<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kate Ascher: New York City&#8217;s Next DOT Commissioner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian D</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/comment-page-1/#comment-29176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/#comment-29176</guid>
		<description>Funny - some of us downtowners were talking recently about PED LOS and VEHICLE interference (after sitting through DOT&#039;s testimony on Intro. 199 and the subjects of LOS and PED interference).

I agree - the PED LOS should not be measured just by density, it is also affected greatly by activity (it is impossible to move through the jam created by SoHo&#039;s vendors, for example).

High-quality illustrations in Ascher&#039;s book - they sure might look nice if they were implemented in real-life, don&#039;t ya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny &#8211; some of us downtowners were talking recently about PED LOS and VEHICLE interference (after sitting through DOT&#8217;s testimony on Intro. 199 and the subjects of LOS and PED interference).</p>
<p>I agree &#8211; the PED LOS should not be measured just by density, it is also affected greatly by activity (it is impossible to move through the jam created by SoHo&#8217;s vendors, for example).</p>
<p>High-quality illustrations in Ascher&#8217;s book &#8211; they sure might look nice if they were implemented in real-life, don&#8217;t ya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Dotmolsky</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/comment-page-1/#comment-29161</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Dotmolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/#comment-29161</guid>
		<description>So first it was Joan MacDonald, then it was Janette Sadik-Kahn, now Kate Ascher.  What I surmise from this is that someone who contributes to Streetsblog sits outside Doctoroff&#039;s office and thinks every woman who walks in is being interviewed for the DOT Commissioner spot.

Having no inside information on this particular horse race, I can&#039;t help but think of the Crain&#039;s article a couple of weeks back that said all the high powered names being bandied about (including two of the above) aren&#039;t interested because they all earn more elsewhere.

The only inside information I&#039;ve got is that DOT Commissioner is a pretty unappealing job for anyone actually wants to do something about mobility in NY, be paid a salary commensurate with his/her market value, or avoid being sucked into a scandal not of your making.

What do you think, oh person who sits outside Dan&#039;s door?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So first it was Joan MacDonald, then it was Janette Sadik-Kahn, now Kate Ascher.  What I surmise from this is that someone who contributes to Streetsblog sits outside Doctoroff&#8217;s office and thinks every woman who walks in is being interviewed for the DOT Commissioner spot.</p>
<p>Having no inside information on this particular horse race, I can&#8217;t help but think of the Crain&#8217;s article a couple of weeks back that said all the high powered names being bandied about (including two of the above) aren&#8217;t interested because they all earn more elsewhere.</p>
<p>The only inside information I&#8217;ve got is that DOT Commissioner is a pretty unappealing job for anyone actually wants to do something about mobility in NY, be paid a salary commensurate with his/her market value, or avoid being sucked into a scandal not of your making.</p>
<p>What do you think, oh person who sits outside Dan&#8217;s door?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/comment-page-1/#comment-29158</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/#comment-29158</guid>
		<description>Sounds really promising.  

My only nit-picky comment is about Pedestrian Level of Service: I&#039;m not sure the analogy to traffic LOS holds up here, since emptier sidewalks aren&#039;t necessarily better that busier ones (especially in terms of vibrancy and safety).  

Of course, any focus on the pedestrian realm is welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds really promising.  </p>
<p>My only nit-picky comment is about Pedestrian Level of Service: I&#8217;m not sure the analogy to traffic LOS holds up here, since emptier sidewalks aren&#8217;t necessarily better that busier ones (especially in terms of vibrancy and safety).  </p>
<p>Of course, any focus on the pedestrian realm is welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

