<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City Council Set To Vote on Pedicabs Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lala</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/comment-page-1/#comment-29470</link>
		<dc:creator>lala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/#comment-29470</guid>
		<description>This is completely ridiculous.  Either there&#039;s a lot of ignorance on the City Council (very likely), or some folks are getting paid for political favors.  Quinn and Bloomberg are of course hypocrites.  Sue &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is completely ridiculous.  Either there&#8217;s a lot of ignorance on the City Council (very likely), or some folks are getting paid for political favors.  Quinn and Bloomberg are of course hypocrites.  Sue &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/comment-page-1/#comment-29463</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/#comment-29463</guid>
		<description>I think this quote from Caroline at TA in the NY1 report should be repeated over and over:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;We think that [City Council is] anti-environment, anti-small business and completely inconsistent with the mayor&#039;s long-term sustainability initiative, Plan NYC,&quot; said Caroline Samponaro of Transportation Alternatives.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&amp;aid=67203</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this quote from Caroline at TA in the NY1 report should be repeated over and over:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We think that [City Council is] anti-environment, anti-small business and completely inconsistent with the mayor&#8217;s long-term sustainability initiative, Plan NYC,&#8221; said Caroline Samponaro of Transportation Alternatives.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&#038;aid=67203" rel="nofollow">http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&#038;aid=67203</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddartley</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/comment-page-1/#comment-29459</link>
		<dc:creator>ddartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/#comment-29459</guid>
		<description>Under this bill, cops or certain city agencies can order pedicab operators to scram if certain exigent or exceptional circumstances exist, including, but not limited to, &quot;unusually heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic.&quot;

Lucky for the environmental good guys (i.e., pedicabs, as opposed to cars), in Times Square, one of pedicabs&#039; main loci, there is no such thing as &quot;unusually heavy...traffic,&quot; and &quot;heavy traffic&quot; is NEVER &quot;exceptional&quot; in Times Square!  I&#039;m serious.  Heavy auto/ped traffic there is the norm, so, seriously, it should not be cited by a cop or City agency as a reason to kick pedicabs out from that area.

I haven&#039;t read the whole thing (and I haven&#039;t kept up with the issue, nor have I read the latest draft of the originally superior bill, 75), and so I don&#039;t know if I&#039;ve quite come around to supporting Int. 331, but there are two things in it that I think are improvements over earlier drafts:

1. the cap of 325 is supposed to sunset after two years!  I know, there shouldn&#039;t be a cap at all unless yellow cabs&#039; numbers are also cut, but it&#039;s a sign of some improved hope!

2. there is no longer the asinine, infuriating &quot;no pedicabs in Central Park&quot; provision.

In my so-far-superficial reading of the bill, I pick up two more good laughs:  

1. &quot;The pedicab vehicle itself is manufactured in various incarnations, including a version called the &#039;party bike[.]&#039;&quot;  Get out of town.  Pedicabs are transportation; the &quot;party bike&quot; is a teenagers&#039; novelty.  Uh, seriously, I mean it, get out of town.  You have no place drafting legislation if you think the party bike is a pedicab.

2. If the law is passed, various City agencies will together produce a report that discusses, among other things, the law&#039;s success in &quot;minimizing the the effects of pedicabs on traffic and congestion.&quot;  Well, pedicabs&#039; effect on traffic is to make it more efficient.  So it&#039;s a pity the law seeks to MINIMIZE that effect.  

The ubiquity of this particular aspect of Conventional Thinking is a real blight on humanity:  something&#039;s ingenious?  Fun?  Entrepreneurial?  Efficient?  Superior?  And just a little too different from the older thing it&#039;s competing with?  KILL IT!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under this bill, cops or certain city agencies can order pedicab operators to scram if certain exigent or exceptional circumstances exist, including, but not limited to, &#8220;unusually heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lucky for the environmental good guys (i.e., pedicabs, as opposed to cars), in Times Square, one of pedicabs&#8217; main loci, there is no such thing as &#8220;unusually heavy&#8230;traffic,&#8221; and &#8220;heavy traffic&#8221; is NEVER &#8220;exceptional&#8221; in Times Square!  I&#8217;m serious.  Heavy auto/ped traffic there is the norm, so, seriously, it should not be cited by a cop or City agency as a reason to kick pedicabs out from that area.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the whole thing (and I haven&#8217;t kept up with the issue, nor have I read the latest draft of the originally superior bill, 75), and so I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ve quite come around to supporting Int. 331, but there are two things in it that I think are improvements over earlier drafts:</p>
<p>1. the cap of 325 is supposed to sunset after two years!  I know, there shouldn&#8217;t be a cap at all unless yellow cabs&#8217; numbers are also cut, but it&#8217;s a sign of some improved hope!</p>
<p>2. there is no longer the asinine, infuriating &#8220;no pedicabs in Central Park&#8221; provision.</p>
<p>In my so-far-superficial reading of the bill, I pick up two more good laughs:  </p>
<p>1. &#8220;The pedicab vehicle itself is manufactured in various incarnations, including a version called the &#8216;party bike[.]&#8216;&#8221;  Get out of town.  Pedicabs are transportation; the &#8220;party bike&#8221; is a teenagers&#8217; novelty.  Uh, seriously, I mean it, get out of town.  You have no place drafting legislation if you think the party bike is a pedicab.</p>
<p>2. If the law is passed, various City agencies will together produce a report that discusses, among other things, the law&#8217;s success in &#8220;minimizing the the effects of pedicabs on traffic and congestion.&#8221;  Well, pedicabs&#8217; effect on traffic is to make it more efficient.  So it&#8217;s a pity the law seeks to MINIMIZE that effect.  </p>
<p>The ubiquity of this particular aspect of Conventional Thinking is a real blight on humanity:  something&#8217;s ingenious?  Fun?  Entrepreneurial?  Efficient?  Superior?  And just a little too different from the older thing it&#8217;s competing with?  KILL IT!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Varone</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/comment-page-1/#comment-29440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Varone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/#comment-29440</guid>
		<description>Thanks Will, fixed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Will, fixed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WIll</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/comment-page-1/#comment-29439</link>
		<dc:creator>WIll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/#comment-29439</guid>
		<description>Can you patch my typo on ChristmasS

thanks for picking up this shameful story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you patch my typo on ChristmasS</p>
<p>thanks for picking up this shameful story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/comment-page-1/#comment-29437</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/#comment-29437</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/comment-page-1/#comment-29435</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/28/city-council-set-to-vote-on-pedicabs-today/#comment-29435</guid>
		<description>i can see the headlines now:

OUT-OF-WORK PEDICABS ROBBING TOURISTS IN NEW CRIME WAVE

(j/k...but this new bill is nothing to laugh about)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can see the headlines now:</p>
<p>OUT-OF-WORK PEDICABS ROBBING TOURISTS IN NEW CRIME WAVE</p>
<p>(j/k&#8230;but this new bill is nothing to laugh about)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

