<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kate Ascher: New York City&#8217;s Next DOT Commissioner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/</link>
	<description>Covering the New York City Streets Renaissance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:31:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian D</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/comment-page-1/#comment-29176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/#comment-29176</guid>
		<description>Funny - some of us downtowners were talking recently about PED LOS and VEHICLE interference (after sitting through DOT&#039;s testimony on Intro. 199 and the subjects of LOS and PED interference).

I agree - the PED LOS should not be measured just by density, it is also affected greatly by activity (it is impossible to move through the jam created by SoHo&#039;s vendors, for example).

High-quality illustrations in Ascher&#039;s book - they sure might look nice if they were implemented in real-life, don&#039;t ya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny - some of us downtowners were talking recently about PED LOS and VEHICLE interference (after sitting through DOT's testimony on Intro. 199 and the subjects of LOS and PED interference).</p>
<p>I agree - the PED LOS should not be measured just by density, it is also affected greatly by activity (it is impossible to move through the jam created by SoHo's vendors, for example).</p>
<p>High-quality illustrations in Ascher's book - they sure might look nice if they were implemented in real-life, don't ya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Dotmolsky</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/comment-page-1/#comment-29161</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Dotmolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/#comment-29161</guid>
		<description>So first it was Joan MacDonald, then it was Janette Sadik-Kahn, now Kate Ascher.  What I surmise from this is that someone who contributes to Streetsblog sits outside Doctoroff&#039;s office and thinks every woman who walks in is being interviewed for the DOT Commissioner spot.

Having no inside information on this particular horse race, I can&#039;t help but think of the Crain&#039;s article a couple of weeks back that said all the high powered names being bandied about (including two of the above) aren&#039;t interested because they all earn more elsewhere.

The only inside information I&#039;ve got is that DOT Commissioner is a pretty unappealing job for anyone actually wants to do something about mobility in NY, be paid a salary commensurate with his/her market value, or avoid being sucked into a scandal not of your making.

What do you think, oh person who sits outside Dan&#039;s door?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So first it was Joan MacDonald, then it was Janette Sadik-Kahn, now Kate Ascher.  What I surmise from this is that someone who contributes to Streetsblog sits outside Doctoroff's office and thinks every woman who walks in is being interviewed for the DOT Commissioner spot.</p>
<p>Having no inside information on this particular horse race, I can't help but think of the Crain's article a couple of weeks back that said all the high powered names being bandied about (including two of the above) aren't interested because they all earn more elsewhere.</p>
<p>The only inside information I've got is that DOT Commissioner is a pretty unappealing job for anyone actually wants to do something about mobility in NY, be paid a salary commensurate with his/her market value, or avoid being sucked into a scandal not of your making.</p>
<p>What do you think, oh person who sits outside Dan's door?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/comment-page-1/#comment-29158</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/02/20/kate-ascher-new-york-citys-next-dot-commissioner/#comment-29158</guid>
		<description>Sounds really promising.  

My only nit-picky comment is about Pedestrian Level of Service: I&#039;m not sure the analogy to traffic LOS holds up here, since emptier sidewalks aren&#039;t necessarily better that busier ones (especially in terms of vibrancy and safety).  

Of course, any focus on the pedestrian realm is welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds really promising.  </p>
<p>My only nit-picky comment is about Pedestrian Level of Service: I'm not sure the analogy to traffic LOS holds up here, since emptier sidewalks aren't necessarily better that busier ones (especially in terms of vibrancy and safety).  </p>
<p>Of course, any focus on the pedestrian realm is welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
