedly,&quot; or is that just for bad drivers and other criminals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYDN: &#8220;A bicylcist [sic] swerving into traffic on Roosevelt Ave. in Queens was struck and killed by a car yesterday, police said.&#8221;</p>
<p>Firstly, this is logically impossible, as bicyclists are constantly reminded that they ARE traffic. Secondly, can this poor dead guy get an &#8220;allegedly,&#8221; or is that just for bad drivers and other criminals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

